and renderer.
And that *is* in Fossil.
Will
On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:03 PM, chi wrote:
Will Duquette wrote: - hide quoted text -
Hello Will,
I've got a fossil repository at
http://wjduquette.com/projects/robbie.cgi. If I download a Zip
Archive for a leaf, the OS X Archive Utility won't unzip
:
On Nov 28, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Will Duquette wrote:
Richard asked that I give more information on ticket 1e919e389b
here on the mailing list.
What I was seeing, and reported in that ticket, was this:
* I was running on Ubuntu Karmic Koala.
* I did a fossil all sync to sync a local repository
My two cents on all of this: regardless of what wiki syntax is used,
the Fossil Wiki is a lousy way to do your software documentation. You
write your software. Ultimately, you deliver your software. Then you
want to deliver your documentation *with* your software...and it's in
a wiki
for.
Jeremy
--
From: Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 10:36 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm)
My two cents on all of this: regardless of what
Anonymous can clone it, according to the Users page. I've not tried
that myself.
Will
On Nov 29, 2009, at 5:04 PM, chi wrote:
Will Duquette wrote:
Chi,
Hello Will,
Thanks for the word about the bug fix. I'll see about updating to
the
latest Fossil binary; I'd been putting
Purely out of curiousity, I've glanced at Markdown and Creole, neither
of which I've used.
The problem with Markdown is that the format as defined simply isn't a
Wiki format. It's Wiki-like, but doesn't include the markup for links
to wiki pages. (There's some kind of linking, but it
and can be added too slowly, etc...
Jeremy
--
From: Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 9:15 PM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm)
Purely out
Burning? Not precisely; but it certainly seems like something that
should be there.
Will
On Nov 30, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone else have a burning desire for a search facility to be
added to Fossil?
Cheers,
Stephen
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at
Fossil does RSS? Cool! I did not know that.
Will
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
You can look at: http://jeremy.cowgar.com/mailroom/index.cgi/
timeline and see:
2009-12-08
17:20:15 * [d2dfbefa0e] Leaf Modified message_insert to accept
parameterized arguments
Brian,
I click on one of your links, and found myself at your fossil repo,
logged in as
btheado with full access to the Admin settings. Eeek!
Will
On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Brian Theado wrote:
I have ported the user() and cgi() sql functions from cvstrac to
fossil.
Also, I
On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
IMO, duplicating the shell functionality is the wrong approach,
mainly because there will be behavioural differences between
fossil's and the shell's globbing. i agree it would be convenient
for us users, but it technically could not be
On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com
wrote:
It seems that fossil is in need of two things:
1. Save the commit message to a file when the commit failed
2. Provide a means of making fossil read the commit message
On Dec 9, 2009, at 1:29 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
On Dec 9, 2009, at 12:39 PM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
In the 3 features... thread, I read from Michael:
Secondly, I always get bit with my commit failing and then
having to type in my comment again (after the monkeying around
with 'fossil
I was unclear, apparently.
Suppose fossil rm *.foo deletes the files from the file system and
from Fossil.
If I then do
rm *.foo
when I meant to do
fossil rm *.foo
I can then do
fossil update
which will give me my *.foo files back. Then, I can do
fossil rm *.foo
Note
On Dec 10, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com wrote:
I was unclear, apparently.
Suppose fossil rm *.foo deletes the files from the file system and
from Fossil.
If I then do
rm *.foo
when I meant to do
fossil rm *.foo
I can then do
.
Will
2009/12/10 Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com:
I was unclear, apparently.
Suppose fossil rm *.foo deletes the files from the file system and
from Fossil.
If I then do
rm *.foo
when I meant to do
fossil rm *.foo
I can then do
fossil update
which will give me my
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:58 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
(Third thing that needs to be fixed - there ought to be an easier way
to revert many files. Or, maybe if files are missing they out to be
automatically rm-ed. Or maybe that there is an option to
automatically rm missing files. Thoughts?
Venkat,
I came in late on this thread...is your version of vc available
somewhere?
Thanks!
Will Duquette
On May 5, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Venkat Iyer wrote:
From: Gour g...@gour-nitai.com
I'm still in the evaluating phase for Fossil, but being an Emacs
user, I'm curious why you're
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
On May 6, 2010, at 8:25 AM, Gour g...@gour-nitai.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 07:04:10 -0700
Will == Will Duquette wrote:
Will I came in late on this thread...is your version of vc available
Will somewhere?
See attachment in:
http://article.gmane.org
.
If I start editing files while planning to fossil commit -branch new-branch,
then my work area doesn't match my development context. If I create the new
branch explicitly, then I've changed my development context in my head AND in
my work area.
Will
Mr. Will Duquette, OP
library. With Subversion, I'd do an svn:external to pull the infrastructure
library into my working area as a subdirectory. Is there an equivalent way to
do this with fossil that won't get me into trouble?
Thanks very much!
Will
Mr. Will Duquette, OP
will -at- wjduquette dot com
http
!
Cheers,
Gareth
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 04:38:49 -, Will Duquette w...@wjduquette.com wrote:
Howdy!
Is there a document that describes the best practices for a project that
involves components from multiple fossil repositories?
For example, suppose I've got an infrastructure
22 matches
Mail list logo
