ommit to your repo, or just edited a check-in comment, it would
have started working again on its own.
>
> Tomek
>
> --
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:26:23 -0500
> From: bill.burd...@gmail.com
>
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: R
Thanks Richard, I'm glad I wasn't just going crazy :).
Is this a problem only on the server end, or on the client end as well?
Tomek
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:26:23 -0500
From: bill.burd...@gmail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning
fc9f661810373fe08bf2bbf31d942c4ac985fbc
>>> 31 non-phantom blobs (out of 32 total) checked: 2 errors
>>>
>>> For the cloned repo, while the original (file copied) repo gives 0
>>> errors. Recloning surprising gives the exact same errors and checksums.
&
skin, but that
>> shouldn't change things.
>>
>> Tomek
>>
>> --
>> From: d...@sqlite.org
>> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:30:19 -0400
>>
>> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
>> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of priv
ng in the trunk. I'm using my own skin, but that
> shouldn't change things.
>
> Tomek
>
> --
> From: d...@sqlite.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:30:19 -0400
>
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corru
00
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Tomek Kott wrote:
Richard,
fossil rebuild repo doesn't help. However, fossil test-integrity gives:
checksum mismatch on a
loning surprising gives the exact same errors and checksums.
>
> Tomek
>
>
>
> --
> From: d...@sqlite.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:58:41 -0400
>
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of
s and checksums.
Tomek
From: d...@sqlite.org
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:58:41 -0400
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Tomek Kott wrote:
Are there any tests I can perform?
"fossil rebuild
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Tomek Kott wrote:
>
> Are there any tests I can perform?
>
>
"fossil rebuild $REPO" is a good test. Also "fossil test-integrity $REPO".
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@l
16 -0400
> From: ja...@calminferno.net
> To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:35:31PM -0400, Tomek Kott wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > Nothing is shown in the timeline besides the
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 01:35:31PM -0400, Tomek Kott wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Nothing is shown in the timeline besides the "initial commit" entry, and no
> files are shown in the browser. Manually going to artifact pages also results
> in nothing.
>
> I also want to clarify that I am in no way tryin
t; access to (two) full repos. I just want to diagnose the cloning process /
> private repo process for future use.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomek
>
> --
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:30:18 -0500
> From: bill.burd...@gmail.com
> To: fossil-user
st want to diagnose the cloning process / private repo
process for future use.
Thanks,
Tomek
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:30:18 -0500
From: bill.burd...@gmail.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Corrupt cloning of private repo
What happens with you open a UI on it?
O
What happens with you open a UI on it?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Tomek Kott wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It's been a while since I set up a private repo (see
> http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg05451.html)
> online, and needed to set a new one up from a fossil re
Hi folks,
It's been a while since I set up a private repo (see
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg05451.html)
online, and needed to set a new one up from a fossil repo with four
commits. I used fossil ui to set it up locally (removing all permissions
except 's' f
15 matches
Mail list logo
