I tried cloning via SSH, it's now work well. Just one small thing. I
don't know if it's my setup, but I get the following warning:
Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal.
Just after showing the ssh command line, which is only something like:
ssh me@hostname
my
2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell
> I've had troubles with 'dropbear' loading the proper scripts.
>
> Does your provider use openssh?
>
It appears to be. ssh --help output looks like my local ssh's output (but
doesn't name the product) and 'man ssh' says it's openssh. They use Linux
servers, so i
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:38:08 -0500
Ron Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
> > Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to
> > encrypt connections for push/pu
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then
>> issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act
>> as a server for the client-si
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:42:19AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> 2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell
> i have a bashrc configured on that box, which includes ~/bin in my path, and
> my bash_profile simply sources bashrc, but the hoster has apparently done
> something to their ssh which causes those to
2011/2/17 Lluís Batlle i Rossell
> Please correct me if I am wrong; I just think that noone finds this
> information of
>
any relevance in this thread.
>
That's my understanding as well, but i get the same results with:
ssh -T host 'echo $PATH'
ssh host 'echo $PATH'
i have a bashrc configured
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:04:12AM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> > My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then
> > issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act
> > as a server for th
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> My current approach is to run ssh to a shell on the remote side and then
> issue shell command over the wire that invoke Fossil multiple times to act
> as a server for the client-side protocol. It's all a bit dodgy.
>
git uses this approach
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 07:01:29PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > Is there some simple way to configure Fossil to use a local proxy by
> > default so that an SSH SOCKS proxy could be used without having to hide
> > some kind of painful comm
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:51:14PM +0100, Louis Hoefler wrote:
> > I meant ssl not ssh. Sorry.
>
> Well . . . speaking of SSH VPNs . . .
>
> Is there some simple way to configure Fossil to use a local proxy by
> default so that an SSH SOCKS pr
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:51:14PM +0100, Louis Hoefler wrote:
> I meant ssl not ssh. Sorry.
Well . . . speaking of SSH VPNs . . .
Is there some simple way to configure Fossil to use a local proxy by
default so that an SSH SOCKS proxy could be used without having to hide
some kind of painful comm
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:55:36PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
>
> And /bin/sh is a requirement of glibc for system() to work, so I
> imagine sh will be available in most unix systems.
>
> Don't you think so?
Using sh instead of something like bash sounds perfectly reasonable to me
(if
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:36:16PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> OK, so I've made some tweaks to the SSH code based on the many helpful
> suggestions sent in by readers. (Thanks!) Now the ball is back over to
> you, Chad. Go forth and test. Let us know about both your successes and
> failures
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:36:16PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> > I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
> >
> > I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
> > Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:36:16PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> OK, so I've made some tweaks to the SSH code based on the many helpful
> suggestions sent in by readers. (Thanks!) Now the ball is back over to
> you, Chad. Go forth and test. Let us know about both your successes and
> failures.
I meant ssl not ssh. Sorry.
Am 16.02.2011 21:50, schrieb Louis Hoefler:
You could also setup a vpn service which uses ssh/other encryption.
Would be a bit exaggerated but it is secure.
Greetings, Louis
Am 16.02.2011 18:03, schrieb Chad Perrin:
I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
I've been rumm
You could also setup a vpn service which uses ssh/other encryption.
Would be a bit exaggerated but it is secure.
Greetings, Louis
Am 16.02.2011 18:03, schrieb Chad Perrin:
I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
Web documentation
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
>
> I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
> Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to
> encrypt connections for push/pull and other operations
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:08:40PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > > If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for
> > Fossil,
> > > please speak
What about setting up a persistent connection
using ControlMaster/ControlPath/ControlPersist (man ssh_config) and reusing
it for the multiple commands needed?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <
> jo...@britannica.bec.d
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
> Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to
> encrypt connections for push/pull and other operations using Fossil. Is
Assuming you already
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:04:56PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Justin Mazzi wrote:
>
> > What about using regular pipes?
> >
> > exec ssh remote-server 'fossil command to output raw server data' | fossil
> > receive data
> >
>
> Multiple round-trips from clien
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for Fossil,
> please speak up.
What do you think about what I suggested some time ago in
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for
> Fossil,
> > please speak up.
>
> The correct way is to use ssh -T and a single instance on the other
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for Fossil,
> please speak up.
The correct way is to use ssh -T and a single instance on the other
side. This doesn't currently work since the HTTP processing is
fire-and-
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Justin Mazzi wrote:
> What about using regular pipes?
>
> exec ssh remote-server 'fossil command to output raw server data' | fossil
> receive data
>
Multiple round-trips from client->server->client are required.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richa
What about using regular pipes?
exec ssh remote-server 'fossil command to output raw server data' | fossil
receive data
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
>> I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
>>
>> I've been rumma
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
>
> I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
> Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to
> encrypt connections for push/pull and other operations
That doesn't look like the correct fix. A better fix might be not allocating
a real shell/tty.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Ramon Ribó wrote:
>
> I think that it has still some problems. This ticket contains a bug
> correction still not applied to the code:
>
>
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I think that it has still some problems. This ticket contains a bug
correction still not applied to the code:
http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/884c40589fcee6fa54d18eb3e8db1d1ba337a294
RR
2011/2/16 Chad Perrin
> I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
>
> I've been rummaging through the li
I'm new to this list. Be gentle.
I've been rummaging through the list archives, and sifting through the
Web documentation, but I am still not clear on the status of using SSH to
encrypt connections for push/pull and other operations using Fossil. Is
it stable? Does it require special configurat
31 matches
Mail list logo
