Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > And continuing to reply to myself, the diff to import.c below seems to > correctly tag the revisions in at least the case of the first test > script. (It also contains some renaming of master->trunk but that can > be ignored). > I have check

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

FWIW, that's what my perl script did before fossil got it's own implementation. Kept online here for historical interests. -B On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> On

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wro

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >>> >>> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >>> tags I had in git, the way they become

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >> tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. >> >> I had some tag in the original git repo, which wa

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > I've made a little script (attached here: git_tags_export_test.sh ) > that produce a small git repo with few tags that illustrated it enought. > You can look at the git repo graph with gitk after running the script, > and compare it with

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >> >> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >> tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. >> >> I had some tag in the original git repo, which wa

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >> >> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >> tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. >> >> I had some tag in the original git repo, which wa

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my > tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. > > I had some tag in the original git repo, which was not branch, only a > tag to a particular version. Once I convert

[fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my tags I had in git, the way they become in fossil. I had some tag in the original git repo, which was not branch, only a tag to a particular version. Once I convert to fossil, those tag propagate to future versions until next tag