On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com wrote:
No. The reason is that the paragraph is never pushed onto the stack, thus
when closing the tags out, there is not a paragraph to pop off (close).
I saw a commit where the code was duplicated into the endAutoParagraph. I
I do not use the Files link much, at all, however today I noticed that the
File List via the main toolbar's Files link shows files that are no longer
in the repo. Well, in any current leaf that is. They are obviously there in old
revisions.
Is this the designed behavior? You can see this on:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com wrote:
If you want the Files button on the main menu to only show currently
existing files, simply change the link to be
/dir?ci=trunk
I think I will do that. To me it's more likely that someone will browse the
Files
On Dec 8, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jeremy Cowgar jer...@cowgar.com
wrote:
If you want the Files button on the main menu to only show currently
existing files, simply change the link to be
/dir?ci=trunk
I think I will do that. To me
In practical terms, it is very annoying and confusing to go to the
files section and see that the file that we introduced by error
several years ago and immediately after deleted, is listed there as a
normal file.
In my opinion, the best option would be to list by default the files
of the last
You can look at: http://jeremy.cowgar.com/mailroom/index.cgi/timeline and see:
2009-12-08
17:20:15 * [d2dfbefa0e] Leaf Modified message_insert to accept parameterized
arguments including -fromfetch which will trigger the use of logging. (user:
jnc, tags: trunk)
17:10:24 * Changes to wiki
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:47:18AM -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:43 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
I do not use the Files link much, at all, however today I noticed
that the File List via the main toolbar's Files link shows files
that are no longer in the repo. Well,
I believe this is something not right with the RSS times. If you look at the
timeline for Mailroom (http://jeremy.cowgar.com/mailroom/index.cgi/timeline),
you see:
2009-12-08
18:04:21 * [6837669f52] Leaf Fixed the argument handling to message_insert
(user: jnc, tags: trunk)
17:20:15 *
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:12 PM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
The two listed in the timeframe are 17:20 and 17:10 but in the rss
feed those two same items are 21:20 and 22:10. The 17:20 and 17:10
are correct. Now, their are two problems with the RSS feed. It seems
like it's converting again to GMT
D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com wrote:
I checked a simplification to the RSS code. Why not try it and see if
it works any better for you.
Yup, that works. Thanks.
Jeremy
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com wrote:
All this talk about RSS prompted me to look for an RSS link on the
fossil gui. I can't find one. I figured it out by scouring the list
archive. Where should we document the timeline.rss link? I think it
would be cool to have it on the footer but
Ah that may explain it. I'm using google chrome (a modern browser) which has
no rss support at all.
RW
Ron Wilson, Engineering Project Lead
(o) 434.455.6453, (m) 434.851.1612, www.harris.com
HARRIS CORPORATION | RF Communications Division
assuredcommunications(tm)
-Original
Any feedback on the below?
Jeremy
Subject: Numbered list syntax?
Hello,
I am looking at the source and see that enumerated lists are defined by:
1. Hello
2. Goodbye
i.e. a two spaces, a number, a period, two spaces, text.
Why was it decided to use that syntax instead of the
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:58 +, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Any feedback on the below?
My only concern would be that in several languages, # is the
everything-after-this-on-this-line-is-a-comment character. Probably
there's no issue, but I'd just want to be sure it wouldn't end up
corrupting code
Joshua Paine jos...@letterblock.com wrote:
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:58 +, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Any feedback on the below?
My only concern would be that in several languages, # is the
everything-after-this-on-this-line-is-a-comment character. Probably
there's no issue, but I'd just want
Fossil does RSS? Cool! I did not know that.
Will
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
You can look at: http://jeremy.cowgar.com/mailroom/index.cgi/
timeline and see:
2009-12-08
17:20:15 * [d2dfbefa0e] Leaf Modified message_insert to accept
parameterized arguments
I like it.
Ron Wilson, Engineering Project Lead
(o) 434.455.6453, (m) 434.851.1612, www.harris.com
HARRIS CORPORATION | RF Communications Division
assuredcommunications(tm)
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-
Me like it too.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 9, 2009 6:54 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Numbered list syntax?
I like it.Ron Wilson, Engineering Project Lead(o) 434.455.6453, (m)
I have ported the user() and cgi() sql functions from cvstrac to fossil.
Also, I implemented functionality similar to cvstrac's wiki() function.
I described what I did in a comment on this ticket:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/66de526498.
I have deployed a clone of the fossil repo
Brian,
I click on one of your links, and found myself at your fossil repo,
logged in as
btheado with full access to the Admin settings. Eeek!
Will
On Dec 8, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Brian Theado wrote:
I have ported the user() and cgi() sql functions from cvstrac to
fossil.
Also, I
I like it a lot. Renumbering lists was always a hassle.
2009/12/9 altufa...@mail.com
Me like it too.
- Altu
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Ronald rwils...@harris.com
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 9, 2009 6:54 am
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Numbered
21 matches
Mail list logo
