On Sat, 15 May 2010 07:11:35 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Gour wrote:
On Sat, 15 May 2010 11:30:40 +0100
Eric == Eric wrote:
Eric Otherwise, lack of standard wiki
Eric
Eric I continue to be amazed by all this nonsense about the wiki.
I just want to throw this out there...
Since I began using Fossil, I've tried to evangelize it because I know
that the more users, the greater tool support, the longer life, the
greater the product. Do you know how many people I've got to use Fossil
for any length of time? 2 and one of them is
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:39:37 -0400
Jeremy == Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Jeremy As time goes on and I see such a strong stance against any
Jeremy formal wiki syntax I get less and less excited about using
Jeremy Fossil.
Same here...I became so excited about Fossil and ready to leave darcs
(although
Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just
it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and
DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge. Other SCM's can't touch
it even with Redmine/Trac. One suggested just using a distributed ticket
system that
On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:23:07 Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just
it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and
DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge.
Yes.
But, for all that, the lack of a complete wiki
On 5/16/2010 12:49 PM, Ron Aaron wrote:
On Sunday 16 May 2010 19:23:07 Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
Oh, one more thing I wanted to say Fossil is awesome with not just
it's integrated ticket and wiki system but it's integrated and
DISTRIBUTED ticket and wiki system. That's huge.
Yes.
On 5/16/2010 1:27 PM, Ramon Ribó wrote:
Hello,
As I see that the wiki problem is becoming a hot topic, I would also
give my opinion. I do not have a strong point here, as we use the wiki
pages only for short notes, so it is not very important the wiki
language to be used.
This is
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:30:09PM -0400, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
The trunk of the Fossil source tree now uses the Simplified (2-clause)
BSD License. Code contributions from people for whom I do not have a
copyright release on file have been removed from the trunk and push
privileges for
Thank you very much.
- Venkat
-Original Message-
From: D. Richard Hipp d...@hwaci.com
Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2010 15:30:09
Subject: [fossil-users] Fossil now uses the Simplified BSD License
The trunk of the Fossil source tree now uses the Simplified (2-clause)
BSD License. Code
I'm making a first pass at implementing code/tickets/wiki search. Anybody
working on something similar? If you have any thoughts on functionality,
implementation, or anything else, let me know.
diff -rupN fossil_src_orig/src/db.c fossil2/src/db.c
--- fossil_src_orig/src/db.c2010-03-18
The trunk of the Fossil source tree now uses the Simplified (2-clause)
BSD License. Code contributions from people for whom I do not have a
copyright release on file have been removed from the trunk and push
privileges for those people have been revoked.
But you did not ask for a release,
Thanks, drh. Makes me even more excited about contributing more when I
can make time.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
12 matches
Mail list logo
