On 9/25/17, John P. Rouillard wrote:
>>
>>Example: The line at
>>https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/annotate?origin=trunk=src/diff.c=d9ef474a1
>>is missing from trunk. To find out where it was deleted, use the
>>following URL:
>>
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Andy Goth wrote:
> whatever was going on. Might want to explicitly turn on more warnings
> like -Wunused or -Wall or even -Wextra to help spot these types of issues.)
>
Sidebar: i tried -Wall with fossil years ago but it didn't like
On 9/25/17, John P. Rouillard wrote:
>
> So do I need the exact revision where the line existed, or do I just
> need a revision earlier than when I think the line was last deleted?
>
Any version prior to where the line was deleted. The reverse
annotation will tell you the
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 16:04:32 -0400:
> It does work sometimes, at least: https://fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/1f378f9e3
I've seen it work before too, so I'm not sure why it would be
different with the steps Andy Goth provided. Guess it will take some
Thanks so much Andy, this is great! So far so good on my end...
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Andy Goth wrote:
> I implemented tech note search capability on the search-technote branch.
> Please have a look and let me know if it's good. Maybe the way I named
>
In response to Chris Rydalch saying that search-technote works for him,
in combination with it passing all my tests, I'd like to merge it to trunk.
What is the correct procedure for doing so?
If I do:
$ f up trunk
$ f merge search-technote -baseline root:search-technote -integrate
Then any
On 09/25/17 10:39, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 9/25/17, Andy Goth wrote:
As far as I can tell, in the general case I described in my previous
email, assuming waiting was not an option, the best to do would have
been to explicitly specify the -baseline option when merging
On 09/25/17 10:18, Richard Hipp wrote:
On 9/25/17, Andy Goth wrote:
In response to Chris Rydalch saying that search-technote works for him,
in combination with it passing all my tests, I'd like to merge it to trunk.
What is the correct procedure for doing so?
At this
On 9/25/17, Andy Goth wrote:
> As far as I can tell, in the general case I described in my previous
> email, assuming waiting was not an option, the best to do would have
> been to explicitly specify the -baseline option when merging the child
> branch and later when
On 9/25/17, Andy Goth wrote:
> In response to Chris Rydalch saying that search-technote works for him,
> in combination with it passing all my tests, I'd like to merge it to trunk.
>
> What is the correct procedure for doing so?
>
> At this point I'm inclined to just be
On 09/25/17 09:35, Chris Rydalch wrote:
Thanks so much Andy, this is great! So far so good on my end...
Merged to trunk, along with all the other recent developments. Please
update and test some more, if you don't mind.
--
Andy Goth |
___
On 09/21/17 20:48, Andy Goth wrote:
On 09/21/17 19:51, Richard Hipp wrote:
I don't have any idea [why] the tags are not working for you.
Try this sequence:
f new repo.fossil
mkdir ckout
cd ckout
f open ../repo.fossil
touch xxx
f add xxx
f commit -date-override 2018-01-01 -m 'add xxx'
sleep 5
I am trying things differently this year. I want to use one instance of
fossil running proxied behind a firewall. I have the following in my
Apache conf file:
ProxyPass http://127.0.0.1:8081
ProxyPassReverse http://127.0.0.1:8081
SetOutputFilter proxy-html
On 9/25/17, David Mason wrote:
> I am trying things differently this year. I want to use one instance of
> fossil running proxied behind a firewall. I have the following in my
> Apache conf file:
>
>
> ProxyPass http://127.0.0.1:8081
>
> ProxyPassReverse
On 9/23/17, John P. Rouillard wrote:
>
> I am trying to find out when a line dissapeared from a file.
>
As of the latest version of Fossil (checked into trunk moments ago)
you can do this:
fossil annotate $filename -r $oldversion -o trunk
$filename is the name of
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:45:23 -0500:
> Has anyone tried running these commands yet? I want to see if anyone
> else can replicate my problem.
Sorry, I misinterpreted your comment about having a bad timezone (except
in Narnia) as a retraction of your original problem.
And now
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:45:23 -0500:
> Has anyone tried running these commands yet? I want to see if anyone
> else can replicate my problem.
I just tried and was able to reproduce the problem. It happens on
rebuild whether one does it via the ``fossil amend''
On 9/25/17, Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:45:23 -0500:
>
>> Has anyone tried running these commands yet? I want to see if anyone
>> else can replicate my problem.
>
> I just tried and was able to reproduce the problem. It
18 matches
Mail list logo