[fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

Recently I have been looking to use fossil as a backend for managing the Tcl tip collection. An obvious format for the new tip format would be markdown, but currently the fossil markdown support is fairly limited (for example there are no code blocks) I have made a version of fossil which supports

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

. On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, 15:38 Scott Robison, wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Mark Janssen > wrote: > > My question to you all is, would there be any interest in adding > commonmark support? > > > I like the idea of a more fully featured markdown implementation.

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

I wasn't aware that the author of the current implementation was a fossil user as well :) On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, 16:22 Natacha Porté, wrote: > > I never understood the appeal for code blocks, but if it's only that > it's very easy to add to the existing implementation. > Code blocks are very conv

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Natacha Porté wrote: > > > I should really clarify that it was about *fenced* code blocks, since > traditional markdown code blocks are correctly supported (unless there > is a serious bug in there). > > I do understand the use of code blocks, and use them myself f

Re: [fossil-users] Support for commonmark markdown in fossil

*/ if( data[i]=='`' ){ size_t span_nb = 0, bt; On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Natacha Porté wrote: > Hello, > > on Tuesday 14 March 2017 at 15:44, Mark Janssen wrote: >> I did notice a (IMO) bug during the conversion: >> >> $ cat markdown-test2.md &

Re: [fossil-users] Issue with ignore-glob

That's not a security hole at all. Once a file was added, ignoring it will not remove past version from the repository. History in fossil is immutable. If you inadvertently added a file which shouldn't be there you should shun it instead. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Thomas wrote: > On 2017-0

Re: [fossil-users] Using Fossil with Apache Proxy

On 28 Sep 2017 13:37, "David Mason" wrote: I have all the logic I need I just want fossil to behave like it would at a terminal prompt, rather than acting like a CGI... the complication is that I am calling it from a CGI! But removing all the environment variable mostly solves the problem.

Re: [fossil-users] Forget large set of changes

Fossil cannot remove existing history. So removing only one dir and the associated history is not possible. Why don't you just update the files to be sorted and after that always keep adding them sorted? The diffs up until now will still be noisy, but from now on they will be more readable and yo

Re: [fossil-users] binary-glob not honored

.fossil-settings should be a subfolder of your repository checkout, not your home folder. On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, 16:03 Gour, wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on a web site and wanted to perform initial import, but Fossil > (version 2.5 [561fa8a3b7]) complains: > > ./pages/01.blog/14th-anniversary/g

Re: [fossil-users] binary-glob not honored

>From the manual: "Where a setting is a list of values, such as ignore-glob, you can use a newline as a separator as well as a comma." https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/settings.wiki On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, 18:48 Gour, wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:00:22 +000

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 28

Unless I am misunderstanding what you mean by permanent record, I don't think this is possible in a DVCS. In a DVCS the remote can be different and even change between pull/syncs Op za 16 dec. 2017 21:42 schreef Ron W : > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:00 AM, < > fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

rg> wrote: >> >> Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 09:56:57 +0000 >> From: Mark Janssen >> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 28 >> Message-ID: >> > o5bgtr...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Re: [fossil-users] Replacing subversion revision number... by what?

All of this will fail in the case of private branches (or other DAG differences) between different repositories, unless you special case private branches. And how will you handle diverging repos so that my version 12 is not your version 12, because I didn't sync after commit 10? I wouldn't be surpr

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >>> >>> I've convert a git repository to fossil and I'm a bit confuse with my >>> tags I had in git, the way they become

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: >>&

Re: [fossil-users] branch vs tags when importing from git

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >>>> >>

Re: [fossil-users] Segfaults on Solaris when serving a directory

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Petr Man wrote: > Hello, > I have been successfully using Fossil on SunOS 5.10/sparc for over six > months. I wanted to set up a permanent cgi server this morning, but I > am getting core dumps when I try to serve a directory with fossil > files. With a separate c

Re: [fossil-users] 3-way merge likely to happen anytime soon?

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Petr Man wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:35:03AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> Please let me know if http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/9b7a6f80b2 works >> for you. >> > I guess this closes ticket [427938e2f6]. > > -- > My GnuPG key is at http://petr.madnetw

[fossil-users] [PATCH] Patches for MinGW makefile

Please find attached a patch that contains the following changes to the windows Makefile.mingw * Build the fossil.exe with the icon file in /win * Add a setup target to the Makefile to create a windows installer (requires NSIS) * Change the Makefile so that SSL enabled builds can be created by def

Re: [fossil-users] Check-in [36e3ab4c42] breaks SSL on mingw

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Petr Man wrote: > Hello, > Check-in [36e3ab4c42] seems to break SSL on mingw, removing "-static" > from TCC fixes it. > Petr > ___ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.o

Re: [fossil-users] git equivalent commands

2011/3/11 Lluís Batlle i Rossell > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 06:58:59PM -, Eric wrote: > > > > On Fri, March 11, 2011 7:27 am, Federico Ramallo wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was wondering how to do git reset --hard on a fossil repository. > Because > > > fossil clean only clear extra files, bu

Re: [fossil-users] Howto construct a download url for the latest file in a repository?

To get the trunk version of file webui.wiki, you can use (in bash): $ fossil artifact `fossil artifact $(fossil info trunk | grep uuid | tr -s " " | cut -d" " -f2) | grep webui.wiki | cut -d" " -f3` What it does is: Get uuid of the last trunk commit. Then get the manifest for that commit. Then ch

Re: [fossil-users] Moving a local repository to a hosted repo

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:12 PM, David Bovill wrote: > At the moment the way I start a shared repo, is to create it on the server > and then clone the shared repo to a local copy. > > However, it is more useful to be able to do this the other way round, that > is to start a repo locally (perhaps

Re: [fossil-users] Building fossil on Windows with MinGW - dependency on libz

On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Arjen Markus wrote: > Hello, > > I have built fossil on Windows (XP) using MinGW and the gcc compiler. > That works fine, except that the resulting executable depends on > the libz-1.dll that is located in the MinGW bin directory. > > This means such an executable

Re: [fossil-users] Ticket 305143bd876f693f446f78d12dbef143c46eec58

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Michael Richter wrote: > >> OK, perhaps I'm being as thick as a whale omlette here, but I cannot get >> this to work at all. >> >> First attempt: "relay-to" was set to www.fossil-scm.org:80, "listen" was

Re: [fossil-users] error

On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Federico Ramallo wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an error that doesn't allow me to commit. Do you have any ideas what > could be wrong? > > $ f commit --branch svn_R2 -f -m 'added svn branch R2' > Autosync: http://frama...@tangosource.com/fossil/dibspace >

Re: [fossil-users] build error, missing manifest.uuid

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Zed A. Shaw wrote: > Uh, this may sound stupid but latest trunk fails with: > > make: *** No rule to make target `src/../manifest.uuid', needed by > `bld/VERSION.h'.  Stop. > > Because, for some reason, my checkout on this one machine does not have > a manifest.uui

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a binary artifact

2011/11/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell : > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: >> Sorry to contact you directly Lluis, i can receive mail form list >> but can't post (my isp blacklisted this list) > > Weird. How could that happen? > >> At 12:19 02/11/2011, Lluís Batlle i Rosse

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a binary artifact

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > 2011/11/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell : >> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote: >>> Sorry to contact you directly Lluis, i can receive mail form list >>> but can't post (my isp blackli

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a binary artifact

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> >> Following patch fixes the issue. >> > > This fixes viriketo's specific complaint, but it also creates a bunch of new > problems for people running

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a binary artifact

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> >> Without wanting to open a huge can of worms, IMHO a DVCS should return >> artifacts unmodified (e.g. treat everything as a binary file). > > And Fo

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a binary artifact

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: >> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Mark Janssen >> > wrote: >> >> >&g

Re: [fossil-users] Mailing list archives for fossil-users not available?

http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/ works for me (from the fossil home page) On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Steve Bennett wrote: > My email has been broken for a few days, so I went to check > the archives. > > Any of the links at: > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/c

Re: [fossil-users] Error: wrong project

There is a mismatch in the project-codes. Fortunately chiselapp provides functionality to fix this. When creating the repository on chiselapp override the project code with the project-code you get when doing fossil info -R repository. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:05 AM, wrote: > Hello, > > I have

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil crashes on Windows

Unless this is not the whole story, this is not a crash, Fossil gives an error. Did you try the solution suggested in the error message? Try a "fossil rebuild" from the checkout. Mark -Original Message- From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fo

Re: [fossil-users] problems........

Looks like you still have a stray _FOSSIL_ file in your C:\. From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org [mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of android devkit Sent: maandag 16 januari 2012 16:43 To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: [fossil-users] probl

[fossil-users] Patch for building fossil for Android using NDK

After struggeling with cross compiling fossil for Android using plain GCC for a while, I tried today to compile it using the NDK. After a tiny change in the code (adding a define for getpass()) and some new NDK build scripts, I was able to compile and run fossil from my Android tablet. I tested clo

Re: [fossil-users] Patch for building fossil for Android using NDK

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/3/15 Mark Janssen : > > I have attached the patch for those who are interested. Currently you > need > > to build on Linux because of the source translation step. It would be > nice > > if this could somehow b

Re: [fossil-users] Patch for building fossil for Android using NDK

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> After struggeling with cross compiling fossil for Android using plain GCC >> for a while, I tried today to compile it using the NDK. >> ... >> >

Re: [fossil-users] proxy setting and ssh:// url

This probably fixes issue 137cf42ad9 as well. Can't check at the moment but will check when at work. On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> Here's a patch that should ignore proxy settings with file:// and ssh:// >> p

Re: [fossil-users] Question about Source forge Fossil hosting

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Jeff Rogers wrote: > Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: > >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:10:48 -0400 >> > > > 2. Obtain a fossil binary. Unfortunately the ones from the download page > on fossil-scm.org are built against a newer version of linux than SF's > servers and so wi

Re: [fossil-users] Question about Source forge Fossil hosting

n build fossil directly on the sourceforge machine" > 1/ SSH access and download of checkins ? > 2/ SSH access + ./configure directly with sourceforge... ? > > > Best Regards > > K. > > -- > *From :* Mark Janssen > *Cc :* jim Schi

Re: [fossil-users] fossil not recognizing changes to binary files?

I have never seen this myself personally. How can you tell that the executables on Linux are gzipped? I seem to recall that Tclkits use some gzip compressed parts (which might have the "file" utility report it as a gzipped archive incorrectly). What happens if you don't manually gunzip the files?

Re: [fossil-users] Did you know that Fossil could do...

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil, > you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those > two nodes? > > I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many > peop

[fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

I am still maintaining 2 build scripts for building fossil for Android. It would be nice if this is included in the main fossil tree. I think the amount of code is so small it doesn't warrant a contributors agreement, if it does, is it possible to send a scanned copy by email? The changes are at:

Re: [fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > Please do email a scan of the signed CLA. Thanks. > > CLA is on its way. > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> I am still maintaining 2 build scripts for building fossil for Android. >&g

Re: [fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:32 PM, David Given wrote: > Richard Hipp wrote: > [...] > > How do you actually use Fossil on an Android device, since it is a shell > > application? Is there a shell I can use on Android? I mean something > > other than "adb shell" - some way to use Fossil directly o

Re: [fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> i tried getting fossil running under AIDE last summer but had no luck. >> Would you mind posting a short HOWTO? (i would gladly add it to the fossil >> docs collection!). >> > > s/AIDE

Re: [fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

On Jun 11, 2013 8:07 PM, "Matt Welland" wrote: > > If some kind soul posted a binary for android somewhere accessible I'd be very grateful. Having the build stuff integrated is the next best thing. I use the shell and sshdroid and having fossil on my phone would be great. BTW, mounting your phone

Re: [fossil-users] Integrating build scripts for Android

For everyone still trying this out. I have some scripts for Terminal IDE which will transform your Android device in a fossil hosting server. You can find them at http://repos.mpcjanssen.nl/terminal-ide (hosted on my Asus TF101) @drh did you receive my CLA? On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Mark

[fossil-users] Latest SQLite3 broken on Android?

Just a quick heads up for http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=752aa31a6d since I don't have access to the sqlite3 mailing list/repo. It seems that the latest version of SQLite3 fails to build for Android (the Android Bionic libc doesn't have posix_fallocate). Considering the widespread u

Re: [fossil-users] Random thoughts on Fossil v2

Bit late to the party, but my 2 cents 1) Fossil as a library or API with the fossil executable as a single file built on top of it. One could even consider a SCGI/FCGI type of interface where the fossil binary serves JSON+BSON requests. 2) Ticket notifications by email (notification when merged in

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

I would just like to add that fossil already has a defined "API" in the sense that what a fossil repo and server are is described in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki and http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/sync.wiki. I would say that any truly useful fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Scripting in Fossil v2

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> I would just like to add that fossil already has a defined "API" in the >> sense that what a fossil repo and server are is described in >> http://f

Re: [fossil-users] admin pages are empty and have bad titles

What happens if you set base_url without trailing slash? e.g. " https://foobar.com:10443"; On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith wrote: > I think the point here is that with a baseurl of " > https://foobar.com:10443/";, certain links exposed by the fossil HTML > generators wind up p

[fossil-users] Notification on new tickets

One of the things that sites like github do much better than fossil at the moment is to keep you informed of new tickets or ticket changes. When you have a reasonable sized userbase this saves a lot of time in needlessly checking the timeline for ticket changes. Until commit hooks are added (if eve

Re: [fossil-users] Notification on new tickets

On Aug 5, 2013 8:01 PM, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> >> Fossil has built in RSS feeds with the granularity to only show ticket changes. > > > Historical anecdote: that feature was originally proposed/im

Re: [fossil-users] Notification on new tickets

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/8/5 Mark Janssen : > > Until commit hooks are added (if ever, I do understand the issues behind > > it), I have found a nice workaround which I would like to share. > > There is an experimental branch "tkt-cha

Re: [fossil-users] Notification on new tickets

On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/8/6 Mark Janssen : > > I have built the leaf of that branch, but I can't find any change with > the > > trunk UI. Any 5 minute getting started doc? > > > > Mark > > In the UI go to "Adm

Re: [fossil-users] failure to push/sync

I am curious how auto sync screws with your workflow. I was of the same mind in the beginning, always turning of auto sync on my repos. However these days I always leave it on, I like the extra automatic backup. On Aug 14, 2013 10:42 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote: > I'm seeing some kind of authenticati

Re: [fossil-users] failure to push/sync

On Aug 15, 2013 12:00 AM, "Chad Perrin" wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:53:41PM +0200, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > > I am curious how auto sync screws with your workflow. I was of the same > > mind in the beginning, always turning of auto sync on my repo

Re: [fossil-users] Command-line wildcards

It's a problem with the way MinGW parses and passes the command line. When main is called in fossil, the arguments are already expanded. As for the fix, I am not sure yet. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:31 PM, wrote: > >> @ >> Stephan Beal:

Re: [fossil-users] Command-line wildcards

ed. Mark On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > It's a problem with the way MinGW parses and passes the command line. When > main is called in fossil, the arguments are already expanded. As for the > fix, I am not sure yet. > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at

Re: [fossil-users] Command-line wildcards

Yes, for example fossil add * will still do the right thing. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> I did not test this with the 64bit version of MinGW. Using an unquoted * >> in this case still

Re: [fossil-users] Command-line wildcards

Sorry for spamming, but with the change it works within msys, but it fails on the windows command line. Seems like a bit of a Catch 22 caused by the different idea windows and unix have about how to pass arguments. On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > Yes, for exam

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Marc Simpson wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Stephan Beal >> wrote: >> > DVCSs cannot, by their very nature, portably support sequential numbers. >> > This topic has been beaten to death by bra

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

For most of the use cases discussed here I think we don't need repository local unique numbers a la mercurial. As far as I can see a more flexible VERSION [1] format (although the git way is probably overkill) seems to be enough. It would be useful for example to be able to say: fossil diff -r -2

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

To make this less of an academic discussion and to just be able to play around with it, http://mpcjanssen.nl/fossil/fossil/vdiff?from=root:revlist&to=r:5746&sbs=1 has an implementation of having repository local rev numbers for commits only. After updating fossil you'll need to do a fossil rebuild

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> Currently the revision numbers are reflecting the fossil rebuild >> algorithm so they count down from leaves which is a bit odd, but that can >&

Re: [fossil-users] Bikeshedding opportunity: back to the topic of "libfossil"'s name

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Themba Fletcher < > themba.fletc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about "libfree" as a portmanteau of lib, fossil, and three? I guess >> that crosses the line into humor a bit. >> > > And sounds very GNU :/. > >

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:31:17 +0200, Mark Janssen > wrote: > > To make this less of an academic discussion and to just be able to play >> > > very good point (despite being myself in academia ...) and thanks

Re: [fossil-users] strange `fossil diff ' behaviour

On 21 Aug 2013 23:22, "j. van den hoff" wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:07:36 +0200, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, j. van den hoff >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:31:17 +0200, Mark Janssen >>> wrote: &

Re: [fossil-users] Can one display ISO 8601 date-time instead of SHA-1 prefixes in the web UI?

On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Yannick wrote: > ** > Hi people, > > Just discovered Fossil two days ago, and I like the concept, especially > it's simplicity (even if I believe this could be made even a bit clearer) > and it's low weight. > > I was wondered if there is a known way to display (a

Re: [fossil-users] looking for GUI app developer for libfossil

I wouldn't call myself a UI designer by any means, but it would be interesting to try to put something together with libfossil on Android (I do have quite some experience in Android developement). Time permitting, I will have a look at building libfossil on Android (which should be easy as fossil i

Re: [fossil-users] looking for GUI app developer for libfossil

The way I get fossil to build for Android is using the NDK which is also used if you mix C code with an Android app so I see no problems there. Will take any other issues up with you off list. On 18 Sep 2013 17:48, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Mark

Re: [fossil-users] cgi on Mac problem

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:59 PM, j. van den hoff wrote: > hi list, > > > what I see: > >-- access to `http:{mymachine}/cgi-bin/**first.cgi' works just fine (I > do get the `hello world' page) > >-- access to `http:{mymachine}/cgi-bin/**repo.cgi' gives the `internal > server error' in th

Re: [fossil-users] cgi on Mac problem

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > >> http://www.jmarshall.com/easy/http/#responseline >> > > Another tip, taken from that page: > > try sending the request with telnet and see what comes back: > > telnet localhost PORT_NU

Re: [fossil-users] missing branch tag (?)

Branches are controlled by propagating raw tags. Start with fossil tag list --raw checkin. Then I think you should be able to cancel the offending raw tag. On 9 Oct 2013 23:07, "B Harder" wrote: > ...and now I see the edit where the trunk tag was cancelled -- > question remains --- can I undo/rev

Re: [fossil-users] Gentoo: SQLITE_WARNING... best approach for Portage

On 20 Nov 2013 16:40, "Stephan Beal" wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: >> >> Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:24:02 +0100: >> >> > If the patch is relatively small, please just paste it to the list >> > (don't attach it - attachments get stripped)

[fossil-users] State of tkt-hook-change branch

What is the state of the tkt-hool-change branch? I tried using it for my own local repo and I can't get the http ticket hook to trigger. th1-uri-regexp: .* hook command is: http -asynchronous -- http://mpcjanssen.nl/cgi-bin/tkt-hook?uuid=$uuid After adding some debugging statements the hook comma

Re: [fossil-users] State of tkt-hook-change branch

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/12/13 Mark Janssen : > > What is the state of the tkt-hool-change branch? I tried using it for my > own > > local repo and I can't get the http ticket hook to trigger. > > Looks like an uninitialized variabl

Re: [fossil-users] State of tkt-hook-change branch

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/12/13 Mark Janssen : > > With the updated version [85528ef507] I still get the same error. > > xfer_run_script still fails with error: > > > > url must be http:// or https:// > > > > At xfer.c li

Re: [fossil-users] State of tkt-hook-change branch

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > One final piece of feedback, concerning the next step in the trigger process. Fossil seems to encode the trigger request as Content-Type: text/plain even in the case of a GET. Unfortunately this will lead to a

Re: [fossil-users] State of tkt-hook-change branch

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2013/12/13 Mark Janssen : > > One final piece of feedback, concerning the next step in the trigger > > process. Fossil seems to encode the trigger request as Content-Type: > > text/plain even in the case of a GET. > &

Re: [fossil-users] Question on repo size after repeated binary file commits?

On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:37 PM, wrote: > I am curious what is stored in the repo for each new commit that includes > a tiny change to a binary file. > Whether a dll or an image file, is fossil storing each binary file > compressed, uncompressed or some sort of delta? > Over time(6mo's to 1yr), I

[fossil-users] Using Markdown for tickets and in TH1

All, Attached a patch which will do several things: 1) Add a [markdown ] TH1 command to allow access to the included markdown parser from TH1 2) Slightly tweaked the markdown parser to not produce a pair for strings with at most one newline 3) Changed the default ticket page templates to pro

[fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

When I use the following script as a ticket hook: set project simpletask tclInvoke package require http query {SELECT title, status FROM ticket WHERE tkt_uuid=$uuid} { set title [tclInvoke http::formatQuery $title] http -asynchronous -- http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/tkt-hook?uui

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/9 Mark Janssen : > > The reflected information in the query is the info from before the ticket > > update. > > I suspect the ticket hook is fired before the actual ticket change > > transaction is commit

Re: [fossil-users] Confirm commit

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Arseniy Terekhin wrote: > Hello, > > When developing, I often execute last command blindly and sometimes it > happens to be `fossil ci -m "text"`. And sometimes I commit, > forgetting that I'm on a wrong branch. So I purpose to add commit > confirmation that contai

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/9 Jan Nijtmans : > > I have a different fix > > in mind, I'll come back on that later. > > > > Does this work for you? > > Regards, > Jan Nijtmans > __

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > >> 2014/1/9 Jan Nijtmans : >> > I have a different fix >> > in mind, I'll come back on that later. >> >> <http://fossil-

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: >> >>> 2014/1/9 Jan Nijtmans : >>> > I have a differ

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/10 Mark Janssen : > > Sorry to keep replying to myself, but with latest version of > > delay-ticket-hook [e4af590ff9] it still doesn't work. > > The cause is that in tkt.c the result logic is off. Below

Re: [fossil-users] Small issue with ticket hook script

On 11 Jan 2014 20:09, "Jan Nijtmans" wrote: > > 2014/1/9 Mark Janssen : > > When I use the following script as a ticket hook: > > > > set project simpletask > > tclInvoke package require http > > query {SELECT title, status > > FROM t

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > It has been a few months since the last official release of Fossil. I > wonder if we should consider publishing trunk as the official version 1.28? > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > > ___

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2014/1/13 Mark Janssen : > > I am not sure if this is an issue with my MinGW install, but latest trunk > > fails to build on MinGW. I think it's useful if the official release can > > also be built on MinGW.

Re: [fossil-users] fossil ui/serv

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:46 AM, James Turner wrote: > > > I dunno either. Everything is fine on my main development machine. I'll > chalk it up to a messed up virtual machine I guess. Sorry for the > noise. > > I have seen something similar in the past, could it be a permissions issue on the rep

Re: [fossil-users] Windows installer?

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Matt Welland wrote: > The last time I installed fossil on Windows it was a minor hassle as there > was no installer. > > I'm considering putting together an installable version of fossil using > Inno Setup (http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php). > > There is alread

Re: [fossil-users] Painful team interaction with fossil, how to improve?

I have used the ticket hooks and they do work. However they will not allow automatic updates to be sent to whoever logged the ticket. As a result I have moved the bug tracker to redmine. On 13 Feb 2014 16:25, "Baptiste Daroussin" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using fossil for a while now, and I'm quite ha

Re: [fossil-users] Painful team interaction with fossil, how to improve?

On 13 Feb 2014 19:44, "Ron Wilson" wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: >> >> I have used the ticket hooks and they do work. However they will not allow automatic updates to be sent to whoever logged the ticket. >> As a result I hav

  1   2   >