On 02.08.18 17:33 , Jungle Boogie wrote:
> On Thu 02 Aug 2018 11:02 AM, joerg van den hoff wrote:
>> On 02.08.18 10:38, Steve Landers wrote:> On 31 Jul 2018, 9:47 PM +0800,
>> Richard Hipp , wrote:
>>>> I am about ready to merge the forum-v2 branch into trunk. If
On 01.08.18 23:43, John P. Rouillard wrote:
Hi all:
In message <23ebb036-9e71-4e02-b496-1361e3852...@etr-usa.com>,
Warren Young writes:
On Jul 31, 2018, at 7:47 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
The intent is to replace this mailing list
Are you also going to import all the old content, so that
On 02.08.18 10:38, Steve Landers wrote:> On 31 Jul 2018, 9:47 PM +0800,
Richard Hipp , wrote:
>> I am about ready to merge the forum-v2 branch into trunk. If there
>> are any objections, voice them quickly.
>
> An observation (not a criticism) is that (at its current state of
development)
On 06.08.18 22:19, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Here is the technical problem I am having difficulty with. My
> currently solution is (probably) what is causing the delays and errors
> you are seeing. Suggestions from you are any mailing list reader on
> how to solve this problem are appreciated.
I've
On 07.08.18 00:36, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 8/6/18, joerg van den hoff wrote:
>> question: the observation that it seemingly is related specifically to
>> repos holding uv files is unimportant/irrelevant? or does that have
>> implications where to look?
>
> This is
I see substantial delay (order of many seconds to minute(s)) when
executing
`fossil sync' or `fossil uv sync'
between a clone and a "remote" repository residing on the same file system and communicating via
ssh. the command finally succeeds and completes (but it really takes time...)
machine still worked? in both cases the ssh communication should be the same, no?
On 8/7/18, joerg van den hoff wrote:
On 07.08.18 00:36, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 8/6/18, joerg van den hoff wrote:
>> question: the observation that it seemingly is related specifically t
On 07.08.18 16:16 , Andy Bradford wrote:
> Thus said joerg van den hoff on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 16:10:15 +0200:
>
>> why did I see the problem only when actually cloning from another
>> machine, whereas a clone using ssh while being loggedin to the server
>> machin
with current tip of trunk
fossil set uv-sync on
is not honoured by `clone', i.e. without explicit `clone -u', the uv files are not cloned. a
subsequent `sync' (w/o the `-u'), however, does indeed initiate transfer of the uv-files from remote
repo into the new clone. according to
On 08.08.18 14:40 , Richard Hipp wrote:
Please discontinue use of this mailing list except as an emergency
back-up to the forum in case the forum stops working. If forum is not
working, you can also send email directly to me.
well no luck here. this:
An email has been sent to
10 matches
Mail list logo
