The Russian Wikipedia has copied your Mistakes report script but we often
transfer the reports to the discussion pages for correction of wikipedians
looking after their articles.
Victoria
In pl wiki reports are moved too, but only if problem is not solved on the
Zgłoś błąd site.
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 08:37:
BTW - I've seen, that in some (smaller) Wikipedias newbies are welcome by
bots. We try welcome only users with any activity and newbies are welcome by
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] page with links to help pages.
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] is almost useless,
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 08:37:
BTW - I've seen, that in some (smaller) Wikipedias newbies are welcome by
bots. We try welcome only users with any activity and newbies are welcome
by [[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] page with links to help pages.
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] is almost
Censorship !
:)
On 10/9/10 12:35 AM, Austin Hair wrote:
Peter has been placed on moderation as a preventive measure. If
future posts are still civil, irrespective of sanity considerations,
we'll let them through.
Austin
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Peter Damian
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 09:27:
Huh. Yes, but when bot welcome newbie, he can't help this user.
Bots usually add a random signature from a list of experienced users
willing to help.
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hi Robert / all,
I wonder if perhaps folk on the foundation-l mailing list may be able
to help with this issue I'm hoping to clarify as tangetial, but
related to the Controversial Content study;
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Robertmharris#Tangential.2C_but_important
In short, I've
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image
I would think it best to remove permanently;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Closeup_of_female_masturbation_pastel.jpgaction=editredlink=1
cheers,
Peter,
PM.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:59 PM, private
Hoi,
Discussions of single images is not productive. There are probably other
pictures that are best removed. They are the exception not the rule.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 11 October 2010 11:02, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the
thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image
I would think it best to remove permanently;
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Closeup_of_female_masturbation_pastel.jpgaction=editredlink=1
You are aware that, if it is
That word had occured to me, but I didnt dare to mention it in this
discussion as i had been warned here in the past about my usage of
that word here, and didnt want to be put on moderation list myself.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Florence Devouard anthe...@yahoo.com wrote:
Censorship !
An'n 11.10.2010 13:15, hett wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk schreven:
thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image
I would think it best to remove permanently;
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:15 AM, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image
I would think it best to remove permanently;
On 11 October 2010 15:56, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
As for GerardM's comment - I think PM brought it up to illustrate the
problem, not because he thought this was the only example. It isn't a
purely theoretical issue, there are actual cases that make policy
development an important
I stumbled upon a link on the Talk Page of Henry Fonda (which I removed)
which directs the reader to a page that contains a PHP script.
That idea disturbs me, I think it should be, but I'm not sure it is,
against policy.
Do we have a policy that forbids or at least discourages the use of links
On 11/10/2010 15:56, Nathan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:15 AM,wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
failed at copy / paste - with apologies, here is the link to the image
I would think it best to remove permanently;
Hello,
This whole thread is interesting. You can work side by side with someone for
several years and not know that the Wikipedia next door delete talk pages
where the question is resolved.
Anyway, I published an essay about raising quality on the Swedish Wikipedia
a couple of years ago, which
Documentation of consent has been discussed several times on the COM:Sexual
content talk page:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Sexual_content
One interesting idea raised a few days ago was that we could have a drop-down
menu on the upload page for self-made images. This would
On 10/11/2010 12:48 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I stumbled upon a link on the Talk Page of Henry Fonda (which I removed)
which directs the reader to a page that contains a PHP script.
That idea disturbs me, I think it should be, but I'm not sure it is,
against policy.
Do we have a
The following message was rejected by moderators, but I think it is
worth noting on this list.
Whether 'we' like it or not, Gregory Kohs is asking probing questions
and ignoring him is not making him go away; quite the contrary
actually.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:48 AM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I stumbled upon a link on the Talk Page of Henry Fonda (which I removed)
which directs the reader to a page that contains a PHP script.
Here is the diff
On 12 October 2010 00:00, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
The following message was rejected by moderators, but I think it is
worth noting on this list.
Whether 'we' like it or not, Gregory Kohs is asking probing questions
and ignoring him is not making him go away; quite the contrary
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:10 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 October 2010 00:00, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
The following message was rejected by moderators, but I think it is
worth noting on this list.
Whether 'we' like it or not, Gregory Kohs is asking probing
This issue has to be solved. And it couldn't be solved without general
agreement on how it should be.
I suggest that interested parties make a deal and I'll argue inside of
the LangCom that it suggests to the Board to accept the agreement.
As Transnitria has poor Internet access and we don't
23 matches
Mail list logo
