Op Sat, 12 May 2007, schreef L:
As far as I know, Lars is a FPC fan, and he merely wishes to express concern
about some of the issues he has with FPC
Yes I'm a fan.
It's not just the issues that I alone have with FPC since I'm not even an
embedded programmer
myself. I'm putting
Hi All,
I wish to create a proof of concept FPC code that shows how easy it
is to use QT using FPC.
The thing is, that I wish to do it in pure code without using Lazarus.
Is there any known to work binding for QT3 (or 4) that works without
using Lazarus ?
Thanks,
Ido
--
Is there any known to work binding for QT3 (or 4) that works without
using Lazarus ?
Yes: http://users.pandora.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/fpcqt4.html
bye,
Giulio
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Hi! I have worked a bit with implementation. But just a bit... I'm not able
to do anything before middle of June, but then I will do it. So, please,
keep it for me.
--
E.I.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Together with the bindings you can also find good examples, althougth
more examples are always good =)
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Perhaps, a possible way out is to make the LCL more plug-inable. For
example, the LCL needs to support many graphics formats, and the code
ending up in the program has to be designed to support them all; you don't
know what ends up in the resource files. As a solution
On Sunday 13 May 2007 09:39:48 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Together with the bindings you can also find good examples, althougth
more examples are always good =)
thanks,
Please read and extend the FPC Qt4 Binding wiki:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Qt4_binding
If you
Dani?l Mantione wrote:
But I'll leave this up to the Lazarus team. They have talented developers,
and I'm sure they are brainstorming about ideas to reduce the exe size.
However, Lazarus developers do the engineering balancing too and weigh exe
size against anything else.
Another
Marco van de Voort wrote:
Dani?l Mantione wrote:
But I'll leave this up to the Lazarus team. They have talented developers,
and I'm sure they are brainstorming about ideas to reduce the exe size.
However, Lazarus developers do the engineering balancing too and weigh exe
size against
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to ask and try CrossFPC. Where can I download it? How is it status,
is it still alive? Does it support FPC 2.0.4 and Turbo Delphi Explorer? Does
is support LCL? TIA.
You cannot download it. Due to copyright issues (it contained
Meanwhile, I'm sorry to say, we are almost halfway May, and we still
haven't seen anything. Looking at the article posted here about the Delphi
roadmap, I would say that Simon Kissel has decided to put his money on
Codegear anyway (I assume he's a businessman, so one cannot blame him
for that).
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
Meanwhile, I'm sorry to say, we are almost halfway May, and we still
haven't seen anything. Looking at the article posted here about the Delphi
roadmap, I would say that Simon Kissel has decided to put his money on
Codegear anyway (I assume he's
As far as I know, Lars is a FPC fan, and he merely wishes to express concern
about some of the issues he has with FPC
Yes I'm a fan.
It's not just the issues that I alone have with FPC since I'm not even an
embedded programmer myself.
IMHO this whole discussion has nothing to do with
I also complained and complained about websnap and asp and php, and of
course I also wrote some code
that solved my problem there which is all FPC based, the poor old wiki,
forum, and other utilities
on my site that need updating. Others choose the easy solution and use ASP
and
On 5/13/07, L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
folks agree with me.. many people on the pascal game devel BBS are saying
Lazarus is becoming huge
and slow.
This one is funny! :-)
I have used Delphi since D4 up till D7 in commercial development and
switched to FPC and Lazarus about 2 years ago. I
I also complained and complained about websnap and asp and php, and of
course I also wrote some code
that solved my problem there which is all FPC based, the poor old wiki,
forum, and other utilities
on my site that need updating. Others choose the easy solution and use
ASP
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Marco van de Voort wrote:
I also complained and complained about websnap and asp and php, and of
course I also wrote some code
that solved my problem there which is all FPC based, the poor old wiki,
forum, and other utilities
on my site that need
On 5/13/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which was the exactly what I meant to express.. Needs more continuous
struggle from people with a direct interest to not let the improvement rate
decrease.
Agreed 100% !
Not all at once, please. There is plenty of room for
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 5/13/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which was the exactly what I meant to express.. Needs more continuous
struggle from people with a direct interest to not let the improvement
rate
decrease.
Agreed 100% !
Hallo,
On 5/10/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently docs for 20 FCL units are generated, and the number is growing.
I do not put empty docs on the web, that's a matter of policy. Either
the unit is documented completely, or it's not documented at all.
Are you sure this
On 5/13/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I would like to ask that docs are put on-line, even if there is no
link from the website to them.
If Michael doesn't want to budge with his documentation policy, I will
be more that willing to generate the docs on a weekly or
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef:
Hallo,
On 5/10/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently docs for 20 FCL units are generated, and the number is growing.
I do not put empty docs on the web, that's a matter of policy. Either
the unit is documented completely, or it's not
Hi
First of all Thank you.
Here is my POC :
program qt_poc;
uses sysutils,qt4;
var
app : QApplicationH;
window : QWidgetH;
message_ : QLabelH;
text : WideString;
begin
app := QApplication_create(@argc, argv);
text := 'Hello World';
window := QWidget_create(nil,
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
We still need to maintain some Delphi based code and use Delphi 7 for
that. Now on the exact same PC, Delphi 7 takes 25 seconds to start
up. Lazarus takes a mere 2 seconds. Lazarus is still far from being
slow an non-responsive!!!
I guess that's Delphi 7 Enterprise
On 5/13/07, Den Jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Qt/Embedded binding is even easier to work with, due
to the OO wrapper. But due to the overhead it did not seem
usefull to me to create one for the LCL/Qt4 interface.
I think it´s possible to have both.
On the Symbian Port of Free Pascal I am
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schreef:
Hallo,
On 5/10/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently docs for 20 FCL units are generated, and the number is growing.
I do not put empty docs on the web, that's a matter of
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Hallo,
On 5/10/07, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently docs for 20 FCL units are generated, and the number is growing.
I do not put empty docs on the web, that's a matter of policy. Either
the unit is
You can find binding here:
http://andy.jgknet.de/oss/kylix/wiki/index.php/Qt3Clx
The binding on the pascal side are quite nice. You will have troubles
finding qtc (c binding for qt3). You most likely have to recompile
yourself.
Peter
On Sun, 13 May 2007 06:11:37 -0500, ik [EMAIL
developpers. On the other hand, say any stable fpc release should be
able
to compile (on win32), without trouble the entire VCL of say, delphi
2-5.
I don't see why that is a focus point. It's a nice testsuite, but until
it
is free, there is no real benefit in it. Specially since the
Op Sun, 13 May 2007, schreef Peter Popov:
Yes. The problem in this case is clear. Automated is deprecated andrarely
used functionality. (like e.g. dynamic methods).
Let me know if I can help in any way with automation RTTI compatibility? If
this feature is implemented (just the RTTI,
On 5/13/07, Micha Nelissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that's Delphi 7 Enterprise with loading all possible components
at startup ? So not entirely fair.
( Hear me: defending Delphi?? ;-) )
hehe... Your guess was correct. My Lazarus also has quite a few extra
component suites
If I do find something (I need to check my PC at work) then I'll send it
in private.
Thank you, Michael. :)
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
