At 16:39 +0200 19/6/06, Patricia Carmel wrote:
There was a disconnect between my first page, where the first figure appeared
and the next page, where the second figure appeared, which is why the second
figure thought it was the first one. The question was why: Autoconnect was
selected and the
At 15:20 +0100 21/6/06, Phil Heron wrote:
For your information, I removed the following fonts:
- Japanese (Heisei* and Koz*)
- Chinese and Korean (AdobeMingStd, AdobeMyungjoStd-Medium and
AdobeSongStd-Light)
- Symbol (AdobePiStd and SymbolStd)
Phil - I seem to remember reading somewhere that
I do use the Symbol font but it's the Microsoft TrueType one shipped
with Windows.
Consulting my archive, I see that Dov Isaacs sent a message to the list
on 25/10/04 stating:
(3) Yes. Some peculiar interaction between the PostScript driver and
Windows 2000 / XP / Server 2003 requires that
Under the Document menu there is an option Enable for Commenting and
Analysis in Acrobat Reader. You need to set this option and then save
you PDF.
A note of caution, once you have set this option you can't make any
further changes to the PDF, such as Document Properties options (the
same is true
Quick question- does anyone out there know if Acrobat's online reviewing
feature actually works with Reader (not the full Acrobat version)? We're
trying to get it work here, and even though Adobe's documentation claims
it should work with Reader, it only works for those who have the full
version.
I wonder if anybody can tell me if they have successfully imported PageMaker
files into Framemaker as advertised. Are the pages respected etc.?
I am about to upgrade and want to know the worst.
Robert C.-H. Shell
Extraordinary Professor of Historical Demography
UWC
Courier address:
Room 3,23
Thanks Richard- I see that I overlooked this one line about the Adobe
Document Server. I find it amazing that everyone else skated over this
fact- is it really that common to have this product installed? I'd never
heard of it until today. A co-worker here told me that the Lifecycle
Server product
We allow corrections and we don't use the server. You only need the
server if you want to use browser based reviews, which wouldbe
colaborative. That wasn't in the original question, was it?
We make the PDFs, send them to reviewers by email, they open locally
in Reader 7, then save it and send it
Neil Tubb wrote:
Fair point John. I guess I wasn't specific enough. We really
want the browser-based review option, because that is the
only way reviewers will be able to see the comments of other
reviewers online-- which helps to avoid multiple comments on
the same point. The email
Thanks Richard. I went through the same thing with the Adobe
site...until I realized that all of their various server products (Adobe
Document Server, Reader Extensions Server, etc.) are actually just part
of the Lifecycle Server product. Not that anyone thought to mention this
anywhere easily
Kevin Gibson wrote:
I would like to know if there are any new methods for converting RGB
blue (R=0, G=0, B=255) in Frame to CMYK upon output to PDF or via
Plug-in after the PDF is generated. We have been successfully
sending PDFs with RGB blue hyperlinks to our print provider for B/W
output
TW-885 Supervisor, Technical Publications - Staff - San Jose, CA
(Local Candidates Only)
Salary: BOE
A biotech firm in San Jose is looking for someone to coach other team
members and coordinate documentation writing and translation.
Reporting to the Manager of Technical Publications, as
All:
Some time before IBM released DITA to a puzzled and unsuspecting world, a
colleague of mine solved the problem of repurposing/reusing small
fragments of content using text insets. Basically, the components of a
book consist of shell files that contain nothing but text insets. This
At 16:39 +0200 19/6/06, Patricia Carmel wrote:
>There was a disconnect between my first page, where the first figure appeared
>and the next page, where the second figure appeared, which is why the second
>figure thought it was the first one. The question was why: Autoconnect was
>selected and
At 15:20 +0100 21/6/06, Phil Heron wrote:
>For your information, I removed the following fonts:
>- Japanese (Heisei* and Koz*)
>- Chinese and Korean (AdobeMingStd, AdobeMyungjoStd-Medium and
>AdobeSongStd-Light)
>- Symbol (AdobePiStd and SymbolStd)
Phil - I seem to remember reading somewhere
Hello fellow Framers,
Quick question- does anyone out there know if Acrobat's online reviewing
feature actually works with Reader (not the full Acrobat version)? We're
trying to get it work here, and even though Adobe's documentation claims
it should work with Reader, it only works for those
We use it. Remember, after you generate the PDF, you have to open it
in Acrobat 7 and select Comments -> Enble for Commenting and Analysis
in Adobe Reader.
> Quick question- does anyone out there know if Acrobat's online
> reviewing
> feature actually works with Reader (not the full Acrobat
And the reviewer needs to be using Reader 7.
Art
On 6/21/06, John Posada wrote:
> We use it. Remember, after you generate the PDF, you have to open it
> in Acrobat 7 and select Comments -> Enble for Commenting and Analysis
> in Adobe Reader.
>
> > Quick question- does anyone out there know if
I do use the Symbol font but it's the Microsoft TrueType one shipped
with Windows.
Consulting my archive, I see that Dov Isaacs sent a message to the list
on 25/10/04 stating:
"(3) Yes. Some peculiar interaction between the PostScript driver and
Windows 2000 / XP / Server 2003 requires that
Under the Document menu there is an option Enable for Commenting and
Analysis in Acrobat Reader. You need to set this option and then save
you PDF.
A note of caution, once you have set this option you can't make any
further changes to the PDF, such as Document Properties options (the
same is true
Yes, it does work. I use it all the time. But there are a few non-obvious
gotchas:
1) You must explicitly enable the commenting from Reader feature on
a file-by-file basis. In the full Adobe Acrobat tool, look in the Comments
menu for "Enable for Commenting and Analysis in Adobe Reader". When
you
Neil Tubb wrote:
> Quick question- does anyone out there know if Acrobat's
> online reviewing feature actually works with Reader (not the
> full Acrobat version)? We're trying to get it work here, and
> even though Adobe's documentation claims it should work with
> Reader, it only works for
The AdobePiStd font is a substitution font for ITC Zapf
Dingbats used by the PDF Library and by Acrobat when
PDF files call for ITC Zapf Dingbats but do not have it
installed. In the case of FrameMaker, it may be necessary
when PDF files are imported into FrameMaker.
It should NOT be removed as
> Quick question- does anyone out there know if Acrobat's online reviewing
> feature actually works with Reader (not the full Acrobat version)? We're
> trying to get it work here, and even though Adobe's documentation claims
> it should work with Reader, it only works for those who have the full
>
Along with John Posada's comment, look for a check box at
Send by Email for Review/Invite Reviewers/Customize Review Options/Also
allow users of Free Adobe Reader 7.0 to participate in this review
(Whew, that was a mouthful...)
-Matt Sullivan
GRAFIX Training & Consulting
www.grafixtraining.com
Thanks Richard- I see that I overlooked this one line about the Adobe
Document Server. I find it amazing that everyone else skated over this
fact- is it really that common to have this product installed? I'd never
heard of it until today. A co-worker here told me that the Lifecycle
Server product
We allow corrections and we don't use the server. You only need the
server if you want to use browser based reviews, which wouldbe
colaborative. That wasn't in the original question, was it?
We make the PDFs, send them to reviewers by email, they open locally
in Reader 7, then save it and send it
Fair point John. I guess I wasn't specific enough. We really want the
browser-based review option, because that is the only way reviewers will
be able to see the comments of other reviewers online-- which helps to
avoid multiple comments on the same point. The email and manual roll-up
into one
Neil Tubb wrote:
> Fair point John. I guess I wasn't specific enough. We really
> want the browser-based review option, because that is the
> only way reviewers will be able to see the comments of other
> reviewers online-- which helps to avoid multiple comments on
> the same point. The
Thanks Richard. I went through the same thing with the Adobe
site...until I realized that all of their various server products (Adobe
Document Server, Reader Extensions Server, etc.) are actually just part
of the Lifecycle Server product. Not that anyone thought to mention this
anywhere easily
TW-885 Supervisor, Technical Publications - Staff - San Jose, CA
(Local Candidates Only)
Salary: BOE
A biotech firm in San Jose is looking for someone to coach other team
members and coordinate documentation writing and translation.
Reporting to the Manager of Technical Publications, as a
If you're looking for the definitive list of shortcuts for *your*
installation of Frame, check out this plugin. This lists all shortcuts
defined by the default commands and any plugins you've got installed
(many that appear to be undocumented) .. typically over 30 pages worth.
32 matches
Mail list logo