Hello friends,
Can anyone of the Early Adopters tell me the build nr of the released FM-12 ? I
only know the last
beta/BM build: 329 (12.0.0.329).
And if you have access to the files: what is the date/size of the two files
fmdlg.dll, fmres.dll ?
Thank You for your help
Klaus Daube
Maxwell Hoffman said:
Here, I used 2 years as a duration model. Although it would probably be
longer and more expensive, since upgrades for FrameMaker don't seem to
occur every year now. Else I would have gotten at least one - sigh - during
my 2 years license upgrade contract that expired
Syed, I think your math is right on. I can't understand why anyone would
pay more for a subscription that will render their software useless the
moment they stop paying. If they fall on hard times, the perpetual
license lets them at least keep working with their software as long as
they can
After years with the same company, I'm just starting to re-invent myself
as a contractor. So far no one has asked for work in FrameMaker. If
they did, I'd have to consider my options. A thousand bucks is a big outlay.
On the other hand, I'd probably want it for no more than a month or two,
On 1/17/2014 1:31 PM, Mike Wickham wrote:
I've also bought every FM upgrade since version 6, except for v10,
which offered no features that I needed. I will be buying the FM 12
upgrade for sure.
Oops... there was a typo in there. I am using FM 10. It was FM 11 that
was the only version I
Hello friends,
Can anyone of the Early Adopters tell me the build nr of the released FM-12 ? I
only know the last
beta/BM build: 329 (12.0.0.329).
And if you have access to the files: what is the date/size of the two files
fmdlg.dll, fmres.dll ?
Thank You for your help
Klaus Daube
Maxwell Hoffman said:
> >Here, I used 2 years as a duration model. Although it would probably be
> >longer and more expensive, since upgrades for FrameMaker don't seem to
> >occur every year now. Else I would have gotten at least one - sigh - during
> >my 2 years "license upgrade" contract that
Syed, I think your math is right on. I can't understand why anyone would
pay more for a subscription that will render their software useless the
moment they stop paying. If they fall on hard times, the perpetual
license lets them at least keep working with their software as long as
they can
After years with the same company, I'm just starting to re-invent myself
as a contractor. So far no one has asked for work in FrameMaker. If
they did, I'd have to consider my options. A thousand bucks is a big outlay.
On the other hand, I'd probably want it for no more than a month or two,
On 1/17/2014 1:31 PM, Mike Wickham wrote:
> I've also bought every FM upgrade since version 6, except for v10,
> which offered no features that I needed. I will be buying the FM 12
> upgrade for sure.
Oops... there was a typo in there. I am using FM 10. It was FM 11 that
was the only version I
FYI -- some misunderstandings have occurred because the website uses the word
"upgrade" next to FM7: it is full product price, because there is no real
"upgrade" from SW that was released 12 years ago. Adobe did have an aggressive
discount to upgrade from FM7 to FM11 over a year ago. We
>Here, I used 2 years as a duration model. Although it would probably be longer
>and more expensive, since upgrades for FrameMaker don't
>seem to occur every year now. Else I would have gotten at least one - sigh -
>during my 2 years "license upgrade" contract that expired before
>FM 12 was
I upgraded to Framemaker 12 and tested it for XHTML and epub output for a
fairly complicated document that would choke Madcap Flare. It worked great.
Although the cost for upgrade is high, technical publishing software does not
have a huge user base and tends to be expensive. For instance, I
t part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20140117/9017c1ab/attachment.html>
14 matches
Mail list logo
