FrameUsers Admin
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:43 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: [Framers] Up for discussion: changing Framers' default Reply-To
behavior
In the "old days" of this list, it was expected that a poster would
summarize the comments received, especially any
I'm happy with Reply To All, but my email client lets me choose.
I do not, however, get my own name on my posts!
Cheers,
Theresa
P.S. Thanks Carol!
--
===
Theresa de Valence
t...@bstw.com
===
___
This message
I agree with Alan on all counts. I much prefer Reply-to-sender, for the
reasons he gives, but I can live with whatever you decide.
Best,
Johan
On 2017-01-26 20:23, Alan Houser wrote:
I _much_ prefer a default "Reply-To-Sender". Reasons:
- A default Reply-To-All is noisy. (I'll note that Caro
, January 26, 2017 7:43 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: [Framers] Up for discussion: changing Framers' default Reply-To
behavior
In the "old days" of this list, it was expected that a poster would
summarize the comments received, especially any that were sent
off-list. Thes
My vote is to have the default as the list. This is what is used in most
of my other mailing lists.
Thank you for asking.
Alan
On 27/01/17 7:43, FrameUsers Admin wrote:
In the "old days" of this list, it was expected that a poster would
summarize the comments received, especially any that wer
m: Framers
[mailto:framers-bounces+syed.hosain=aeris@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf
Of FrameUsers Admin
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 10:43 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: [Framers] Up for discussion: changing Framers' default Reply-To
behavior
In the "old days" of this l
I think most mailers have a modifier-key option that offers Reply to All.
IMO, this is the simplest solution. Some of us might have to learn that
alternate-fact key combination, but it would avoid unintentionally posting
to the list.
As to changing one's habits, it would be helpful if messages not
If that's possible, I vote for it.
In GMail, I habitually hit Reply All, delete any individuals, and move
the list address from CC to To if it's not there already.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:43 AM, FrameUsers Admin wrote:
> ... as List Mom, I'd like to change the default reply behavior to
> go t
I _much_ prefer a default "Reply-To-Sender". Reasons:
- A default Reply-To-All is noisy. (I'll note that Carol suggested that
we reply privately to her. Why is this thread special? :-> ).
- A default Reply-To-All _will_ cause private or embarrassing messages
to go to the list, from senders w
Got my vote - I keep forgetting to do "Reply All" and then hack off the OP's
address before posting.
From: Framers
on behalf
of FrameUsers Admin
Sent: January-26-17 1:43 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: [Framers] Up for discu
Interesting. I'm sure we'll get used to whatever the default is, but an
observation .. in my email client, Thunderbird, I have the option to
"Reply" which goes to the sender, and "Reply List" which goes to the
list. Apparently that's not a common feature? It's been so long since
I've used anoth
I would be happy to see Reply to All as the default.
Thanks for asking, and thanks for all that you do!
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:43 PM, FrameUsers Admin
wrote:
> In the "old days" of this list, it was expected that a poster would
> summarize the comments received, especially any that were sent
In the "old days" of this list, it was expected that a poster would
summarize the comments received, especially any that were sent
off-list. These days, most of us don't have time for that and we miss
so much good information that could help us all. I know that often
someone posts something tha
13 matches
Mail list logo