Re: Bad Autonumbers

a hard number to the autonumber in an individual file, it immediately responds with the correct value on the page, so apparently the tag and function are working properly. - What will fix these random bad autonumbers? - If I hardwire the bad autonumber (change it from P:000n+ to P:0008

RE: Bad Autonumbers

are working properly. - What will fix these random bad autonumbers? - If I hardwire the bad autonumber (change it from P:000n+ to P:0008, for example) with the following n+ numbers pick up normally (P:0009, etc., in this example)? This is crazy. It is just an autonumber. I've been using FM

RE: Bad Autonumbers

Randall C. Reed wrote: I cannot get a work package number autonumber to work properly in the files at the beginning of the book. P:000n+ just returns 0001. I've gone into the document menu on both the book and individual files and set the Page numbering feature to Continue. But the

RE: Bad Autonumbers

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the autonumber isn't a page number, it's a paragraph number. You need to set paragraph numbering to continue. Note, however, that this affects all paragraph autonumber series; you can't have, for instance, figure numbers restart while your package numbers

RE: Bad Autonumbers

PROTECTED]: RE: Bad Autonumbers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But the autonumber isn't a page number, it's a paragraph number. You need to set paragraph numbering to continue. Note, however, that this affects all paragraph autonumber series; you can't have, for instance, figure numbers restart while

RE: Bad Autonumbers

Fred Ridder wrote: But if you set the properties to Continue, it *is* possible to reset a specific paragraph numbering series by formatting a paragraph with an autonumber formula that explicitly sets the appropriate counter elements in the series definition to the desired values. Of

Bad Autonumbers

ntinue." Updated book > numerous times. Re-imported formats. When I add a hard number to the > autonumber in an individual file, it immediately responds with the > correct value on the page, so apparently the tag and function are > working properly. > > - What will fix th

Bad Autonumbers

an individual file, it immediately responds with the > correct value on the page, so apparently the tag and function are > working properly. > > - What will fix these random "bad" autonumbers? > > - If I "hardwire" the bad autonumber (change it from "

Bad Autonumbers

Randall C. Reed wrote: > I cannot get a "work package number" autonumber to work > properly in the files at the beginning of the book. > "P:000" just returns "0001". > I've gone into the document menu on both the book and > individual files and set the "Page" numbering feature to >

Bad Autonumbers

richard.combs at Polycom.com wrote: > But the autonumber isn't a page number, it's a paragraph number. You > need to set paragraph numbering to continue. Note, however, that this > affects all paragraph autonumber series; you can't have, for instance, > figure numbers restart while your package

Correction: Bad Autonumbers

Ouch! Can you tell I am exhausted??? Replace "page" with "paragraph", please. Does that make any more sense, or am I totally burned out beyond all belief? R. PS: Excellent point: I should have realized that ALL flavors of autonumbers will be treated the same. That doesn't solve my

Bad Autonumbers

To: Combs, Richard; Randall C. Reed; framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: RE: Bad Autonumbers richard.combs at Polycom.com wrote: > But the autonumber isn't a page number, it's a paragraph number. You > need to set paragraph numbering to continue. Note, however, that this > af

Bad Autonumbers

AMTo: Combs, Richard; Randall C. Reed; framers@lists.frameusers.comSubject: RE: Bad Autonumbers richard.combs at Polycom.com wrote:> But the autonumber isn't a page number, it's a paragraph number. You> need to set paragraph numbering to continue. Note, however, that this> affects all

Bad Autonumbers

Fred Ridder wrote: > But if you set the properties to "Continue", it *is* possible > to reset a specific paragraph numbering series by formatting > a paragraph with an autonumber formula that explicitly sets > the appropriate counter elements in the series definition to > the desired values.

Bad Autonumbers

bad autonumbers? - If I hardwire the bad autonumber (change it from P:000n+ to P:0008, for example) with the following n+ numbers pick up normally (P:0009, etc., in this example)? This is crazy. It is just an autonumber. I've been using FM for 13 years and I know it is not suppose to be this hard

Bad Autonumbers

tag and function are working properly. - What will fix these random "bad" autonumbers? - If I "hardwire" the bad autonumber (change it from "P:000<n+>" to "P:0008", for example) with the following <n+> numbers pick up normally ("P:00