Re: conversion table question

2008-10-20 Thread Jakob Fix
Thanks Rick, now that we've managed to structure error-free documents, we no longer get the Id attributes. Weird. Anyway, thanks for your reply, as usual! :) On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Rick Quatro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jakob, These Id and Idref attributes are usually created to

conversion table question

2008-10-20 Thread Jakob Fix
Thanks Rick, now that we've managed to structure error-free documents, we no longer get the Id attributes. Weird. Anyway, thanks for your reply, as usual! :) On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Rick Quatro wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > These Id and Idref attributes are usually created to facilitate

conversion table question

2008-10-16 Thread Jakob Fix
Hi, we're evaluating (rather successfully up to some point, I should say) the use of FM8 to structure an unstructured document using a conversion table. The one problem we encounter and can't pin down is the presence of an *Id* (Mixed case) attribute. We use an unstructured document without any

Re: conversion table question

2008-10-16 Thread Rick Quatro
Hi Jakob, These Id and Idref attributes are usually created to facilitate converting the unstructured cross-references to structured cross-references. There is no way that I know of to change this attribute name during the conversion. I use FrameScript to clean up the cross-references,

conversion table question

2008-10-16 Thread Jakob Fix
Hi, we're evaluating (rather successfully up to some point, I should say) the use of FM8 to structure an unstructured document using a conversion table. The one problem we encounter and can't pin down is the presence of an *Id* (Mixed case) attribute. We use an unstructured document without any

conversion table question

2008-10-16 Thread Rick Quatro
Hi Jakob, These Id and Idref attributes are usually created to facilitate converting the unstructured cross-references to structured cross-references. There is no way that I know of to change this attribute name during the conversion. I use FrameScript to clean up the cross-references,

Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lin Surasky
Hi all- I've decided to dive into Structured FM and see if I can make these Release Notes easier to manage. Since we don't yet have a need for markup, I'm starting with just the EDD so at least we'll have some of the benefits of a structured environment in place before we get other departments

Re: Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 12:11 -0500 23/5/07, Lin Surasky wrote: For now, the question is, what's wrong with my conversion table that I can't get the Description element to be wrapped properly around the paragraphs and lists that follow a CR Title? If I specify E:Para as the object(s) to be wrapped in the Description

RE: Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lester C. Smalley
Unless I am misreading the table (entirely possible, given the reformatting that this list forces), it appears that you do not have anything that is being mapped to the Para[CR] or List[CR] elements. And you say that the structure of a CR should be a Title, followed by a description. So that's

RE: Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lin Surasky
Hi, Lester- Do you have different tags for the paragraphs of a introduction, CR description? This would allow you to specify these in the conversion table separately (e.g. P:Intro maps to Para[Intro] and P:Body maps to Para[CR]) and then you can include the specific qualified para

Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lin Surasky
Hi all- I've decided to dive into Structured FM and see if I can make these Release Notes easier to manage. Since we don't yet have a need for markup, I'm starting with just the EDD so at least we'll have some of the benefits of a structured environment in place before we get other departments

Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Steve Rickaby
At 12:11 -0500 23/5/07, Lin Surasky wrote: >For now, the question is, what's wrong with my conversion table that I >can't get the Description element to be wrapped properly around the >paragraphs and lists that follow a CR Title? If I specify E:Para as the >object(s) to be wrapped in the

Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lester C. Smalley
Unless I am misreading the table (entirely possible, given the reformatting that this list forces), it appears that you do not have anything that is being mapped to the Para[CR] or List[CR] elements. And you say that the structure of a CR should be a Title, followed by a description. So that's

Structured FM: Conversion Table Question

2007-05-23 Thread Lin Surasky
Hi, Lester- > Do you have different tags for the paragraphs of a > introduction, CR description? This would allow you to > specify these in the conversion table separately (e.g. > P:Intro maps to Para[Intro] and P:Body maps to > Para[CR]) and then you can include the specific qualified >