Hello list,
I'm struggling a bit here with conditionals, specifically text containing
cross-references. The original unstructured book is 40 chapters and 14
appendices with all the other usual front and back matter. It is in
distribution as a PDF. Naturally it has a ton of cross-references
Best practice is to use a version control system such as Subversion.
Gives you the performance of local files, all the advantages of
network sharing, plus additional advantages.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 1:40 PM, rebecca officer
rebecca.offi...@alliedtelesis.co.nz wrote:
Hi Gary
That's
The only thing I know for sure (found while researching for my own problems
that
started the recent FrameMaker has detected a problem and must quit Really?!
thread is that 11004 means that you're running FrameMaker version 11 (like
you
stated).
The rest is a big secret.
-- Ken in Atlanta
File Project Settings Edit (conversion settings for FrameMaker
documents), select the paragraph style, check Pagination.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Nancy Allison ma...@verizon.net wrote:
I am creating a RoboHelp project out of a FrameMaker book. I can't find a way
to break the imported
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
On 20-Feb-13 10:01 AM, Helen Borrie wrote:
Hello list,
I'm struggling a bit here with conditionals, specifically text containing
cross-references. The original unstructured book is 40 chapters and 14
appendices with all the other usual front and back
Are you sure it's not generating the TOC and index? It thought Frame
updated whatever it could, even if some things were unresolved.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
Technical Writer
052-763-7133
On 20-Feb-13 10:01 AM, Helen Borrie wrote:
Hello list,
I'm struggling a bit here with conditionals,
Thanks Klause and Rick for your help. I
got it to work with the two drop-down lists. Here's the toolbar:
So far it's stable. It could be it's stable because of the limited
amount of things that I need on it.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
You can play around a bit with shading in the FM prefs, but it's pretty limited.
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Joel
Sent: February-20-13 8:50 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Frame 11 Appearance
I am on Windows
Under Edit Preferences you can
select the monitor size. That might sharpen the text on the tabs.
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
On 20-Feb-13 3:50 PM, Joel wrote:
I am on Windows 7, using Frame 11.
Ever since moving to Win 7 and Frame 11,
Hi Joel
I'm seeing this too (Frame 11, Windows XP), so it must be a Frame feature.
Very ugly indeed.
I prefer the old Frame 9 tabs, without the shadow, much clearer:
@Shmuel: changing the monitor preferences doesn't help in my case.
Cheers
--
Yves Barbion
www.scripto.nu
If the Pagination option for RH9 doesn't say Pagination (Split topic at this
level), or something close to that, you'll want to update to the latest patch
for RH. That patch helps many TCS linking issues
-Matt
Matt Sullivan
technical communication | online training | eLearning
twitter:
The Esc, E X shortcut expands/collapses the current element and its siblings.
-Matt
Matt Sullivan
technical communication | online training | eLearning
twitter: @mattrsullivan
phone: 714 960-6840
On Feb 20, 2013, at 8:35 AM, David Spreadbury dspre...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yves,
You can expand
I am pretty sure that is a frame thing. I went from Frame 9 to Frame 11
recently without changing my OS and I get that ugly font and shadow too. I
wonder whose idea that was! I hate it! It's really hard to read.
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
Me too! I truly dislike the dark, drab, low-contrasty appearance of
Frame and all the Adobe apps. Whatever happened to clarity,
readability, contrast, and the ability to size UI text for improved
accessibility? Even the best settings aren't good enough--it goes
from really low contrast and
I'm so glad other people have commented about their dislike of this
feature. I hate it too. But it isn't that the text isn't sharp,
it's that it has a white drop-shadow. Adobe, please make this go away
on the next version or tell us if we can change it ourselves. It has
made it very difficult
Consistent look feel across all Adobe products = equally bad UI for all ;)
-Original Message-
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Carol J. Elkins
Sent: February-20-13 1:55 PM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re:
Preach it, sister! #1 thing our team HATE about Acrobat X: the
Next/Previous comment buttons for PDF edits were taken away. Why,
Adobe, why?! It took considerable effort to convince our clients to
shift from an all-Word workflow to a Frame + PDF markup workflow,
then
Thank you for your answers Matt and David, but neither of your approaches
expands ALL elements, for example in an EDD.
--
Yves Barbion
www.scripto.nu
___
You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com.
Send list messages to
Framers -
Glad this topic has come up.
A few months back we were invited to offer opinions to one of the
engineers involved with UI design.
we had a 90 minute call; I came prepared with a long list generated
after only a short stint with FM11 -- my list had most of the same
complaints
Yves,
I don't believe there is a way to expand ALL elements. Only at each level of
indention.
From: Yves Barbion yves.barb...@gmail.com
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Expand all elements in the
At 11:42 p.m. 20/02/2013, Shmuel Wolfson wrote:
Are you sure it's not generating the TOC and index? It thought Frame updated
whatever it could, even if some things were unresolved.
I was hoping that would be so, but so far it is not. I'll persevere because
I'm not keen to throw the baby out
I wasn't going to say it. I really wasn't. I read the postings, and didn't
post. And didn't post. I tried so hard not to post. But I failed.
The ghastly thing that Joel posted was *so* reminiscent of circa-mid-1990s Mac
apps, when they were constrained to fake fonts like 'New York', with klunky
Yes, that was my gentle way of saying You're out of luck on that one
-Matt
Matt Sullivan
technical communication | online training | eLearning
twitter: @mattrsullivan
phone: 714 960-6840
On Feb 20, 2013, at 11:59 AM, Yves Barbion yves.barb...@gmail.com wrote:
id, but neither of your
Aha! That's what I suspected. And my original post was actually a gentle
feature request. ;-)
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Matt Sullivan m...@mattrsullivan.com
To: Yves Barbion yves.barb...@gmail.com
Cc: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Expand all elements in the
I have spent time with anyone on the TCS team I could find, complaining
about the UI for older eyes. It's a perfectly suitable UI for 25 year old
eyes and a perfectly wretched UI for older eyes. The low contrast tiny icons
are horrible and make my head hurt after an hour or so. Stronger contrast
On 20/02/2013 3:12 PM, Frank Stearns wrote:
Framers -
Glad this topic has come up.
...
Adobe does monitor this list, so perhaps seeing common expressions about
the same issues adds weight. Now, that doesn't mean a pile on; I
think/hope they've gotten the message.
Thanks very much for
Not going to do you that much good here – this list is an “under the radar”
channel that Adobe dips into occasionally – I’d throw it their way via the
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform page ;)
From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
Well .. I believe that the StructureTools plugin from WestStreet
Consulting does provide a command to do this ..
http://weststreetconsulting.com/WSC_StructureTools.htm
Grab the trial and check it out.
...scott
On 2/20/13 12:30 PM, yves.barb...@gmail.com wrote:
Aha! That's what I
At 10:37 a.m. 21/02/2013, rebecca officer wrote:
Hi Helen
Our books end up with thousands of hidden unresolved xrefs and they've never
been a problem.
If I'm reading this right, your TOC etc won't update, and you're blaming the
hidden unresolved xrefs. Right?
Well...more like assuming
For me, the so-called new and improved UI in FM 11 is why I generally still
use FM 8 for some of my older documents, and only start FM 11 when I have the
need for features in it.
The look and feel of the recent versions of FM are the worst (some good
features, but mostly bad) since I began
Hi everyone
I actually raised this as a bug with Adobe when I first saw FM11. It's worse
than just ugly for me; that drop-shadow's a bit of a migraine trigger. I'm
really hoping they'll make it optional!
Cheers
Rebecca
Carol J. Elkins celk...@awrittenword.com 02/21/13 7:57 AM
I'm so glad
Hi Helen
Our books end up with thousands of hidden unresolved xrefs and they've never
been a problem.
If I'm reading this right, your TOC etc won't update, and you're blaming the
hidden unresolved xrefs. Right?
I think the hidden unresolved xrefs probably aren't the problem. What evidence
About the network switch over. We have just done that and how well
applications play depends upon what protocols and configurations are set
up, and how switches are managed (oh so many variables).
Certainly, when we had Novell (which served well for decades) it had an
annoying habit of
Hello list,
I'm struggling a bit here with conditionals, specifically text containing
cross-references. The original unstructured book is 40 chapters and 14
appendices with all the other usual front and back matter. It is in
distribution as a PDF. Naturally it has a ton of cross-references
Regards,
Shmuel Wolfson
052-763-7133
On 20-Feb-13 10:01 AM, Helen Borrie wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm struggling a bit here with conditionals, specifically text containing
> cross-references. The original unstructured book is 40 chapters and 14
> appendices with all the other usual front and
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/61260119/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dcgiaaij.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3975 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
or a Windows
setting? Changing Windows settings hasn't seemed to affect this. Thanks,
Joel
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/855980ad/attachment.html>
-- nex
or a Windows setting?
Changing Windows settings hasn't seemed to affect this. Thanks,
Joel
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/d9c2a71a/attachment.html>
-- nex
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/54e3c529/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2515 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
scripto.nu
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/18506558/attachment.html>
s/framers/matt%40mattrsullivan.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/daa1c700/attachment.html>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/e779f89c/attachment.html>
eusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/76ad9e81/attachment.html>
scribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/matt%40mattrsullivan.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/2cd16247/attachment.html>
ttp://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/b326436d/attachment.html>
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 2515 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermai
Me too! I truly dislike the dark, drab, low-contrasty appearance of
Frame and all the Adobe apps. Whatever happened to clarity,
readability, contrast, and the ability to size UI text for improved
accessibility? Even the best settings aren't good enough--it goes
from really low contrast and
I'm so glad other people have commented about their dislike of this
"feature." I hate it too. But it isn't that the text isn't sharp,
it's that it has a white drop-shadow. Adobe, please make this go away
on the next version or tell us if we can change it ourselves. It has
made it very
Consistent look & feel across all Adobe products = equally bad UI for all ;>)
-Original Message-
From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
[mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Carol J. Elkins
Sent: February-20-13 1:55 PM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/d2280c58/attachment.html>
nts/20130220/77b66fe1/attachment.html>
Framers -
Glad this topic has come up.
A few months back we were invited to offer opinions to one of the
engineers involved with UI design.
we had a 90 minute call; I came prepared with a long list generated
after only a short stint with FM11 -- my list had most of the same
complaints voiced
.com
>
>Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
>http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/1d05c88b/attachment.html>
I wasn't going to say it. I really wasn't. I read the postings, and didn't
post. And didn't post. I tried so hard not to post. But I failed.
The ghastly thing that Joel posted was *so* reminiscent of circa-mid-1990s Mac
apps, when they were constrained to fake fonts like 'New York', with klunky
your approach
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/a46e8b77/attachment.html>
ur approach
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/cd504614/attachment.html>
://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/f4788694/attachment.html>
On 20/02/2013 3:12 PM, Frank Stearns wrote:
> Framers -
>
> Glad this topic has come up.
...
> Adobe does monitor this list, so perhaps seeing common expressions about
> the same issues adds weight. Now, that doesn't mean a "pile on;" I
> think/hope they've gotten the message.
>
Thanks very much
es Barbion mailto:yves.barbion at gmail.com>> wrote:
id, but neither of your approach
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/7db34ae7/attachment.html>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.frameusers.com/pipermail/framers/attachments/20130220/2a1c917c/attachment.html>
For me, the so-called "new and improved" UI in FM 11 is why I generally still
use FM 8 for some of my older documents, and only start FM 11 when I have the
need for features in it.
The look and feel of the recent versions of FM are the worst (some good
features, but mostly bad) since I began
60 matches
Mail list logo
