r success, it would have been stolen long back
>
> Regards,
> NJ
> http://www.neerajjain8.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Dov Isaacs
> To: "dr_go...@pobox.com"
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Sent: Wed, 11 August, 2010 5:26:02 AM
> Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a
On 11/08/2010, at 11:56 AM, Dov Isaacs wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Read the original thread. I am not going to repeat everything (and...
Umm Dov, I had the same reaction as you when I first saw them, I
think. But look at the date they were sent (25 July). These were the
ones that were sent back the
ram (often not a very pretty
site).
- Dov
From: Troy Fey [mailto:troy@opinicus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Dov Isaacs
Cc: dr_go...@pobox.com; Framers E-mail List
Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Dov -- I save all your responses. Thanks for your cont
ram (often not a very pretty
site).
- Dov
From: Troy Fey [mailto:troy@opinicus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:25 AM
To: Dov Isaacs
Cc: dr_gonzo at pobox.com; Framers E-mail List
Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Dov -- I save all your responses. Thanks for your c
r success, it would have been stolen long back
>
> Regards,
> NJ
> http://www.neerajjain8.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Dov Isaacs
> To: "dr_gonzo at pobox.com"
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Sent: Wed, 11 August, 2010 5:26:02 AM
> Subject: RE: Acrobat
Dov Isaacs
To: "dr_go...@pobox.com"
Cc: Framers E-mail List
Sent: Wed, 11 August, 2010 5:26:02 AM
Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Steve,
Read the original thread. I am not going to repeat everything (and
it was quite a lot) that was discussed on this forum a few weeks ago,
espec
aacs
To: "dr_gonzo at pobox.com"
Cc: Framers E-mail List
Sent: Wed, 11 August, 2010 5:26:02 AM
Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Steve,
Read the original thread. I am not going to repeat everything (and
it was quite a lot) that was discussed on this forum a few weeks ago,
espec
> Umm Dov, I had the same reaction as you when I first saw them, I think. But
> look at the date they were sent (25 July). These were the ones that were
> sent back then.
>
> Technology is working to raise your blood pressure.
Yep, looks like they were delayed from the server, though, because
they
> Umm Dov, I had the same reaction as you when I first saw them, I think. But
> look at the date they were sent (25 July). These were the ones that were
> sent back then.
>
> Technology is working to raise your blood pressure.
Yep, looks like they were delayed from the server, though, because
they
On 11/08/2010, at 11:56 AM, Dov Isaacs wrote:
Steve,
Read the original thread. I am not going to repeat everything (and...
Umm Dov, I had the same reaction as you when I first saw them, I
think. But look at the date they were sent (25 July). These were the
ones that were sent back then.
Johnson
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:10 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Show me in writing where Adobe says you should not install the same
> version of Reader and Acrobat on the same system. I cannot find it.
> It'
eve Johnson
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:10 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Show me in writing where Adobe says you should not install the same
> version of Reader and Acrobat on the same system. I cannot find it.
> I
cs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Since when? Is that by design or by accident? Doesn't installing
> Acrobat also install Reader?
>
> How many of my users have Acrobat installed? Of course I want Reader
> installed so I can see PDF
as [mailto:g...@hiskeyboard.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:57 AM
>> To: Dov Isaacs
>> Cc: Framers E-mail List
>> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>>
>> But, Dov---
>>
>> I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Since when? Is that by design or by accident? Doesn't installing
> Acrobat also install Reader?
>
> How many of my users have Acrobat installed? Of course I want Reader
> installed so I can see PDF
same version on a system is most unlikely to cause the
> symptoms described.
>
> - Dov
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinask...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:19 AM
>> To: Fei Min Lorente
>> Cc: Dov
Just to thanks all who replied to my post. I must've been having one of
those Fridays, as part of the mystery is now solved.
I am working on a windows machine running XPPro 2002 SP3. When installing
Acrobat 9 (v.9.3.3-CPSID_83708), I removed all prior instances of Acrobat
and Acrobat Reader as req
Hi Tori,
> Dov, we use this feature for 'testing' PDFs in which we have enabled
> Acrobat Reader rights. We have a lot of clients who simply will not
> spend the money to get Acrobat, so either we give them Reader-enabled
> PDFs or they send us <> hardcopy edits. No idea why, but
> sometime
invoking rather complex
>>> Javascript routines that invoke functions that are allowed in
>>> Acrobat but not Reader, other than font issues (you should NEVER,
>>> repeat NEVER, repeat once again NEVER generate PDF files with
>>> unembedded fonts), you should not see
Adobe has never understood how corporate IT departments work, and I've
come to realize that Adobe doesn't understand how corporations handle
multiple installations of Adobe products across a business network. Adobe
is focused solely on one installation on one computer handled by one
person who
Adobe has never understood how corporate IT departments work, and I've
come to realize that Adobe doesn't understand how corporations handle
multiple installations of Adobe products across a business network. Adobe
is focused solely on one installation on one computer handled by one
person who
Hi Tori,
> Dov, we use this feature for 'testing' PDFs in which we have enabled
> Acrobat Reader rights. We have a lot of clients who simply will not
> spend the money to get Acrobat, so either we give them Reader-enabled
> PDFs or they send us <> hardcopy edits. No idea why, but
> sometime
Just to thanks all who replied to my post. I must've been having one of
those Fridays, as part of the mystery is now solved.
I am working on a windows machine running XPPro 2002 SP3. When installing
Acrobat 9 (v.9.3.3-CPSID_83708), I removed all prior instances of Acrobat
and Acrobat Reader as req
But, Dov---
I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
"see it their way". The interfaces of the two are so different that
it's sometimes handy to be able to do this.
Would it be any less "NOT RECOMMENDED" if one had the Reader on a
removable drive (such as a U
t; and using Firefox 3.6.4 and IE 8.
>
> Fei Min Lorente
>
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Dov Isaacs
> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:39 PM
> To: Framers E-mail List
>
[mailto:guy at hiskeyboard.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:57 AM
>> To: Dov Isaacs
>> Cc: Framers E-mail List
>> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>>
>> But, Dov---
>>
>> I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
In terms of the ability to "see PDFs like they do," having Adobe Reader
on the same system as Adobe Acrobat is not going to assist you. In terms
of proper engineering and QA discipline, such testing should occur on a
system that has only the operating system installed, no "extra fonts"
installed
> In terms of the ability to "see PDFs like they do," having Adobe Reader
> on the same system as Adobe Acrobat is not going to assist you. In terms
> of proper engineering and QA discipline, such testing should occur on a
> system that has only the operating system installed, no "extra fonts"
> i
same version on a system is most unlikely to cause the
> symptoms described.
>
> ? ? ? ?- Dov
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinaski69 at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:19 AM
>> To: Fei Min Lorente
>> Cc: Dov
use
"Standard" and thus, you'd better fix them if you want usable
results!)
- Dov
-Original Message-
From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinask...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:10 AM
To: Dov Isaacs
Cc: Framers E-mail List
Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Show me
inal Message-
> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinask...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:10 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Show me in writing where Adobe says you should not install the same
> version of
inal Message-
> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinaski69 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 11:10 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Show me in writing where Adobe says you should not install the same
> version
.4 and IE 8.
>> >
>> > Fei Min Lorente
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
>> > [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Dov Isaacs
>> > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010
age-
> From: Guy K. Haas [mailto:g...@hiskeyboard.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:57 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> But, Dov---
>
> I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
> &q
age-
> From: Guy K. Haas [mailto:guy at hiskeyboard.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:57 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> But, Dov---
>
> I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I
ge-
> From: Art Campbell [mailto:art.campb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:55 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Dov,
>
> Although this takes the thread off-topic a bit, is there any way to
> configure Reader
ge-
> From: Art Campbell [mailto:art.campbell at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:55 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Dov,
>
> Although this takes the thread off-topic a bit, is there any way to
> configure Reader
quickly!)
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinask...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Since when? Is that by design or by accident? Doesn&
quickly!)
- Dov
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Johnson [mailto:chinaski69 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: Dov Isaacs
> Cc: Framers E-mail List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> Since when? Is that by design or by accident? Doesn&
t; and using Firefox 3.6.4 and IE 8.
>
> Fei Min Lorente
>
> -Original Message-
> From: framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com
> [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Dov Isaacs
> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:39 PM
> To: Framers E-mail List
&
hmm yes.
No point in complaining here. There are a few Adobe people but they
would have interest mostly in FrameMaker, except Dov.
I might also suggest you get in touch with Adobe Customer care if you
have a corporate license. Oh and don't expect anyone here to forward
your complaint for yo
But, Dov---
I have both installed so that when a reviewer runs into a problem, I can
"see it their way". The interfaces of the two are so different that
it's sometimes handy to be able to do this.
Would it be any less "NOT RECOMMENDED" if one had the Reader on a
removable drive (such as a USB
6.4 and IE 8.
>> >
>> > Fei Min Lorente
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com
>> > [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Dov Isaacs
>> > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:39
om
> > [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of Dov Isaacs
> > Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 11:39 PM
> > To: Framers E-mail List
> > Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
> > Importance: High
> >
> > I heard my name used in vain (if not on-line!).
l List
> Subject: Re: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
>
> You CAN have Reader and Acrobat at the same time. You CANNOT have two
> Acrobats; IOW, two PDF creators.
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Fei Min Lorente
> wrote:
> > Thanks, Dov! I was experiencing the same problem as Aliso
24, 2010 11:39 PM
To: Framers E-mail List
Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Importance: High
I heard my name used in vain (if not on-line!).
In terms of Alison's original posting ...
The symptoms you describe with regards to Acrobat 9 are not standard
Acrobat 9 behaviour. You did not post ex
24, 2010 11:39 PM
To: Framers E-mail List
Subject: RE: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
Importance: High
I heard my name used in vain (if not on-line!).
In terms of Alison's original posting ...
The symptoms you describe with regards to Acrobat 9 are not standard
Acrobat 9 behaviour. You did not post ex
I heard my name used in vain (if not on-line!).
In terms of Alison's original posting ...
The symptoms you describe with regards to Acrobat 9 are not standard
Acrobat 9 behaviour. You did not post exactly what Windows and/or
browser versions you are using, but we currently are unaware of any
no
I heard my name used in vain (if not on-line!).
In terms of Alison's original posting ...
The symptoms you describe with regards to Acrobat 9 are not standard
Acrobat 9 behaviour. You did not post exactly what Windows and/or
browser versions you are using, but we currently are unaware of any
no
hmm yes.
No point in complaining here. There are a few Adobe people but they
would have interest mostly in FrameMaker, except Dov.
I might also suggest you get in touch with Adobe Customer care if you
have a corporate license. Oh and don't expect anyone here to forward
your complaint for
You should post this on the Adobe forum.
In the paragraph "With Acrobat 9, I cannot..." have you tried
distilling using Acrobat 6 or 7 compatibility?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Alison White wrote:
> I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
> post my complain
I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any mainstream browser without it
(Acrobat + browser) failing completely (zilch). To get anything to happen
nt: Friday, July 23, 2010 4:19 AM
To: framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any mainstream br
Friday, July 23, 2010 4:19 AM
To: framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Acrobat 9 - a disaster
I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any ma
You should post this on the Adobe forum.
In the paragraph "With Acrobat 9, I cannot..." have you tried
distilling using Acrobat 6 or 7 compatibility?
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Alison White
wrote:
> I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
> post my complai
Alison White wrote:
> I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
> post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
On-forward? To anyone in particular?
> With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any mainstream browser without
> it
> (Acro
Alison White wrote:
> I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
> post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
On-forward? To anyone in particular?
> With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any mainstream browser without
> it
> (Acrob
I've just upgraded to Acrobat 9 and regret the decision. Not sure how to
post my complaints, so {sorry}. If you can on-forward, I'd be grateful.
With Acrobat 9, I cannot open a pdf inside any mainstream browser without it
(Acrobat + browser) failing completely (zilch). To get anything to happen
58 matches
Mail list logo
