Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

I wasn't around for the OOB version, so I don't know how much work needed to be done for the initial setup; I just know by anecdote that maintenance for both was apparently a PITA for the person responsible. > On March 13, 2014 at 2:33 PM Robert Lauriston wrote: > > > Are you speaking specificall

RE: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

etty straightforward to find the source of any problems. > > > > Regards > > Keith > > > > > > > > From: framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com > [mailto:framers-boun...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of > gr...@hedgewizard.net >

Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

Are you speaking specifically about PDF there? I found the web help stationery usable pretty much out of the box. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:47 AM, gr...@hedgewizard.net wrote: > ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats: ... > Finally: It takes quite a while to get t

RE: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

...@lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of gr...@hedgewizard.net Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:48 AM To: framers@lists.frameusers.com Subject: Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats: 1. It does not work on a remote Citrix desktop. (I

Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

t; From: "gr...@hedgewizard.net" >To: framers@lists.frameusers.com >Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:47:54 AM >Subject: Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher > > > >ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats: >1. It does not work on a remote Ci

Re: FM 12 + RH 11 OR WebWorks ePublisher

ePub is quite good at creating PDFs, but there are a couple of caveats: 1. It does not work on a remote Citrix desktop. (I suspect that it might have problems with others, but have no experience with them) 2. It *really* wants a modern system with lots of RAM (>8GB ) and drive space. It will work

Re: FM 12 + RH 11

As long as you're evaluating alternatives, you should check out WebWorks ePublisher. It can use Word, FrameMaker, and/or DITA as source and the output. I haven't looked at its PDF output since my source was in FrameMaker, but it kicked RoboHelp 10 to the curb as far as web help. On Wed, Mar 12, 20

Re: FM 12 + RH 11

Thanks for your comments, which I will share with my team.   In answer to your questions Robert: we have ATCS 5 (FM 12, RH 11) installed. I'm working on creating a FM template. We currently output to .pdf (from Word - ugh) and webhelp (from RH). We'd like to output to responsive html 5 and may,

Re: FM 12 + RH 11

What are you using now? An earlier version of FrameMaker? FM12 basically has most of RoboHelp folded in so you get two for one. To see what you'd lose with only RoboHelp, generate a PDF from RoboHelp and compare it with one saved from FrameMaker. Note that FrameMaker can save PDF with change mark

RE: FM 12 + RH 11

Unless you need PDF output or are using structured authoring, then there's no need to single source out of FM. As for tracking usage, if your help is on a web server (not a LAN server), you can check out the Adobe forums or RoboColum(n) (www.cmcandrew.com/robocolumn/