o:framers-bounces+dgcaller=earthlink.net at lists.frameusers.com]On
Behalf Of Bill Swallow
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in
Rebecca Officer wrote:
>According to Shlomo Perets' website
>(http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html) people have reported issues
>with FM7.x and Save As PDF when using Win98, or tagged PDF, or custom
>page sizes, or Acrobat 6.x.
>
>We seem to be fine with it, but we're not using any of the above.
Rebecca Officer wrote:
According to Shlomo Perets' website
(http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html) people have reported issues
with FM7.x and Save As PDF when using Win98, or tagged PDF, or custom
page sizes, or Acrobat 6.x.
We seem to be fine with it, but we're not using any of the above. ;-)
ll Swallow
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problem
amers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
> File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
I have not ha
allow
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 8:29 AM
To: Spreadbury, David
Cc: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience prob
Paul Grigg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
> over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
In FM 6, yup, a lot of disadvantages; somewhat fewer in later versions.
See http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html
for the full story.
I
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada wrote:
> We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
> writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it this way and we d
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
> File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
I have not had issues since 7.0. I believe it to be finally fixed. But
yes, 6.x and earlier was pr
s.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada wrote:
> We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use S
David...And I didn't just say it worked...I said it worked 100% of
the time without problems. In your experience, how is using Save As
-> PDF, in version 7.x, problematic?
In version 7.x, what problems have you experienced?
--- "Spreadbury, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I never said it did
David...And I didn't just say it worked...I said it worked 100% of
the time without problems. In your experience, how is using Save As
-> PDF, in version 7.x, problematic?
In version 7.x, what problems have you experienced?
--- "Spreadbury, David" wrote:
> I never said it didn't work, only that
EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
___
Yo
.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Grigg
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 12:06 AM
To: framers at omsys.com; framers at lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then dist
this way in Frame 6 or 7--though I
*have* had problems "saving as PDF".
HTH,
Chuck
Chuck Beck | Sr. Information Developer | Infor Global Solutions, Inc. |
Office: 614-523-7302 | Charles.Beck at infor.com
-Original Message-
To: Paul Grigg; framers at omsys.com; framers at list
Now that we use Frame 7 we've never had problems with Saving as PDF.
--Doug
> But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
> FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
> File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
Paul Grigg wrote:
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
In FM 6, yup, a lot of disadvantages; somewhat fewer in later versions.
See http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html
for the full story.
If yo
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
The information contained in this
amers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: Re: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out polic
We have a similar docs payload, and have custom job options that we
just load and run on save-as. Laziness has its benefits. :-)
On 7/17/06, John Posada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it this way and we don't
have any problems with Save As -> PDF.
> > But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions
> > of FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience pr
We're on 7.1 and 7.2. Out policy is to use Save As -> PDF. We have 10
writers maintaining almost 100 books doing it this way and we don't
have any problems with Save As -> PDF.
> > But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions
> > of FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience pr
But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
I have not had issues since 7.0. I believe it to be finally fixed. But
yes, 6.x and earlier was proble
Now that we use Frame 7 we've never had problems with Saving as PDF.
--Doug
But, in a nutshell, Save As PDF is problematic in all versions of
FrameMaker. You may, or may not, experience problems. Using Print to
File and then Distilling eliminates all of these problems.
this way in Frame 6 or 7--though I
*have* had problems "saving as PDF".
HTH,
Chuck
Chuck Beck | Sr. Information Developer | Infor Global Solutions, Inc. |
Office: 614-523-7302 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
To: Paul Grigg; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameuser
problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m] On Behalf Of Paul Grigg
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; framers@lists.frameusers.com
Subject: RE: Using SAVE AS PDF in FrameMaker 6.0
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using
Hi,
Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using the SAVE AS PDF function
over printing to a postscript file and then distilling?
Thanks, Paul
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTE
28 matches
Mail list logo
