Re: [Framework-Team] Re: first comments on plip 148 (moving to CMF 2.1)

2006-09-14 Thread Raphael Ritz
Martin Aspeli schrieb: Hanno Schlichting wrote: [..] Of course we still need to fix the current Archetypes mechanism to work with CMF 2.1. As we havn't deprecated it yet, we cannot brake it. With respect to just putting something (the ftis) into the ZODB in order to keep things working at a

[Framework-Team] Re: first comments on plip 148 (moving to CMF 2.1)

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Raphael, Of course we still need to fix the current Archetypes mechanism to work with CMF 2.1. As we havn't deprecated it yet, we cannot brake it. With respect to just putting something (the ftis) into the ZODB in order to keep things working at a minimal level this shouldn't be hard and I

[Framework-Team] Re: hard dependency on PIL?

2006-09-14 Thread Raphael Ritz
Hanno Schlichting schrieb: Alec Mitchell wrote: On 9/13/06, Raphael Ritz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's what I meant by saying earlier that PIL isn't necessarily trivial to install. But anyway, I consider my original question answered: it wasn't introduced on purpose in the first place but

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: first comments on plip 148 (moving to CMF 2.1)

2006-09-14 Thread Raphael Ritz
[sorry if this turns into a developer discussion which might not be exactly what you expect here. If I should move this to plone-devel just tell me.] Raphael Ritz schrieb: [..] With respect to just putting something (the ftis) into the ZODB in order to keep things working at a minimal level

[Framework-Team] review status

2006-09-14 Thread Wichert Akkerman
I figured a quick status update might be useful. At this moment we have four reviews in: PLIP 48 - session authentication PLIP 121/122/171 - AZAX and Bling PLIP 148 - CMF 2.1 PLIP 179 - commenting we have 11 days until we must have reviews for all bundles. That is less than two

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: review status

2006-09-14 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Rocky Burt wrote: On Thu, 2006-14-09 at 19:29 +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: I figured a quick status update might be useful. At this moment we have four reviews in: PLIP 48 - session authentication PLIP 121/122/171 - AZAX and Bling PLIP 148 - CMF 2.1

[Framework-Team] [PLIP 125 Link Integrity] - Review notes, part I

2006-09-14 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi guys, These notes are about PLIP125, Link Integrity. This PLIP contains two parts: - Warn users when they try to delete things that would break links - Warn users when they try to move things that would break links and/or update reference automatically and/or provide a redirect These

[Framework-Team] Re: [PLIP 125 Link Integrity] - Review notes, part I

2006-09-14 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:00:45 -0700, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - There is already a delete confirm page when you select the Delete action from the actions drop-down (I believe this used to be a JS pop-up). It'd be nice of the delete protection could be applied here so that

[Framework-Team] FW: Plone site compromise epidemic!

2006-09-14 Thread Alan Runyan
Alan Runyan Enfold Systems, Inc. http://www.enfoldsystems.com/ phone: +1.713.942.2377x111 fax: +1.832.201.8856 -Original Message- From: Sean Duffy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Plone site compromise

[Framework-Team] Re: FW: Plone site compromise epidemic!

2006-09-14 Thread Alexander Limi
It has been fixed, that's what the 2.5.1 and 2.1.4 releases were about. Full instructions are here: http://plone.org/documentation/how-to/clean-up-link-spam-on-your-site -- Alexander On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:54:25 -0700, Alan Runyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan Runyan Enfold Systems,

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: FW: Plone site compromise epidemic!

2006-09-14 Thread Alec Mitchell
To say these sites are compromised is a bit extreme. People who were allowed to create profiles (i.e. this only happens to sites where anybody can join) could take advantage of a minor XSS vulnerability to seed google requests. Additionally there was a apparently more common avenue of attack

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: FW: Plone site compromise epidemic!

2006-09-14 Thread Alexander Limi
Yeah, I just did a quick Google search and followed the first 150 links, and about 70-80% of the sites have already fixed this, and return a 404 when I follow the link (if you do this, remember to turn off JS first!) It's a minor issue, and I do think we nipped it in the bud before it

[Framework-Team] Re: Re: FW: Plone site compromise epidemic!

2006-09-14 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 18:07:45 -0700, Alexander Limi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I just did a quick Google search and followed the first 150 links, and about 70-80% of the sites have already fixed this, and return a 404 when I follow the link (if you do this, remember to turn off JS