Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
I think we're due a new features process. Perhaps we could start
soliciting PLIPs for 3.3 and get the review process organised at the
same time that we package up 3.2. I presume 3.2 won't have any PLIPs to
review (well, maybe one or two package related ones)
I'd love to join you all, if you're willing to let an interested
bystander horn in. ;-)
:jon
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
needs to be pitched.
I'd be willing to help, but lack the tech expertise to totally drive it.
:jon
--
Jon Stahl | Program Manager
ONE/Northwest
New tools and strategies for engaging people in protecting the environment
www.onenw.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
206-286-1235x15
http
-Original Message-
From: Wichert Akkerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Wichert Akkerman
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 12:03 AM
To: Jon Stahl
Cc: framework-team@lists.plone.org
Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] random thought: identify the components
that
lack owners
Scratching my own itch (thanks to Hanno for suggesting I look at the
component owner list in trac), I pulled together this list of current
component owners, sorted into owned and unowned.
COMPONENTS WITH TRAC OWNERS
Archetypes nouri
Catalogwitsch
Content
Martin-
Thanks for your comments; I will summarize and repost this to the dev
list for further discussion. Maybe I will even move this list to the
Plone Strategic Planning workspace at openplans so that we can edit it
collaboratively without creating chaos.
:jon
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Jon
Matt Bowen took on the PSPS 2008 task champion FWT process improvements and
now that the conference is over, he will have some free time, and has already
told me Steve that he is interested in picking this back up.
I'll try to draw Matt back into this conversation. ;-)
best,
jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:framework-team-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Aspeli
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:39 PM
To: framework-team@lists.plone.org
Subject: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP 244: Portlet management
improvements
Wichert Akkerman
okt 2008, at 01:29, Jon Stahl wrote:
One other thought to contribute to this topic:
Right now, the system renders all placeful portlets, then all group
portlets, then all type portlets.
Grouping is bad. Especially if you allow some form or ordering. No
user wants to be bound
Tom Lazar wrote:
On 28.10.2008, at 13:03, Alan Runyan wrote:
+1 to Hanno/Martin being Plone 4 release manager/communicator
same here!
I couldn't possibly imagine two more qualified people. Three cheers
for you both! :-)
:jon
___
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:framework-team-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wichert Akkerman
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:53 PM
To: framework-team@lists.plone.org
Subject: Re: [Framework-Team] Supported Plone Releases
Previously Jon Stahl wrote
Jon Stahl
President, Plone Foundation
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis
that can come from discussion of edge
East coast... summer... Ugh. :)
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
:jon
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Hi All-
I saw in the topic on FWT that 3.3b1 is tagged... yahoo! Thanks to all
of the folks who got code in there - it is really nice to see us making
small feature releases so regularly!
I am a little concerned, though, that our beta process is not getting us
the feedback we need. To but
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jon Stahl wrote:
I am a little concerned, though, that our beta process is not getting us
the feedback we need. To but it briefly: there's no easy way to get the
beta and try it out. I can't find any place to download it, or any
documented instructions
Google's Python folks have started an effort to significantly speed up
Python.
http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/
Should be interesting to keep an eye on.
:jon
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded Plone 3.3rc1. This is a first release
candidate, so please everyone: test the hell out of it!
If no critical bugs are found we will release this unmodified as
3.3 final in two weeks. If any changes are necessary we will
make another release
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 3/31/09 6:12 AM, Jon Stahl wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I have tagged and uploaded Plone 3.3rc1. This is a first release
candidate, so please everyone: test the hell out of it!
If no critical bugs are found we will release this unmodified as 3.3
final in two weeks
Eric Steele wrote:
Folks,
A gentle prod since Steve wants to have something to vote on by
Friday
There seems to be general agreement on the hybrid team idea. Can we
pare this down to a list of 7 people?
We currently have responses of:
available: Raphael (3), Ross (4), Matt (4)
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi there,
just read this article (in German) about a new attack pattern called
HTTP parameter polution and they mention Plone:
http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Nachrichten/Webanwendungen-mit-HTTP-Parameter-Pollution-angreifen
Anyone heard of this?
Eric Steele wrote:
I have little to add to what Hanno and Martin have stated so well
here. To me, what shortcomings the Trac-based approach may have are
trivial enough for me to largely overlook and can be covered through
some further integration work by the plone.org team and/or better
Absolutely. Getting the code into the Foundation's long-term
conservancy is very much worth doing if it's not too terribly hard.
I've not been through the process before of moving Collective code to
the Foundation, but I know Jarn has done this, so perhaps Geir can
enlighten us there on whether
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Wichert Akkermanwich...@wiggy.net wrote:
The whole point of the agreement and the conservatory is that we have a
solid legal basis. I would really like to see an informed legal opinion on
the requirements for moving existing code to foundation ownership.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Steele wrote:
#9263: Erik: Looks good. i18n:attributes=title be made implicit.
Important to re-add owner.
I don't know what that last comment means. If you mean we want the Owner
role on the sharing tab by
Hi FWT!
Per a brief conversation in #plone-framework tonight, I remembered
that back in October, while I was on sabbatical, I actually got around
to interviewing Joel Burton about how he thinks Plone could most
effectively be simplified for greater approachability. For what
it's worth, here are
Bravo!
Eric, can I suggest that you take the opportunity of the beta release
to send out an email from The Release Manager to the wider Plone
community in which you specifically remind add-on product developers
to test and update their add-on products, provide a link to the
upgrade docs (which
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Alexander Limi l...@plone.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:00 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
Thanks, Jon! I'll take care of this tonight. :)
Eric
On second thought, I'll hold off on this until we
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Geir Bækholt wrote:
On 23-03-2010 22.52, Alexander Limi wrote:
+1 to xdv as long as it gets a decent new name. ;)
YES! — And let's make sure to rename it soon, before it gets widespread
mainstream acceptance
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu wrote:
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:19 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
The following are ready for review:
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9472 - plone.app.registry
https://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/9473 - z3c.form
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Chris Calloway c...@unc.edu wrote:
On 9/26/2010 11:42 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Maybe think about killing WebDAV when we have these features: Offline
editing, magical wysiwyg blobby editing controls.
And mass upload/download:import/export of images/files/folders
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2010 22:55, Chris Calloway c...@unc.edu wrote:
On 10/6/2010 2:17 PM, Jon Stahl wrote:
We already have mass upload, via collective.uploadify.
We seem to have at least some work on mass download, via
Hey-
Congrats to all on landing plone.app.event. that is a really big deal that
has been a long time in the making!
-Jon
On Oct 23, 2013 7:43 AM, Rok Garbas r...@garbas.si wrote:
Quoting Nathan Van Gheem (2013-10-22 21:27:58)
33 matches
Mail list logo
