From: Ross Patterson
m...@rpatterson.net
To: Giacomo Spettoli
public-giacomo.spettoli-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w-wOFGN7rlS
/M9smdsby/k
...@lists.plone.org). Please include the name and
email of
the nominee as well as a note detailing experience with Plone and
some
reasons for wanting to join the team. Members will be selected by
current and emeritus team members.
Thanks,
Ross Patterson
Elizabeth Leddy
elizabeth.le...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Lads,
The board needs some official communication that the FWT supports the
pre-PSE sprint as a strategic sprint. The pre-PSE sprint will be
focused on on ripping out CMFFormController.
Any objections to supporting funding this?
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Martin Aspeli optil...@gmail.com wrote:
Works for me. Can we bring the Roadmap team too?
Absolutely, that sounds to me like a great improvement to the
tradition of the annual FWT meeting.
Ross
On 10 Oct 2012, at 10:29, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote
Yiorgis Gozadinos ggo...@jarn.com writes:
Hey!
We did not manage to meet this time either and it's been a while since
we had a meeting. Would it be possible to let people know ahead
whether we are having the meeting or not? Say for instance Eric or
someone else asking the day before? At the
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:13 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
Does anyone have items of significance for today's FWT meeting?
Otherwise, we can just cancel and wait for new PLIPs to look at.
How long can we wait before we don't
Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes:
How to do an initial PLIP review
I'm not even sure where to start here. Ideas?
- is it formatted correctly
- what dependencies would it introduce
- what backwards compatibility impacts will it have
(different for minor vs major versions)
-
Alec Mitchell ale...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu wrote:
Feel free to respond over email or just edit the
document: http://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/PlipProcess
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes:
Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members
think
+1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before
weighing in in.
Ok, so Eric I think we're a go. Lets
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
I'd like to get a final consensus on whether or not PLIP 9327 will be
included in 4.1. From discussion last week, several of you wanted to
hold out until we knew whether collections and search results would be
in. At this point, it looks like those two will
Elizabeth Leddy ele...@umich.edu writes:
Thanks for all the feedback guys! Curious what current team members think
+1, though I expected to gather more contradicting perspectives before
weighing in in.
Ross
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:44 PM, Wichert Akkerman
wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Timo Stollenwerk li...@zmag.de writes:
Hi,
Elizabeth came across a problem with p.a.discussion during her PLIP
review: Authenticated users are currently not able to post a comment,
they need the Member role to do so.
Do we also want authenticated users to be able to post comments? Shall
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
I'd like to have a quick meeting on Tuesday, Nov 9 to go over divvying
up the submitted implementations, set a deadline, and discuss the
merging of the Zope 2.13 and CMFPlone PLIPs.
Sounds good, gonna send out another Calliflower invite?
Ross
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
Let's plan on Friday night for a Framework Team dinner. FWT alumni are
invited, as well as whatever UI team members are here. I'd also like
to have Israel, as our de facto docs team leader, join us.
Any suggestions on a location?
I'll be there. Also, I
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
We've got 30 PLIPs in for 4.1 already
(http://dev.plone.org/plone/report/24), so it's time to get together
and start talking. Can I assume that next Tuesday at 14:00 UTC will
work, or should I set up another Doodle thing?
If that's the same time as the last
Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu
writes:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
What happened in the 3.x series, I thought the 3.0 team stayed on.
No. One member of the team stayed on from the 3.0 team for the 3.1
team. The 3.1 team then stayed the same
closer to being finished.
Shame. Shme.
We'd agreed that each of you would review a minimum of 6 PLIPs. Here's
the breakdown of what you've done so far vs what you signed up for:
David Glick 5 of 7
Calvin HP 0 of 6
Alec Mitchell 5 of 6
Ross Patterson0
on my OSX
Leopard.
See what you quoted below, I was replying to 9310, not 9309. :)
Ross
On Sep 10, 2009, at 1:20 AM, Ross Patterson wrote:
9309Better search for East Asian (multi-byte)
languages.
Matthew Wilkes
9310User registration process
You can find funkload load test benchmark reports and comparisons at:
http://weblion.psu.edu/static/loadtesting/plone4.0/plips.html
The buildout logs for the individual plips can be found with the same
name as the *.cfg file substituting .log for .cfg in:
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
Maurits van Rees maur...@vanrees.org
writes:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 05:52:52PM +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote:
This is really good stuff!
I must admit, I don't understand the graphs or the tables-of-graphs
at all, though. Is there a quick
than anything else I have at my disposal.
Ross
On Sep 6, 2009, at 5:03 AM, Ross Patterson wrote:
You can find funkload load test benchmark reports and comparisons at:
http://weblion.psu.edu/static/loadtesting/plone4.0/plips.html
The buildout logs for the individual plips can be found
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
writes:
On 7/27/09 1:38 PM, Rob Gietema wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on TinyMCE for Plone 4 and would like some
feedback on two issues:
1) The current code base is located in the Collective. Since TinyMCE
will be the default editor in Plone 4 should
Hi Laurens,
Your PLIP #9305 (Use real names instead of usernames) has been accepted
by the FWT and I volunteered to oversee this PLIP. Can you log into
trac and accept the PLIP ticket there and comment to confirm that you
intend to implement this PLIP?
Thanks!
Ross
Hi Maurits,
Your PLIP #9214 (support logins using e-mail address instead of user id)
has been accepted by the FWT and I volunteered to oversee this PLIP.
Can you log into trac and accept the PLIP ticket there and comment to
confirm that you intend to implement this PLIP?
Thanks!
Ross
Since there are some of us on the FWT that want to follow all PLIP
activity and some of us who find that it's too much noise, we thought we
might start a PLIP activity list. This list would be copied on all
trac PLIP activity.
Steve, can you set us up with a list?
Plone admins, is there a more
Eric Steele ems...@psu.edu writes:
* Timing of call is somewhat inconvenient for some. We'll see if we
can reschedule. New poll at
http://www.doodle.com/zf9hkvyexzgi98tt,please fill out before next
week. We'll meet weekly from now on.
My availability is in there now.
Thanks!
Ross
Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
writes:
rant
Well, I really hate having default content around, that I have to
delete all the time and people use in tests that later on break if we
change it. The initial content just won't make sense for many sites
and people waste huge amount of
Joel Burton j...@joelburton.com writes:
I don't know what the discussion was like in deciding on this date. It
may still be the right decision to have it end now. I'm just
suggesting that, if it seems that quite a few people may think that
this is a slightly-too-soon date, that you may
Matthew Wilkes
matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk writes:
On 20 Jun 2009, at 19:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
Isn't 4.0 deliberately a short-hop release, with minimal new
feautres,
mostly intended to move the platform forward (to modern versions of
Zope, Python, CMF)? Keeping the window short emphasizes
Calvin Hendryx-Parker cal...@sixfeetup.com
writes:
Here is the link we used to start this process:
http://www.doodle.com/ucb3w2fcqieken28
Based on the responses, generally folks are available Monday and
Tuesday at 2:00PM US/Eastern time. This works for me, how about the
rest?
Good by me.
Raphael Ritz raphael.r...@incf.org writes:
Eric Steele wrote:
Since the new Plone 4 is looking like, essentially, a transitional
release, another possibility would be to pull its framework team
members from each of the currently-existing teams.
I'm with Eric here and offer to
Andreas Zeidler a...@zitc.de writes:
On May 5, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Ross Patterson wrote:
BLOBs: Has the backups/repozo story been sufficiently worked out?
this will need a good backup story, but it won't be via repozo.
repozo was meant to backup a single data.fs, but not your entire
zodb
Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com
writes:
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 22:05, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Sorry if I'm resurrecting an already fairly resolved debate. None of
the concerns I raise here are enough to vote -1 one calling it
4.0. But if enough people feel as I do here
JoAnna Springsteen jluv...@gmail.com
writes:
So could a team be formed or delegated with the responsibility of
reviewing Plone messaging? Would such an institution be a slippery
slope to too much dogma or other stifling restriction? What might be
some other ways to improve messaging in
Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net
writes:
I have tagged and uploaded Plone 3.3b1. This is a first beta release, so
please everyone: test the hell out of it!
Unless any unexpected problems surface I intend to make a release
candidate release in 3 weeks.
I just wanted to draw attention to
Israel Saeta Pérez dukeb...@gmail.com
writes:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Ross Patterson
m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower
circles to free it up for prototyping, visioning
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Thanks for taking the initiative here.
I'll not gonna make it to todays tune-up nor the conf call, though :(
Four of us (calvinhp, ErikRose, ErikRose, zenwryly) made it to the
meeting and came up with a few things to act on. I'll briefly
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
The last item concerned future meetings. When should we do this
meeting in the future? Every other week or every third work?
Thursday? Friday? Would all of the FWT members weigh in with both
preferences and outright scheduling conflicts
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis that
can come from discussion of edge
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
Matthew Wilkes wrote:
I've tried to include all the relevant possible times in this, let me
know if there's another I should add.
I'll be at PyCon in that week and have no idea what my time schedule is
going to be. I'll try to join on whatever
Jon Stahl j...@onenw.org writes:
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
So far, much of the Plone 4 work has happened in narrower circles to
free it up for prototyping, visioning, and imagining new approaches.
This has been in part to isolate such a process from the paralysis
Jon Stahl j...@onenw.org writes:
East coast... summer... Ugh. :)
East coast is significantly easier for the Europeans, both in travel
time and intensity of jetlag. But all is open to discussion. They
rallied to CA for the PSPS. :-)
Just to be clear that was an utterly petty response
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
The exact way to involve the UI and documentation team needs to be
defined. I think we should write up the process first and then sent it
for comments to the two others team. We can incorporate their feedback
in terms of when and how they like to
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu
writes:
- Plone 4 will be primarily a feature based release, not time-based
...
- Plone 4 will be released based on an agile approach
+1 I like this approach a lot. I've been worrying about how to be
ambitious while still ensuring that Plone 4.0 is
Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com writes:
Ross Patterson wrote:
Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com writes:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- Plone 4 will have a documented upgrade story
A migration from Plone 3 to 4 does not need to be possible in an
almost fully automated fashion. We need
Tom Lazar li...@tomster.org writes:
On 18.12.2008, at 11:48, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 12/18/08 11:43 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based on those factors.
i think that conclusion is the only part where we
Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net writes:
Tom Lazar li...@tomster.org writes:
On 18.12.2008, at 11:48, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 12/18/08 11:43 AM, Tom Lazar wrote:
and therefore should be reflected in the membership of the
group which makes decisions based on those factors.
i think
Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a general point, it's almost never necessary to cross-post to the
plone-devel and plone-framework lists. The framework team uses the
latter to discuss their business, and some of the more tactical
how-to-we-manage-the-release-process discussions
Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I posted to framework because it was one of the only places I found any
previous discussion of five.intid. I will not post to the framework
list again.
I didn't say that. :) We don't mind non-framework-team members posting
there, especially if it's
whit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ross, let me know if there is anything I can do to help you with a
release(or if you need me to make one). fiancé is out of town this
weekend and I'm going to dedicate an evening or two to stuff like
this.
Firstly, I just want to reiterate that merging this
I need five.intid in Plone 3.0 so I started a branch that is compatible
with five.localsitemanager as is used in Plone 3.0/Zope 2.10:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/five.intid/branch/localsitemanager/
Is there any interest in integrating this into five.intid/trunk? If so
I'd be happy to
51 matches
Mail list logo
