Hi guys,
I guess this is why we exist, so... I think we should discuss a bit what kind
of things we'd *like* to see PLIPed, discussed and possibly included in Plone
3.0.
There are a few UI PLIPs that limi has assigned:
#116 -- Large folder UI improvements: make large folders have a search
in
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi Martin, hi fellow co-frameworkers,
I guess this is why we exist, so... I think we should discuss a bit what kind
of things we'd *like* to see PLIPed, discussed and possibly included in Plone
3.0.
I thought that we are more on the reviewer's side but an
I'll paste the comments I've added to the plips themselves. But I'd
like to first mention as a disclaimer that any new functionality being
built into Plone 3.0 that "does not" use Zope 3 style development
techniques (unless the feature isn't really code level or something
such) gets an automatic v
Hi all.
Thx Martin for starting this thread ;)
Before going into details I would like to note some time constraints, as
we agreed on having time and not feature based releases, so we get some
feeling what might be feasible in the time we have:
Plone 2.5
-
January 2006, feature / proposal
just to piggy back a bit on this:
I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(the technology is
not far off as we stand now).
My personal feeling(s
Raphael Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought that we are more on the reviewer's side but anyway
> we should have an opinion.
I don't think that means we can't discuss what we'd like to see in the big
picture, though. :)
Perhaps this is more appropriate on plone-dev - if you think so, I'
On Monday 13 March 2006 09:18, whit wrote:
> just to piggy back a bit on this:
>
> I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
> want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
> ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(the technology is
> not
On Monday 13 March 2006 03:15, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I guess this is why we exist, so... I think we should discuss a bit what
> kind of things we'd *like* to see PLIPed, discussed and possibly included
> in Plone 3.0.
>
> There are a few UI PLIPs that limi has assigned:
>
> #116 -- L
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At best, this
offers an opportunity to rethink how we want to work with UI as
developers, designe
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At best, this
offers an opportunity to rethink how we want to work with UI a
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:08:11 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Helge Tesdal wrote:
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 18:18:20 +0100, whit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My personal feeling(somewhat reinforced by what I saw at the symposium)
is that our ui layer is on a crash course with it's self. At bes
Rob Miller wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:03:52PM -0800, Rob Miller wrote:
| hmm... not sure i can, actually. i'm very interested in getting this
| working, and i'll provide guidance and help, of course, but i expect
| i'll be pretty busy
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:42 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:35:27PM -0600, whit wrote:
| was there a non-marshall based IO piece suggested? iirc, everything
| talked about so far is based on marshall.
There's a product for CSV import or something like that somewhere
in the
On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:13 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Agree. That said, PlonePortlets are about more than that - they make portlets
> into proper content types that can be workflowed, and have permissions for
> things like who sees them in what contexts. I think some brainstorming with
> Gei
On Mar 13, 2006, at 9:41 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Raphael Ritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Add bulk export here as well.
My number one use case for this is actually migration.
Imagine getting rid of in-place migrations by simply dumping your
content from the old site as some XML file and import
Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > #117 -- Folder contents improvements: sticky ordering, drag-and-drop
> > ordering. See also: http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/101
>
> Read this a couple of times and I'm still not "getting" the sticky talk.
I think it just means that you say "t
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 02:35:27PM -0600, whit wrote:
| was there a non-marshall based IO piece suggested? iirc, everything
| talked about so far is based on marshall.
There's a product for CSV import or something like that somewhere in the
collective that doesn't use Marshall. Not sure what XMLF
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:03:52PM -0800, Rob Miller wrote:
| hmm... not sure i can, actually. i'm very interested in getting this
| working, and i'll provide guidance and help, of course, but i expect
| i'll be pretty busy focusing on member management and general cmf 2.X
| related stuff, t
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:18:20 -, whit
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
just to piggy back a bit on this:
I think one consideration that needs to be made is how much you guys
want to start pursuing new style development. By the time Plone 3
ships, CMF 2.0 will have full customization of views(th
If we move to a meld like solution we may well end up having nobody who
wants
to work on presentation logic. I certainly have no interest in using
python
to manipulate an XML tree in order to do the equivalent of a tal:repeat.
Yep. This is basically why I think Meld is a slightly dangerou
On Mar 13, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:03:52PM -0800, Rob Miller wrote:
| hmm... not sure i can, actually. i'm very interested in getting
this
| working, and i'll provide guidance and help, of course, but i expect
| i'll be pretty busy focusing on mem
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:03:52 -, Rob Miller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. I'm hoping Rob Miller will champion this, since he seems to be
leading
the effort around GenericSetup and was talking about the benefits of it
for
migrations. Marshall, xmlio, GenericSetup, ArcheCSV ... there nee
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:21:42 -, Sidnei da Silva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The advice I can provide here is that any framework that doesn't use
Archetypes marshallers is a waste of effort.
'Marshall' the product just enables to multiplex Archetypes 'marshall'
by moving policy about what m
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:51:38 -, Rocky Burt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-13-03 at 18:13 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Agree. That said, PlonePortlets are about more than that - they make
portlets
into proper content types that can be workflowed, and have permissions
for
things
24 matches
Mail list logo
