Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi Framework Team,
We haven't seen any official dates for PLIP freeze, bundles,
alpha/beta/RC/final from you yet for 3.0.
Can you see if you can get some dates down asap, so we can start
communicating them to people?
Maybe I should be doing that, ey? :)
Hanno, as the
Previously Rob Miller said:
> for the record, i'm actually -100 on using cubed, or anything else w/o
> "plone"
> in it. if we produce good, reusable software that is generally applicable
> beyond our immediate CMS needs and we don't call it plone.something, then
> i
> think we've lost a significa
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Rob Miller said:
for the record, i'm actually -100 on using cubed, or anything else w/o
"plone"
in it. if we produce good, reusable software that is generally applicable
beyond our immediate CMS needs and we don't call it plone.something, then
i
think we've lo
Martin Aspeli schrieb:
Hi Martin
I'd like to give Helge and Raphael a chance to reply, too, first, but
I'll do it, say, over the weekend?
and here are mine:
1. cubed / plone -> -1
2. plone / plone.app -> +1
3. plone / plone.cms -> 0
Raphael
PS: actually I did reply right away but only to
Hi Martin.
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
If nobody disagrees with anything in general I would like to get
simple -1/0/+1 votes for all of the three alternatives. The option
with the highest positive number should obviously win. If we don't get
a clear result I would let Marti
Raphael Ritz wrote:
PS: actually I did reply right away but only to Hanno as I didn't
notice that the reply-to header wasn't set to the list :-(
Uhm, sorry. I always use reply-all as in my experience most people don't
set proper reply-to headers.
But I promise to better myself ;)
Hanno
_
-1 cubed / plone
+1 plone / plone.app
-1 plone / plone.cms
--
Helge Tesdal
Plone Solutions
___
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
Hi guys, > August 21, proposal freeze (review bundles must be ready)I don't think this is too bad - perhaps push back by 2 week or so, but definitely start getting the word out now and make people start acting.
> September 25, feature freeze (all features have been merged)This worries me more. How
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 01:54 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Rob Miller wrote:
> > Martin Aspeli wrote:
> >> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> >>
> >>> If nobody disagrees with anything in general I would like to get
> >>> simple -1/0/+1 votes for all of the three alternatives. The option
> >>> with the hi
(Repost as the message didn't seem to get through...)
Hi.
Our busy time seems to start ;)
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alexander Limi wrote:
Hi Framework Team,
We haven't seen any official dates for PLIP freeze, bundles,
alpha/beta/RC/final from you yet for 3.0.
Can you see if you can get some da
Ok, here's the result:
Counting only the FWT members:
cubed / plone 0
plone / plone.app +5.5
plone / plone.cms 0
All votes:
cubed / plone -2
plone / plone.app +6.5
plone / plone.cms 0
I guess this is a clear result and we would all love to see Martin write
one
Hi Hanno,I'm happy to write the plone / plone.app announcement, and I can write the bit about guidelines for when to use them. However, I'm not too sure how we do the svn organisation. - are we recommending people use ZopeSkel?
- with what options? - how should they do the import?I'd love for us t
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Hanno,
I'm happy to write the plone / plone.app announcement, and I can write
the bit about guidelines for when to use them. However, I'm not too
sure how we do the svn organisation.
- are we recommending people use ZopeSkel?
cautious but enthusiastic non-fwt +1 here
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:46 -0500, whit wrote:
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
> > Hi Hanno,
> >
> > I'm happy to write the plone / plone.app announcement, and I can write
> > the bit about guidelines for when to use them. However, I'm not too
> > sure how we do the svn organisation.
> >
> > - are we rec
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:29:41 -0700, Daniel Nouri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 for plone / plone.cms as it is confusing ("heck, isn't all of Plone
for CMS 'functionality'?")
It might not be in the future. An example would be a dedicated
deployment solution, a document
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:29:41 -0700, Daniel Nouri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 for plone / plone.cms as it is confusing ("heck, isn't all of Plone
for CMS 'functionality'?")
It might not be in the future. An example would be a dedicated
deployment solution, a document
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Hanno,
I'm happy to write the plone / plone.app announcement, and I can write
the bit about guidelines for when to use them. However, I'm not too
sure how we do the svn organisation.
- are we recommending people use ZopeSkel?
cautious but enthusiastic no
Daniel Nouri wrote:
whit wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi Hanno,
I'm happy to write the plone / plone.app announcement, and I can
write the bit about guidelines for when to use them. However, I'm not
too sure how we do the svn organisation.
- are we recommending people use ZopeSkel?
cautiou
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 03:49:43 -0700, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
September 25, feature freeze (all features have been merged)
This worries me more. How complete must a review bundle be?
I'd like to put the bar at "useful and achievable". That is, we should
recommend a bundle if i
19 matches
Mail list logo
