Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Hi Wichert, I have gone over all the current reviews and divided them into three sections: PLIPs ready for merging, PLIPs which need more work and not yet reviewed PLIPs. Here we go: Great, thank you! PLIPs ready for merging --- PLIP 8 - Versioning

Re: [Framework-Team] PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote: > > PLIP 171 - KSS / Azax to Plone > > > > KSS/Azax are well designed and have very active developers. It is > > designed > > with developers in mind instead of copying patterns used by other > > frameworks. > >

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does need some more disucssion, but I also considered it important to at least give some signal to indicate in which direction the consensus seems to be going. It might even get Ben to fix the Bling bundle...

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The other thing that's not here is the new workflows that Vincenzo said he'd look at. There's no bundle, but it's just a set of new workflows + possibly a control panel. This is also quite important - Plone's OOTB

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging Viewing a locked front page gave an error until the page was checked in. I was working with a customer, deploying iterate and CMFEditions earlier

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging > > > > Viewing a locked front page gave an error until the page was checked > > in. > > I was working with a

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alec Mitchell
On 10/5/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Previously Alexander Limi wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 16:53:06 -0700, Wichert Akkerman > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > PLIP 168 - integrate iterate for checkin/checkout/staging > > > > Viewing a locked front page gave an error until t

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Alexander Limi wrote: On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 01:12:54 -0700, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This does need some more disucssion, but I also considered it important to at least give some signal to indicate in which direction the consensus seems to be going. It might even get Ben to fi

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On 10/5/06, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [.. long list ..] Thank you in advance for filing those at http://plone.org/products/cmfeditions/issues ;) They are iterate issues, and they have already been "filed" with Kapil. ;) — Alexander __

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Alexander Limi
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:59 -0700, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: They do, and the decision has not been made yet, partially due to this. However, it is fairly telling that we've now got two dedicated core developers regularly improving the KSS bundle in response to feedback, a

[Framework-Team] Re: PLIP review overview

2006-10-05 Thread Martin Aspeli
Alexander Limi wrote: On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 13:06:59 -0700, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: They do, and the decision has not been made yet, partially due to this. However, it is fairly telling that we've now got two dedicated core developers regularly improving the KSS bundle in re