Florian Schulze wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:59:29 +0100, Alexander Limi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:20:48 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note, plone.app.redirector does not have a UI like RedirectionTool
does for adding specific redirects, but adding
On 12/28/06, Florian Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dang! I knew this was coming. I thought about this for some time now and
didn't find a good solution to add a tab here which is not Schema based.
There was a thread on archetypes-devel about making interfaces and
adapters for Schema and Fiel
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 06:59:29 +0100, Alexander Limi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:20:48 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note, plone.app.redirector does not have a UI like RedirectionTool does
for adding specific redirects, but adding the necessary forms
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 08:20:48 -0800, Martin Aspeli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note, plone.app.redirector does not have a UI like RedirectionTool does
for adding specific redirects, but adding the necessary forms would be
fairly trivial (it'd just need to talk to the IRedirectionStorage local
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Dec 27, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alexander Limi wrote:
Yup, /@@login wouldn't be any easier to remember than /login_form -
so either /login or /admin. I'm partial to the latter, since it makes
sense in more languages (most western languages have the word
On Dec 27, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Alexander Limi wrote:
Yup, /@@login wouldn't be any easier to remember than /login_form
- so either /login or /admin. I'm partial to the latter, since it
makes sense in more languages (most western languages have the
word "admin" or "adminis
Alexander Limi wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:59:18 -0800, Rocky Burt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"*" would be the way to go imho.
We should probably make 'login' a new "reserved" id though so people
don't create content with the name 'login'. This way /login would
always do as designed and we
On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:59:18 -0800, Rocky Burt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"*" would be the way to go imho.
We should probably make 'login' a new "reserved" id though so people
don't create content with the name 'login'. This way /login would
always do as designed and we wouldn't have to worr
On Wed, 2006-27-12 at 15:54 +0100, Martin Aspeli wrote:
> Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> > On 12/27/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> We could make a nicer implementation, by having a view with name @@login
> >> registered for the portal root. /login (or /@@login, to disambiguate)
> >> wo
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On 12/27/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We could make a nicer implementation, by having a view with name @@login
registered for the portal root. /login (or /@@login, to disambiguate)
would then only be available on the site root. I suggest we still
redirect t
On 12/27/06, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We could make a nicer implementation, by having a view with name @@login
registered for the portal root. /login (or /@@login, to disambiguate)
would then only be available on the site root. I suggest we still
redirect to /login_form e.g. with
Alexander Limi wrote:
Framework Team,
Any objections on including this in 3.0?
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/84
It's something we wanted in 2.1 back in the day, but since none of us
knew how GRUF worked or would interact with it, we ended up not doing it
to make sure.
Having a si
12 matches
Mail list logo
