On Jan 30, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
FYI i have completed my two remaining reviews and have additionally
reviewed #243 which was without a review.
as a status update: i've completed all but one (247), but won't get
around to do the last in time. i'm simply too tired to keep going.
On 1/31/09 2:18 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
i've updated my local buildout and the the site works fine now, i do
get some 404 for the images in the timeline
(http://localhost:8080/newsite/history_compare_with_current.png) etc,
no showstopper, obviously, but if you can fix that still today i can
give
On 30.01.2009, at 21:56, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
FYI i have completed my two remaining reviews and have additionally
reviewed #243 which was without a review.
I've fixed the problems you saw with #243.
i've updated my local buildout and the the site works fine no
Previously Tom Lazar wrote:
> FYI i have completed my two remaining reviews and have additionally
> reviewed #243 which was without a review.
I've fixed the problems you saw with #243.
Might I request that review comments are emailed to the PLIP author?
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman It i
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 20:47, Tom Lazar wrote:
> there are still outstanding reviews from raphael, witsch and mj (or have
> they perhaps not updated the pliptallies page[1]?) and IMO #243 would also
> warrant a UI review!
Hopefully I'll have some time tomorrow to finish the RR enhancements
revie
FYI i have completed my two remaining reviews and have additionally
reviewed #243 which was without a review.
there are still outstanding reviews from raphael, witsch and mj (or
have they perhaps not updated the pliptallies page[1]?) and IMO #243
would also warrant a UI review!
i have inc
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:49, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
> i think it's time to assign those now, mostly so that nobody gets the
> impression they're already done or almost... ;) with a total of 12 PLIPs we
> get to review six each, so everybody needs to sign up for one more. i just
> did so (for #
hi framework team,
we're quickly approaching the deadline for the first round of
reviews. most PLIPs have already seen at least one review, but in
total we're still at only 11 out of 24 necessary bundle reviews.
we're also still one UI review short. so let's push a little harder
and tr
On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Danny Bloemendaal wrote:
On 19 jan 2009, at 15:28, Tom Lazar wrote:
@danny: could you mark which tickets you will review for UI impact?
perhaps by making an X for those where you will and an explicit - for
those which don't have any.
Yes, I will. I'm already workin
On 19 jan 2009, at 15:28, Tom Lazar wrote:
thanks wichert for your reminder and andi and raphael for your quick
replies.
i've taken this thread as opportunity to summarize the plips and who
(so far) has taken on which review. i've included andi's and raphael's
and added mine.
since danny won'
On 19.01.2009, at 16:36, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
Only 2 plips do not yet have a second reviewer assigned:
#237 "Minor i18n upgrades"
#243 "Replace workflow history viewlet with content history
viewlet"
Shall we tackle these ad hoc or
On Jan 19, 2009, at 3:58 PM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
Only 2 plips do not yet have a second reviewer assigned:
#237"Minor i18n upgrades"
#243 "Replace workflow history viewlet with content history
viewlet"
Shall we tackle these ad hoc or will someone take these?
perhaps let's get goi
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 15:28, Tom Lazar wrote:
> thanks wichert for your reminder and andi and raphael for your quick
> replies.
Indeed, thanks!
> https://dev.plone.org/plone/wiki/PLIPTallies33
Great, Tom! I've added my name for:
#197 "Add FeedParser as external requirement"
#239 "Ada
thanks wichert for your reminder and andi and raphael for your quick
replies.
i've taken this thread as opportunity to summarize the plips and who
(so far) has taken on which review. i've included andi's and raphael's
and added mine.
since danny won't be able to do technical evaluations a
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
[..]
· #126: Link type should automatically redirect when accessed directly
· #234: Standardizing our use of INavigationRoot
· #239: Adapterise the Extensible Indexable Object Wrapper
· #240: Improve locking configurability
· #247: Automate ZCML Loading for
On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Now on to the real work - the reviewing.
How do we distribute that across the team?
now that all PLIPs are submitted, i'd like to follow up on this once
more...
since we didn't talk about i
On Oct 29, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Now on to the real work - the reviewing.
How do we distribute that across the team?
since we didn't talk about it or made any changes, i'd say the same
"rules" still apply: each PLIP should be reviewed in depth by at
least two people. howe
Steve McMahon wrote:
Hi Raphael,
Hi Steve,
sorry for being late and once more a big thanks to you
for taking this on.
Here now my votes
(note to others: they are not (all) on plone.org; even logging
in timed out repeatedly for me - which is one of the reasons
I'm late)
Votes in parentheses ar
On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Tom Lazar wrote:
i've posted the votes and their motivations at the plips, but not on
the list.
thanks tom! and the PLIP pages are fine — they are the canonical
source of information, at least for 3.x with x <= 3.
andi
--
zeidler it consulting - http://zitc.
On Oct 28, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Raphael Ritz wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT
steve,
here's the tally of my remaining plips:
126 +1
228 +1
236 -1
238 +1
239 +1
240 +1
241 +1
242 -1
243 +1
244 -1
247 +1
i've posted the votes and their motivations at the plips, but not on
the list.
cheers,
tom
On 28.10.2008, at 11:21, Tom Lazar wrote:
yes, sorry for holding things
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result?
i'd say
yes, sorry for holding things up. i have seven plips to vote on and
some office furniture to move, but i'm confident i'll get done within
the next few hours while still making informed choices ;-)
cheers,
tom
p.s. @steve: i'll send you a tally of my missing votes, so you should
be able to
On Oct 28, 2008, at 9:21 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These
include some
unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result?
i'd say not yet. i'm aware the
On Oct 28, 2008, at 4:40 AM, Steve McMahon wrote:
Attached is the table with votes in PDF.
thank you.
* The votes on this were qualified based on implementation.
just for the record, i think these can be turned into +1's after
calvin's reply[*]
andi
[*] http://lists.plone.org/piperma
Previously Steve McMahon wrote:
> Here are my 3.3 PLIP tallies as of 5:45 2008-10-28 (UTC). These include some
> unambiguous votes pulled from e-mail messages to the FWT list.
Can this be turned into a result? What I would like to have is a list of
PLIPs, with for each plip the result (accept/rece
26 matches
Mail list logo
