On 21 October 2010 22:55, Chris Calloway c...@unc.edu wrote:
On 10/6/2010 2:17 PM, Jon Stahl wrote:
We already have mass upload, via collective.uploadify.
We seem to have at least some work on mass download, via
http://plone.org/products/zipfiletransport
I'm sure both could use refinement.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2010 22:55, Chris Calloway c...@unc.edu wrote:
On 10/6/2010 2:17 PM, Jon Stahl wrote:
We already have mass upload, via collective.uploadify.
We seem to have at least some work on mass download, via
On 10/6/2010 2:17 PM, Jon Stahl wrote:
We already have mass upload, via collective.uploadify.
We seem to have at least some work on mass download, via
http://plone.org/products/zipfiletransport
I'm sure both could use refinement.
And search/replace-all TTW.
And mass upload/download:import/export of images/files/folders TTW.
We already have mass upload, via collective.uploadify.
If massuploading is supported through the core it should support support
https, which is not true for collective.uploadify in all circumstances.
-Tom
--
My Book
On 9/26/2010 11:42 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Maybe think about killing WebDAV when we have these features: Offline
editing, magical wysiwyg blobby editing controls.
And mass upload/download:import/export of images/files/folders TTW.
And search/replace-all TTW.
--
Sincerely,
Chris Calloway
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Chris Calloway c...@unc.edu wrote:
On 9/26/2010 11:42 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Maybe think about killing WebDAV when we have these features: Offline
editing, magical wysiwyg blobby editing controls.
And mass upload/download:import/export of images/files/folders
I don't think that's a good option. We may not need to support both, but
supporting one is probably quite important. For one thing, it'd kill Enfold
Desktop and similar integrations. WebDAV is also very useful for bulk
movement of images and documents.
Webdav is main mechanism for iPad to
Just a note from the UI side of things here, since you're all doing a good
job with the other bits:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.euwrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Limi wrote:
I think we should envision a future without WebDAV and FTP as core
components of our stack. They never worked well in practice, and are
unlikely to ever reach mainstream usage because of the extra steps,
concept abstraction,
On 6 September 2010 03:01, Sidnei da Silva
sidnei.da.si...@canonical.com wrote:
If I'm allowed to get one suggestion in there:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
snip
WSGI
Various components should be move out of Plone and into the WSGI
pipeline.
On 2010-9-5 17:29, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
PluggableAuthService
--
There's tons of code based on this. I imagine we can first move the
authentication API's into a WSGI middleware querying PAS as the
backend.
This sounds like the mistake repoze.who 1 made. It turns out that for
almost
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 2010-9-5 17:29, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
PluggableAuthService
--
There's tons of code based on this. I imagine we can first move the
authentication API's into a WSGI middleware querying PAS as the
backend.
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:18 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 2010-9-5 17:29, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
PluggableAuthService
--
There's tons of code based on this. I imagine we can first move the
On 5 September 2010 15:29, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
- With Zope 2.13 / Plone 4.1 we are cleaning up the query interface
a bit. The catalog's search methods now all want a simple dictionary
as the query specification and issue deprecation warnings for
everything else.
Can
On 5 September 2010 20:01, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 5 September 2010 19:17, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 September 2010 15:29, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
- Once we have intid's we can change the internal unique id of the
catalog from the
Right, I'm aware of the repoze.who lessons. Authorization is always
going to be a WSGI framework component (endware) and not an isolated
middleware. But there should be some subpart of the API, which allows
you to share the same authorization information across multiple WSGI
applications. Or
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 19:49 +0200, Laurence Rowe wrote:
On 5 September 2010 18:47, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:18 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 2010-9-5 17:29, Hanno
If I'm allowed to get one suggestion in there:
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
snip
WSGI
Various components should be move out of Plone and into the WSGI
pipeline. This should allow us to share code with other projects.
Prime contenders would be:
dev.plone.org tracker is currently unable to create tickets (gives some
xml parsing error), so I'm posting this here:
Registration form spam protection should be improved. Currently Plone
3.x sites (not sure about 4.x) are getting spammed by bots registering
dumm users.
There are two first line
19 matches
Mail list logo
