Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs in Trac

2009-06-20 Thread Jon Stahl
Eric Steele wrote: I have little to add to what Hanno and Martin have stated so well here. To me, what shortcomings the Trac-based approach may have are trivial enough for me to largely overlook and can be covered through some further integration work by the plone.org team and/or better docu

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs in Trac

2009-06-20 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Eric Steele wrote: I already have a calendar started. I'll work on getting that filled out, published, and publicized ASAP. actually, PLIP #246 was meant to introduce the possibility to set up the "plone calendar" using plone.org itself: keeping all relevant d

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs in Trac

2009-06-20 Thread Eric Steele
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hanno Schlichting wrote: ... I wrote a big reply to Matt, and ditched it. +100 to everything you said. :) I'd suggest that: a) We now formally ask PLIP authors to write to the plone-dev list (not this list!) announcing their PLIPs and

Re: [Framework-Team] Re: PLIPs in Trac

2009-06-19 Thread Martijn Pieters
2009/6/19 Ross Patterson : > One of these days I'm gonna have to disagree with Hanno and Martin just > cause I always agree with them, but not today.  +100 also and seriously, > for all the exact reasons detailed. +sys.maxint from me too. Process, not software. -- Martijn Pieters __