Eric Steele wrote:
I have little to add to what Hanno and Martin have stated so well
here. To me, what shortcomings the Trac-based approach may have are
trivial enough for me to largely overlook and can be covered through
some further integration work by the plone.org team and/or better
docu
On Jun 20, 2009, at 5:04 PM, Eric Steele wrote:
I already have a calendar started. I'll work on getting that filled
out, published, and publicized ASAP.
actually, PLIP #246 was meant to introduce the possibility to set up
the "plone calendar" using plone.org itself: keeping all relevant
d
On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
...
I wrote a big reply to Matt, and ditched it. +100 to everything you
said. :)
I'd suggest that:
a) We now formally ask PLIP authors to write to the plone-dev list
(not this list!) announcing their PLIPs and
2009/6/19 Ross Patterson :
> One of these days I'm gonna have to disagree with Hanno and Martin just
> cause I always agree with them, but not today. +100 also and seriously,
> for all the exact reasons detailed.
+sys.maxint from me too. Process, not software.
--
Martijn Pieters
__