Hello,
The colorist said that my material was not excellent, but well within
the normal-to-good range for S8mm. He said I should have worked with
reversal film, because Super-8 cameras were never designed and
calibrated for negative stock and cannot thus yield good results on
negative
Dear Florian,
Your post is very inspiring and helpful, as was Buck Bito's. The guys
at Nova Rolfim, the lab that was recommended to me, had indeed said
that scanning negative would be more difficult and expensive then
reversal film. Maybe they should have been more upfront and state that
they
of digital video) and
experimental filmmakers everywhere.
From: Florian Cramer flrnc...@gmail.com
To: Experimental Film Discussion List frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Sent: Saturday, 25 May 2013, 15:34
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] a question about negative film
Dear Frameworkers,
I have a question about film stock for Super-8mm.
I am back from a scouting trip for a 16mm film project. I did all the
location filming in Super-8mm because I wanted to use the material in
the film as well. I worked with my Leicina Special with a Schneider
Optivaron 6-66mm
Hi Marco,
I've never been happy with Super-8 neg. and the loss of Ekta 100D spells
the end of color Super-8 for me. Even on the most serious Super-8 scanner
I know of in the U.S. at Cinelicious I see what you are complaining about
when it comes to the skies and other areas that should be 'fluid'.
2013 19:38:19 +0200
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: [Frameworks] a question about negative film stock for s-8mm
Dear Frameworkers,
I have a question about film stock for Super-8mm.
I am back from a scouting trip for a 16mm film project. I did all the
location filming
different, something
new.
From: mar.pol...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:38:19 +0200
To: frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com
Subject: [Frameworks] a question about negative film stock for s-8mm
Dear Frameworkers,
I have a question about film stock for Super-8mm.
I am back from
Hi Buck,
Thanks so much about your reply. Sharp and really informative. I will
wait for more replies but already want to react to your email.
I had a look at the footage you linked. Yes, the sky looks terrible
when shot with 200T and 500T, even when scanned at Cinelicious.
Consistent with what I
Thanks Dickie, the footage is very beautiful indeed. I can also
confirm that Fuji Velvia is amazing in 35mm slides.
On 22 May 2013 22:38, Dicky dickyvann...@gmail.com wrote:
The Fuji Velvia looks quite nice as Super 8. If you want to see what it
looks like, watch some of Paul Clipson's films. I
PS Andec FIlm here in Berlin sells Wittner Chrome V50 D (reversible)
cartridges (the Material inside is Fujchrome Velvia 50 Daylight):
http://www.andecfilm.de/en/e_s8_e6-ec64t.htm
As I said I should make a test Kodak Vision 3 50D vs Velvia 50D...
Thanks again Buck!
M
On 22 May 2013 22:35, Buck
Hi Marco,
I just did a quick search and found a very promising test roll of S8
Vision3 50D on Vimeo. It seems to show that the fluidity you're looking
for is possible with this stock:
http://vimeo.com/62358313
-I'd love to see the comparison with Velvia you propose.
--Good luck!
---Buck
Lawrence
On May 22, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Buck Bito - Movette b...@movettefilm.com wrote:
Even on the most serious Super-8 scanner
I know of in the U.S. at Cinelicious I
An old Spirit that only does interlace? Not so much.
Ever hear of Kinetta? :-)
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
