Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Hello Bernie, apologies for my late reply. I took a weekend off, which once in a while happens. Your comments I think are to the point. One of my students reacted in a similar way, stating that what I screened was in a way a curatorial choice. Which in this case was a difficult process because

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Thanks so much for posting this list. It's useful to my current teaching at Evergreen which is focused on integrating animation with marine microbiology and the anthropocene. In fact I just screened a few of Painlevés films day before yesterday. Ruth Hayes http://www.randommotion.com

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Marco, we don't know one another. But the question posed here is appropriate for the list, in my opinion. This is because film is, in my opinion, just an element of a larger project, of which we are a part. For my part, the films will be shown as film. I can say that about work I make. But

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Hi Bernie, Maybe we should have this conversation off list. As I just wrote it's an itemized list that I shared on request of some members of frameworks to comunicate what selection of films my idea brought me to. To answer specifically, yes they were shown digitally (including my work, shot on

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

''la jetée didn't do it to me: it's a narrative about humans against a passive backdrop'' and yet what haunts me after all these years are the objects (the googles, blindfolds etc) and the observation deck itself. 2016-01-28 18:52 GMT-04:00 Marco Poloni : > Hi Bernie, >

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

la jette ? 2016-01-28 16:09 GMT-04:00 Bernard Roddy : > Hi Marco: > > I wasn't watchng when you posted the request, but I have to wonder how > these works were shown, given that everything has been forced into lower > case titles. > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:56 PM,

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

This may be a bit academic, but there are conventions of citation within publishing, as well as a body of thought about "best practices" bearing on digital uses. I was remarking on the fact that all of the titles are written in lower case, and this seems unlikely to be how they were all titled.

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Hey Bernard, I am not sure I get your point about higher and lower case. What I sent you is a copy paste of one of my work documents. The films were organized in groups according to thematic lines and some conceptual affinities amongst them, and properly introduced. On 28 January 2016 at 21:09,

[Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Hello all, I just finished screening a number of films at the University of the Arts of Helsinki, in the context of a workshop for graduate students about filmmaking at the anthropocene. Some of you helped me identify suitable movies, and I am very thankful to you. I had promised, in return, to

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

Hi Marco: I wasn't watchng when you posted the request, but I have to wonder how these works were shown, given that everything has been forced into lower case titles. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Marco Poloni wrote: > Hello all, > I just finished screening a number of

Re: [Frameworks] films for the anthropocene

i was trying to articulate a flat ontology in which human and nonhuman entities somehow have an equivalent agency. la jetée didn't do it to me: it's a narrative about humans against a passive backdrop On 28 January 2016 at 21:33, Francisco Torres wrote: > la jette ? > >