Re: [Frameworks] Kodak Super8 digital camera

yes but what if the new camera flops and no one buys it? Isn't Kodak putting an extra risk on the continuation of stocks?? Bernd > > THIS point about the stocks, above all. > > Tim > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 5:55 PM, Toni-Lynn Frederick >>

[Frameworks] This week in avant garde cinema: Please Confirm Subscription

** Please Confirm Subscription Yes, subscribe me to this list. (https://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/subscribe/confirm?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1aa4289c98=4e65756555) If you received this email by mistake, simply delete it. You won't

[Frameworks] This week [July 15 - 23, 2017] in avant garde cinema

links http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1bf8586399=4e65756555 http://hi-beam.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=e4e99825c1d97f8de6eaffad3=1a20f5b07c=4e65756555 ** This week [July 15 - 23, 2017] in avant garde cinema

Re: [Frameworks] Kodak Super8 digital camera

I think it would be a mistake to make that assumption that if Kodak is selling a Super 8 cameras they will continue to make the film. The management of Kodak is no longer driven driven by the Sensitized Products Division. In my opinion Kodak will discontinue any product when it stops being

[Frameworks] Seeking advice for licensing a 1929 film owned by Warner Brothers

Hi All, I'd appreciate any leads or suggestions on the following, including any referrals to contacts at Warner Brothers distro or licensing. I'm trying to license some clips, for use in a new essay film, from the Hollywood feature Evangeline, released by United Artists in 1929, starring

Re: [Frameworks] Seeking advice for licensing a 1929 film owned by Warner Brothers

Dear Abigail, That's not true --MGM never got it right on this set of titles from UA. In 1936, UA's Art Cinema (Joe Schenck's productions) was dissolved with half of the films being transferred to Mary Pickford. The rights to Evangeline now belong to the Mary Pickford Foundation. (My company,

Re: [Frameworks] Kodak Super8 digital camera

Nicholas wrote that the Kodak was designed by Logmar. I couldn’t find anything about this online, but I assume since Nicholas has one of the Logmars, he’s in touch with the company and knows what he’s talking about. Logmar apparently made 50 units in one batch in 2014 and that was the end of

Re: [Frameworks] Seeking advice for licensing a 1929 film owned by Warner Brothers

Thanks, Dennis, super helpful. *** Abigail Severance 310-508-0352 abigailseverance.com > On Jul 15, 2017, at 2:13 PM, Dennis Doros wrote: > > Dear Abigail, > > That's not true --MGM never got it right on this set of titles from UA. In > 1936, UA's Art Cinema (Joe

Re: [Frameworks] Seeking advice for licensing a 1929 film owned by Warner Brothers

For an “essay film” I’d guess the way you’d incorporate only “some clips” would be textbook Fair Use, and you shouldn’t have to pay anything for rights or obtain permission from anyone. You can check out the American University Center for Media and Social Impact (formerly The Center for Social

Re: [Frameworks] Kodak Super8 digital camera

Dave, For the second time in my life I referenced a Dane as a Norwegian. :) Here is the Logmar's Danish web site, ie http://www.logmar.dk/ On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 10:23 PM Dave Tetzlaff wrote: > Nicholas wrote that the Kodak was designed by Logmar. I couldn’t find >

Re: [Frameworks] Seeking advice for licensing a 1929 film owned by Warner Brothers

I would agree with Dave except for the description of bullet-proof. Yes, it most likely would be fair use and would stand up in court. But to be bulletproof, that would entail hiring a lawyer like Michael Donaldson of Donaldson + Callif (Los Angeles) or J.Stephen Sheppard of Cowan DeBaets