Re: [Frameworks] Canon Camera Problem

[Lady Snowblood]

Hey Ken 

IDK if you’ve found a solution, but I was curious about your issue. I love 
timelapse but the process can be hard on digital camera bodies depending on how 
the machine is built to execute the task. This kind of programming decision was 
added to DSLRs later - a tertiary feature - as users asked for more 
functionality from the camera, pushing them to be more multifunction devices. . 
. As such it is a ‘weaker muscle’ for the device.

Timelapse on Canon 5D cameras are hard on the shutter and mirror mechanisms of 
the cameras - the mirror moves for every shot. This is true no matter how 
you’ve set the focus, unless you chose to turn on the mirror lock feature in 
your camera’s settings menu prior to starting your shoot.

When the mirror sticks and the camera refuses to work with a full battery and 
card etc. it may be a mechanical issue between the mirror & shutter related to 
wear & tear; it could also be related to the circuit board. Apparently 7,000 
images is a threshold mark for physical wear and tear to begin to show up on 
the 5D camera bodies and impact the mirror movement / shutter movement 
mechanisms.

A tinkerer’s approach - fiddling with taking the lens off and reassembling the 
camera, seeing if it will turn on, several times - may encourage the mirror to 
drop back into position. Also if you can get the camera to turn on you can 
check your menu settings for the ‘mirror lock/unlock’ function & toggle that, 
to see if it makes something happen. 

If you have warranty support its definitely something to talk to Canon about. 
They may recommend a technician local to you or let you know you need to ship 
your camera body to them for repair.

Jessica

* * * * *

Jessica Fenlon

artist  : experimental 
instagram  : twitter 
 : flickr 




> On Feb 21, 2016, at 11:25 PM, Ken Paul Rosenthal 
>  wrote:
> 
> I have a Canon 5D Mark lll. Was shooting time-lapse of the moon, one frame 
> every 6 seconds. About 20 minutes into the sequence, the camera suddenly shut 
> down. I thought my CF card had filled up, or the battery had run out. But 
> when the camera wouldn't turn back on after changing the card and battery, I 
> took off the lens and saw that the mirror had locked up. Any ideas as to why 
> this may have happened and how to remedy it?
> 
> Ken
>  www.kenpaulrosenthal.com 
> 
> www.whisperrapture.com 
> www.maddancementalhealthfilmtrilogy.com 
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com 
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks 
> 
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] bounce message ...?

[ev petrol]

ah i'm using yahoo as well, maybe that's it ... thanks gents!

moiratierney.net vimeo.com/moiratierney


On Sat, 2/6/16, Jason Halprin  wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Frameworks] bounce message ...?
 To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" 
 Date: Saturday, February 6, 2016, 9:42 PM
 
 I used to get this a couple times
 per year with my yahoo address.
 -JH
 
 On Saturday, February 6, 2016, Pip Chodorov 
 wrote:
 Your
 membership is not disabled, but sometimes people get this if
 a certain number of mails to their address have bounced.
 
 
 
 
 
 At 21:42 + 6/02/16, ev petrol wrote:
 
 
 hey folks, just got this - any clues as to what it's
 about?
 
 cheers moira
 
 
 
 Your membership in the mailing list FrameWorks has been
 disabled due
 
 to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was
 dated
 
 
 ___
 
 FrameWorks mailing list
 
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 
 
 
 -- 
 Jason HalprinSent via smartphone, please excuse typos
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
 
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Call for Submissions: Edinburgh International Film Festival

[ev petrol]

Hello Kim, how are you?

I had your submission deadline down on my list and somehow let the date slip, 
daft altogether - is there any chance you could still accept a submission?

this is what I was hoping to send in (horrible telecine, but I've a better one 
coming soon): 
American Dreams #5: Cruise Control (2016, 10 mins, 16mm) 
https://vimeo.com/152864920

Hope you don't mind me asking - and if it's too late I fully understand
all the best,
Moira Tierney

moiratierney.net 
vimeo.com/moiratierney


On Tue, 12/22/15, Kim Knowles  wrote:

 Subject: [Frameworks] Call for Submissions: Edinburgh International Film   
Festival
 To: "Experimental Film Discussion List" 
 Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2015, 4:22 AM
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 Call for Submissions:
 70th Edinburgh International Film Festival
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Deadline: February 17, 2016
 
 
 
 Festival dates: June 15 - 26, 2016
 
 
 
 EIFF are inviting experimental submissions for the
 Black Box strand, now in its 14th year. We welcome
 short to medium length work on 16mm, 35mm and digital.
 
 
 
 Black Box is a distinctive section within the festival,
 which presents a diverse spectrum of
 experimental work from around the world. It is committed to
 supporting photochemical film and artisanal practice as well
 as digital.
 
 
 
 All films must be UK premieres and should be no more
 than 12 months old at the time of screening. Full rules and
 regulations can be found here: 
http://www.edfilmfest.org.uk/submissions/rules-regulations.
 
 
 
 As in previous years, I am able to offer fee waivers to
 EIFF alumni and Frameworks subscribers. To take advantage of
 this please contact me privately with an indication of
 whether you would like to submit online or by post.
 
 
 
 Happy holidays to you all!
 
 
 
 Kim Knowles
 Experimental Programmer
 Edinburgh International Film Festival
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CMI
 ===
 
 KEEP IN TOUCH WITH EIFF 
 
 Become a web member for FREE and receive news and offers:
 http://www.edfilmfest.org.uk/register
 
 Follow EIFF at: https://twitter.com/edfilmfest or
 http://www.facebook.com/edfilmfest
 
 
 ===
 
 t. +44(0)131 228 4051
 
 f. +44(0)131 229 5501
 
 w. http://www.edfilmfest.org.uk
 
 88 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9BZ Scotland, United Kingdom
 
 The Edinburgh International Film Festival Limited is a
 subsidiary of the Centre for the Moving Image. Registered in
 Scotland No: SC132453. VAT No: 502 548861. Registered
 Office: 88 Lothian Road, Edinburgh.
 
 
 
 -Inline Attachment Follows-
 
 ___
 FrameWorks mailing list
 FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
 https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Annette Michelson and Peter Gidal

[Francisco Torres]

''He was famously quarrelsome, so an anthology of his correspondence might
be…well, “entertaining”?''


2016-02-22 17:27 GMT-04:00 Chuck Kleinhans :

> Perhaps the editor/publisher wanted a broader range of essays than Gidal
> alone might have preferred.
>
> But hey, he’s still alive, right?  Why not ask him?
>
> He was famously quarrelsome, so an anthology of his correspondence might
> be…well, “entertaining”?
>
>
> Chuck Kleinhans
>
>
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:14 AM, John Muse  wrote:
>
> Thanks, Jonathan.  Right, to his credit, Gidal "curates" in the conflict
> with Snow over "Back and Forth."  Love that.
>
> The Michelson excerpt includes the line that seems to offend him most:
> "Snow has re-defined filmic space as that of action."  Strange that he
> doesn't include the exchange of letters.  Maybe he wanted to but was denied
> rights?
>
> j
>
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Walley  wrote:
>
> Interesting question. Keep in mind that Gidal also included and essay on
> Ken Jacobs’ Tom Tom... (by Lois Mendelson and Bill Simon, also from
> Artforum) that he (Gidal) expressly marked as “symptomatic of current
> misunderstanding” and “fetishization of process and idealization of the
> formal in its weak sense.” Vidal attributed the same “blindness” to the
> film itself. So he was open to polemically including “bad” essays.
>
> He doesn’t include a similar note about the Michelson piece, though he
> only includes an excerpt. Perhaps he found that excerpt less “wrongheaded”
> than other passages in the essay. The entire Snow section of Structural
> Film Anthology is on the polemical side, including the rather pissy letter
> from Snow to Gidal in response to the latter’s comments about Back-Forth.
>
> Sort of an answer?
>
> Dr. Jonathan Walley
> Associate Professor and Chair
> Department of Cinema
> Denison University
> wall...@denison.edu
>
>
> Chuck Kleinhans
>
>
>
>
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>
>
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Annette Michelson and Peter Gidal

[Chuck Kleinhans]

Perhaps the editor/publisher wanted a broader range of essays than Gidal alone 
might have preferred.

But hey, he’s still alive, right?  Why not ask him?

He was famously quarrelsome, so an anthology of his correspondence might 
be…well, “entertaining”?


Chuck Kleinhans


On Feb 22, 2016, at 9:14 AM, John Muse 
> wrote:

Thanks, Jonathan.  Right, to his credit, Gidal "curates" in the conflict with 
Snow over "Back and Forth."  Love that.

The Michelson excerpt includes the line that seems to offend him most: "Snow 
has re-defined filmic space as that of action."  Strange that he doesn't 
include the exchange of letters.  Maybe he wanted to but was denied rights?

j

On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Walley 
> wrote:

Interesting question. Keep in mind that Gidal also included and essay on Ken 
Jacobs’ Tom Tom... (by Lois Mendelson and Bill Simon, also from Artforum) that 
he (Gidal) expressly marked as “symptomatic of current misunderstanding” and 
“fetishization of process and idealization of the formal in its weak sense.” 
Vidal attributed the same “blindness” to the film itself. So he was open to 
polemically including “bad” essays.

He doesn’t include a similar note about the Michelson piece, though he only 
includes an excerpt. Perhaps he found that excerpt less “wrongheaded” than 
other passages in the essay. The entire Snow section of Structural Film 
Anthology is on the polemical side, including the rather pissy letter from Snow 
to Gidal in response to the latter’s comments about Back-Forth.

Sort of an answer?

Dr. Jonathan Walley
Associate Professor and Chair
Department of Cinema
Denison University
wall...@denison.edu


Chuck Kleinhans



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Ganon GL-2 minidv camcorder repair

[Dave Tetzlaff]

I have no experience with either of those shops, but I'll offer some general 
comment on video gear service. Over the years, I had nothing but problems with 
local, independent shops that were listed as service facilities for my 
geographic area by the manufacturer. I resolved to only send repair work out to 
factory facilities operated by the manufacturer, (including Sony, JVC, 
Panasonic and Canon) and they always fixed the stuff right, and in a reasonable 
time frame. Typically, they charge a flat fee, regardless of what's wrong. 
Sometimes that turned out to be a bargain vs. a charge based on actual parts 
and labor time, sometimes not. 

On the other hand, independent shops with a national customer base that 
specialize in the type of gear you have are a different story. I only dealt 
with one of those, for repair of a Japanese Sony DV-SVHS deck that US Sony 
wouldn't take as it wasn't US product. They were good.

Now, most of these repairs, and all the ones that turned into trouble with 
local shops, were for electronics issues. If your camera still works, it sounds 
like you only need the LCD screen mount on the case fixed. Anyone with access 
to the parts, and a guide on how to disassemble the camera should be able to do 
that. 

> -- they quoted $150 repair without seeing the camera.

That sounds reasonable for the problem you described. They'd know what part 
likely broke, what it costs, and how much time it takes to switch it out. For 
$150, there're assuming you won't need a new screen. Most Canons are fragile, 
including the GL2, and they've probably fixed a lot cock-eyed LVCD screens from 
tripod tip-overs and the like.

Unless the quote was 'minimum $150 just to look, and could go higher 
depending...'

As for Jeff's idea of replacing rather than repairing, GL2s are old enough now 
that anything you'd get on eBay would be a bit of a pig-in-a-poke, and if yours 
has been light used, babied and is a known quantity, you probably want to stay 
with it as long as the repair cost isn't too high. If you can get it fixed for 
$150, that's less of a gamble.

If it was me, given that it sounds like we're talking about a broken plastic 
part, I'd probably try to figure out if I could fix it myself using Sugru/epoxy 
or something. But I'm 'handy', and a little crazy...

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Ganon GL-2 minidv camcorder repair

[Jeff Kreines]

You might find eBay a cheaper route — you can use your existing one for 
ingesting tapes into a computer.  There are bargains here:

http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=p2050601.m570.l1311.R1.TR12.TRC2.A0.H0.Xcanon+gl.TRS0&_nkw=canon+gl2&_sacat=0
 


Jeff Kreines
Kinetta

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:33 AM, Robert Withers  wrote:
> 
> My lovely Canon GL-2 fell off(!) a tripod. Something about the quick-release 
> mount. 
> The LCD screen is knocked cock-eyed but the camera otherwise seems to work.
> 
> There are two California repair shops that show up online . . .
> http://www.videoonerepair.com/ in Newbury Park, specializes in only Canon and 
> Sony camcorders
> http://camcorderrepair.com/canon-GL2.htm--in Glendale, all camcorders 
> including Canon, Sony, Panasonic, JVC -- they quoted $150 repair without 
> seeing the camera
> 
> Does anyone have experience with either of these or another?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert
> 
> 212 873-1353 main
> 212 203-3048 mobile
> 
> WithersWorks.com
> 202 West 80th St. #5W
> New York, NY 10024
> 
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Jeff Kreines
Kinetta
j...@kinetta.com
kinetta.com


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

[Frameworks] Ganon GL-2 minidv camcorder repair

[Robert Withers]

My lovely Canon GL-2 fell off(!) a tripod. Something about the quick-release 
mount. 
The LCD screen is knocked cock-eyed but the camera otherwise seems to work.

There are two California repair shops that show up online . . .
http://www.videoonerepair.com/ in Newbury Park, specializes in only Canon and 
Sony camcorders
http://camcorderrepair.com/canon-GL2.htm--in Glendale, all camcorders including 
Canon, Sony, Panasonic, JVC -- they quoted $150 repair without seeing the camera

Does anyone have experience with either of these or another?

Thanks,
Robert

212 873-1353 main
212 203-3048 mobile

WithersWorks.com
202 West 80th St. #5W
New York, NY 10024


___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Annette Michelson and Peter Gidal

[John Muse]

Thanks, Jonathan.  Right, to his credit, Gidal "curates" in the conflict with 
Snow over "Back and Forth."  Love that.

The Michelson excerpt includes the line that seems to offend him most: "Snow 
has re-defined filmic space as that of action."  Strange that he doesn't 
include the exchange of letters.  Maybe he wanted to but was denied rights?

j

On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Walley  wrote:

> Interesting question. Keep in mind that Gidal also included and essay on Ken 
> Jacobs’ Tom Tom... (by Lois Mendelson and Bill Simon, also from Artforum) 
> that he (Gidal) expressly marked as “symptomatic of current misunderstanding” 
> and “fetishization of process and idealization of the formal in its weak 
> sense.” Vidal attributed the same “blindness” to the film itself. So he was 
> open to polemically including “bad” essays.
> 
> He doesn’t include a similar note about the Michelson piece, though he only 
> includes an excerpt. Perhaps he found that excerpt less “wrongheaded” than 
> other passages in the essay. The entire Snow section of Structural Film 
> Anthology is on the polemical side, including the rather pissy letter from 
> Snow to Gidal in response to the latter’s comments about Back-Forth. 
> 
> Sort of an answer?
> 
> Dr. Jonathan Walley
> Associate Professor and Chair
> Department of Cinema
> Denison University
> wall...@denison.edu
> 
> 
>> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:00 AM, John Muse  wrote:
>> 
>> Can someone briefly explain--or point me to resources that explain--how it 
>> is that in 1976 Peter Gidal can include Annette Michelson's June 1971 
>> Artforum piece "Towards Snow" in his Structural Film Anthology when in the 
>> September 1971 issue of Artforum he excoriates her and this piece in 
>> particular, beginning a letter to the editor, 
>> 
>>> In a remarkably wrongheaded piece, Annette Michelson, in the june Artforum 
>>> asserts, with reference to Michael Snow's film, Wavelength, "Snow has 
>>> redefined filmic space as that of action.
>> 
>> "… remarkably wrongheaded…" is certainly polemical, but there she is in the 
>> anthology.  What happened?  Was her response to him persuasive?   
>> 
>> I'll take my answer off the air.  
>> 
>> j/PrM
>> 
>> *
>> 
>> john muse
>> visiting assistant professor of independent college programs
>> haverford college
>> http://www.finleymuse.com
>> http://www.haverford.edu/faculty/jmuse
>> http://haverford.academia.edu/JohnMuse
>> 
>> *
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

j/PrM

*

john muse
visiting assistant professor of independent college programs
haverford college
http://www.finleymuse.com
http://www.haverford.edu/faculty/jmuse
http://haverford.academia.edu/JohnMuse

*



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Annette Michelson and Peter Gidal

[Jonathan Walley]

Interesting question. Keep in mind that Gidal also included and essay on Ken 
Jacobs’ Tom Tom... (by Lois Mendelson and Bill Simon, also from Artforum) that 
he (Gidal) expressly marked as “symptomatic of current misunderstanding” and 
“fetishization of process and idealization of the formal in its weak sense.” 
Vidal attributed the same “blindness” to the film itself. So he was open to 
polemically including “bad” essays.

He doesn’t include a similar note about the Michelson piece, though he only 
includes an excerpt. Perhaps he found that excerpt less “wrongheaded” than 
other passages in the essay. The entire Snow section of Structural Film 
Anthology is on the polemical side, including the rather pissy letter from Snow 
to Gidal in response to the latter’s comments about Back-Forth. 

Sort of an answer?

Dr. Jonathan Walley
Associate Professor and Chair
Department of Cinema
Denison University
wall...@denison.edu


> On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:00 AM, John Muse  wrote:
> 
> Can someone briefly explain--or point me to resources that explain--how it is 
> that in 1976 Peter Gidal can include Annette Michelson's June 1971 Artforum 
> piece "Towards Snow" in his Structural Film Anthology when in the September 
> 1971 issue of Artforum he excoriates her and this piece in particular, 
> beginning a letter to the editor, 
> 
>> In a remarkably wrongheaded piece, Annette Michelson, in the june Artforum 
>> asserts, with reference to Michael Snow's film, Wavelength, "Snow has 
>> redefined filmic space as that of action.
> 
> "… remarkably wrongheaded…" is certainly polemical, but there she is in the 
> anthology.  What happened?  Was her response to him persuasive?   
> 
> I'll take my answer off the air.  
> 
> j/PrM
> 
> *
> 
> john muse
> visiting assistant professor of independent college programs
> haverford college
> http://www.finleymuse.com
> http://www.haverford.edu/faculty/jmuse
> http://haverford.academia.edu/JohnMuse
> 
> *
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

[Frameworks] Annette Michelson and Peter Gidal

[John Muse]

Can someone briefly explain--or point me to resources that explain--how it is 
that in 1976 Peter Gidal can include Annette Michelson's June 1971 Artforum 
piece "Towards Snow" in his Structural Film Anthology when in the September 
1971 issue of Artforum he excoriates her and this piece in particular, 
beginning a letter to the editor, 

> In a remarkably wrongheaded piece, Annette Michelson, in the june Artforum 
> asserts, with reference to Michael Snow's film, Wavelength, "Snow has 
> redefined filmic space as that of action.

"… remarkably wrongheaded…" is certainly polemical, but there she is in the 
anthology.  What happened?  Was her response to him persuasive?   

I'll take my answer off the air.  

j/PrM

*

john muse
visiting assistant professor of independent college programs
haverford college
http://www.finleymuse.com
http://www.haverford.edu/faculty/jmuse
http://haverford.academia.edu/JohnMuse

*



___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Looking for Steenbeck 6000 16/35 timing belts

[Scott Dorsey]

Those belts are made by Brecoflex.  US reps can be found at
http://www.brecoflex.com 
--scott
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Index of experimental film and/or video art collections and archives

[Angélica Cuevas Portilla]

 

Hello! 

You can also check the website of COLLECTIF JEUNE CINEMA french
distributor and organizer of the only french film festival totally
devoted to experimental and different moivng images: Festival des
cinémas différents de Paris! 

http://www.cjcinema.org/ [7] 

I can also help you with Mexican and Latino America experimental (films,
videos, perfs, people and archives) 

http://moreliafilmfest.com/en/un-acercamiento-al-cine-mexicano-experimental/
[8] 

Greetings, 

Angélica 

---

Angélica Cuevas Portilla
MEX-PARISMENTAL
85 boulevard Brune
75014 Paris
France
+33-6-64 24 09 10
@MexParismental [4]
https://www.facebook.com/MexParismental [5]
http://mex-parismental.blogspot.com [6]
***
-18TH FESTIVAL DES CINÉMAS DIFFÉRENTS DE PARIS
 http://www.cjcinema.org
 Octobre 2016

"Everybody wants to get enlightened but nobody wants to change." A.
Cohen

On 2016-02-22 13:41, Albert Alcoz wrote: 

> There's the media & video art distribution from Spain named HAMACA, for 
> example... 
> http://www.hamacaonline.net/default.php [2]
> 
> El Domingo 21 de febrero de 2016 11:16, Anna Briggs  
> escribió:
> 
> Hello, 
> 
> I am a moving image archivist specialised in film literacy, archival outreach 
> and programming, amateur and documentary film curation. I am currently a 
> lecturer in cataloguing and documentary film analysis, as well as a Ph.D. 
> candidate at the Université François-Rabelais de Tours (France): the subject 
> of my thesis is non-fiction moving images as archival and curatorial objects. 
> I am writing to ask where I might possibly find an index of experimental film 
> and/or video art collections and archives. I am particularly looking for 
> archives in non-Western countries, to investigate as part of a thesis chapter 
> about the experimental paradigm. I have consulted lists of films archives 
> compiled by the International Federation of Film Archives, the Association of 
> Moving Image Archivists and the Library of Congress, but I wonder if there is 
> a more specialised database. 
> 
> Thank you, 
> 
> Anna Briggs 
> http://intru.hypotheses.org/les-chercheurs-2/doctorants/anna-briggs [3] 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks [1]
> 
> ___
> FrameWorks mailing list
> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks [1]
 

Links:
--
[1] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
[2] http://www.hamacaonline.net/default.php
[3] http://intru.hypotheses.org/les-chercheurs-2/doctorants/anna-briggs
[4] https://twitter.com/MexParismental
[5] https://www.facebook.com/MexParismental
[6] http://mex-parismental.blogspot.com
[7] http://www.cjcinema.org/
[8]
http://moreliafilmfest.com/en/un-acercamiento-al-cine-mexicano-experimental/___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Re: [Frameworks] Index of experimental film and/or video art collections and archives

[Albert Alcoz]

There's the media & video art distribution from Spain named HAMACA, for 
example...http://www.hamacaonline.net/default.php

 

El Domingo 21 de febrero de 2016 11:16, Anna Briggs 
 escribió:
 

 Hello,

Iam a moving image archivist specialised in film literacy, archivaloutreach and 
programming, amateur and documentary film curation. I amcurrently a lecturer in 
cataloguing and documentary film analysis, aswell as a Ph.D. candidate at the 
Université François-Rabelais deTours (France): the subject of my thesis is 
non-fiction moving imagesas archival and curatorial objects. I am writing to 
ask where I mightpossibly find anindex of experimental film and/or video art 
collections and archives.Iam particularly looking for archives in non-Western 
countries, toinvestigate as part of a thesis chapter about the 
experimentalparadigm. I have consulted lists of films archives compiled by 
theInternational Federation of Film Archives, the Association of MovingImage 
Archivists and the Library of Congress, but I wonder if thereis a more 
specialised database. 

Thankyou,

AnnaBriggshttp://intru.hypotheses.org/les-chercheurs-2/doctorants/anna-briggs
___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks


  ___
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks