Re: does bsdmall really sells freebsd cd ?

2006-01-16 Thread Frank J. Laszlo

Matt Olander wrote:


On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0100, Gilbert Fernandes wrote:
 


ordered monthes ago the freebsd 6 cds from bsdmall, the
november 5th 2005.

since this date, the freebsd 6 cds have been available, for
example at the bsdcon.

we are past half january and i have never seen anything
coming from bsd mall.

so my first question is : how serious are those bsdmall people ?

they take orders, dont send anything monthes after product
is available and when sending them emails, they dont answer.

my second question is : has anyone ordered and received
freebsd 6 cds from them ?
   



I've had a similar experience with their magazine. We order all our
FreeBSD CD's through freebsdmall.com and I've never had a problem.

FreeBSD Mall is formerly the Walnut Creek CD-ROM operation.

-matt


 

For the record, a buddy of mine had simular issues. Also note that 
bsdmall.com and freebsdmall.com are 2 completely separate entities.



Regards,
   Frank
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i386 do not support i386

2005-11-24 Thread Frank J. Laszlo

Christer Hermansson wrote:


Christer Hermansson wrote:


Hi.

FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release 
notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the 
x86 platform.


Not very important issue for me but it feels little strange to have a 
i386 platform that don't support/work on i386 processors.


http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
"Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration 
option) has been removed. Users running this class of CPU should use 
FreeBSD 5./X/ or earlier."



Christer Hermansson

It's a lot of names around us, not only in the computer world, that 
has become less suitable during the time because of progress and other 
things, but still is in use because of different factors.


I missed to write in my first mail that I also have the feeling (maybe 
I'm wrong) that "x86" is more recognized / common in the media nowadays.


However in this case maybe it's best to keep "i386" because a lot of 
things depends on this name and it would be a lot of work/problems to 
change it.


This was just one thought I had but it seems to be a bad one.

Best regards Christer Hermansson

I totally agree with you, x86 is a much more recognized representation. 
I'd just hate to be the one having to do all the code modifications to 
"Make it Work(tm)"


find /usr/src /usr/ports -type f | xargs sed -i '.bak' "s/i386/x86/g"

Only in a perfect "world" right? :)

Regards,
   Frank
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i386 do not support i386

2005-11-24 Thread Frank J. Laszlo

Astrodog wrote:


On 11/23/05, Frank J. Laszlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 


Christer Hermansson wrote:

   


Hi.

FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release
notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the
x86 platform.


 


Do you realize how many things depend on the platform name being i386?
Just thinking of ports alone, I cound probably name a "few." Not very
important, but a huge hastle to switch over.

-Frank

   





Mmm. Thanksgiving Day Bikesheds, thy name is "Chris".
___
 

Not sure if that was directed at me, I wasnt trying to be a dick about 
it, and I tried not to come across like that.


Everyone have a safe and happy holiday season, save some pie for me!

Regards,
   Frank
___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: i386 do not support i386

2005-11-23 Thread Frank J. Laszlo

Christer Hermansson wrote:


Hi.

FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release 
notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the 
x86 platform.



Do you realize how many things depend on the platform name being i386? 
Just thinking of ports alone, I cound probably name a "few." Not very 
important, but a huge hastle to switch over.


-Frank

___
freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"