Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Doug Barton
Peter Wemm wrote: I hope we haven't changed the server default to stop forwarding.. the security risk is to the client, not the remote sshd server, therefore it is the client that should decide on whether to forward or not. I seem to recall the server default being changed, then

Re: HEADS UP: Alpha OpenSSH/OpenSSL breakage

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: I've tracked down what seems to be a bug in the new version of OpenSSL I imported a week ago which affects the alpha platform. It *looks* like a bug in OpenSSL's "bignum" library which might not have shown up for users of the default openssl

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes" Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Mike Pritchard
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote: Kris Kennaway writes: $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs. announced 1024. Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh. Warning:

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:25:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes" Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work. Bzzzt. Man sshd(8): X11Forwarding Specifies whether X11

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Bzzzt. Man sshd(8): Ah, I'm confused and came in on the middle of a conversation. Never mind. : That's what I found out as a result of this conversation. That's good to know! Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes" Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work. According to the documentation, ForwardX11 yes is for ssh configs and X11Forwarding yes is for

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Andrew Reilly wrote: What man ssh(1) doesn't tell you in this paragraph is that even if you say "ForwardX11 yes" in ~/.ssh/config, you will not get a proxy X session unless the server has "X11Forwarding yes" in /etc/ssh/sshd_config. The default that my system

make release broken...

2000-04-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
=== bin/csh/nls cd /usr/src/bin/csh/nls ; make afterdistribute DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/bin === bin/csh/nls/finnish make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/bin/csh/nls. *** Error code 1 -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL

Re: make release broken...

2000-04-21 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:54:23PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: === bin/csh/nls cd /usr/src/bin/csh/nls ; make afterdistribute DESTDIR=/R/stage/trees/bin === bin/csh/nls/finnish make: don't know how to make distribute. Stop Fix commited. -- Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Ben Smithurst
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote: It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too. -Chris Okay, give me some more info, please: You're going from the 5.0 box to the 4.0 box. What's the /etc/hosts look like on the 5.0 box?

Re: make world left me with an unbootable system

2000-04-21 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Nickolay Dudorov wrote: Me too There is some problems with "/boot/loader". You can just hit the key due to "|/-..." propelling and load "/boot/loader.old" instead of "/boot/loader". (And the first thing I make on the booted system - "cp /boot/loader.old /boot/loader.good" ;-) Ah,

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Ben Smithurst wrote: X11 forwarding is working for me now, but wasn't when I first tried it. I found I was explicitly setting XAUTHORITY=~/.Xauthority in my .zshrc file, so the temporary bits created in /tmp/ssh-foo/cookies by ssh weren't being picked up. I missed the

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Archie Cobbs
Mike Pritchard writes: Kris Kennaway writes: $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs. announced 1024. Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh. Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Julian Elischer
Archie Cobbs wrote: I presume the public key at freefall matches the public key at machine-B. Try connecting back in the other direction so that the 'known machines' settings are tested. This only happens when going from machine A - machine B - freefall. Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is

Re: ssh to freefall brokenb

2000-04-21 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer writes: I presume the public key at freefall matches the public key at machine-B. Try connecting back in the other direction so that the 'known machines' settings are tested. Can't do that because of the firewall.. This only happens when going from machine A - machine B -

Re: ssh to freefall brokenb

2000-04-21 Thread Julian Elischer
Archie Cobbs wrote: What happens if you use TELNET to get to machine B? does the ssh to freefall still misbehave? (in other words.. what if machine A is not involved?) Aha.. that works! (note: home directory is the same on A or B) Looks like some of the environment that the 1st

Re: MAKEDEV warning

2000-04-21 Thread Scott Flatman
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Dirk Roehrdanz wrote: [ snippage ] I get this message too whenever I mount a mfs filesystem. The line in /etc/fstab is: /dev/da0s1b /tmp mfs rw,async,-s327680 0 The output of "ls -l /dev/*da0s1b" is: crw-r- 1 root operator 13,

make release still broken...

2000-04-21 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
=== bin/csh install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 csh /syv/release/bin /syv/release/bin/tcsh - /syv/release/bin/csh === bin/csh/nls === bin/csh/nls/finnish install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 tcsh.cat /syv/release/../usr/share/nls/fi_FI.ISO_8859-1/tcsh.cat install:

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: This only happens when going from machine A - machine B - freefall. Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current (as of a couple of days ago). Hmm. It works for me going 5.0-C - 5.0-C - freefall using openssh both times. Perhaps

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: Sorry, no dice :( It doesn't seem to be that. All I've got left is maybe sending out every bit of configuration info, and maybe someone could figure it out. I doubt it, though, so I'm not gonna. Silly question, but have you tried

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current (as of a couple of days ago). Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 - openssh-1.2.3 - freefall, and it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2.26..let me know what happens after

Re: ssh to freefall broken

2000-04-21 Thread Archie Cobbs
Kris Kennaway writes: On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote: Machine A is 3.4-REL, machine B is either 4.0-stable or 5.0-current (as of a couple of days ago). Hmm, I've just tried it with ssh-1.2.27 - openssh-1.2.3 - freefall, and it still works. Maybe it's something about 1.2.26..let

OpenSSL asm optimizations

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
OpenSSL includes asm code for several platforms to speed up various operations. Currently we don't build any of this - the attached patch turns on asm code for Pentiums and above (it relies on an uncommitted patch to sys.mk which defined MACHINE_CPU ?= i386). Set MACHINE_CPU to "i586" or "i686"

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Chuck Robey
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes: : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes" Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work. While this whole thing is being discussed, does anyone know of either a configuration variable

Re: OpenSSL asm optimizations

2000-04-21 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
Can these be turned on at runtime? My concern is that build systems that compile for other machines not generate code dependent on the machine thats building the code. On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: OpenSSL includes asm code for several platforms to speed up various operations.

Re: OpenSSL asm optimizations

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: Can these be turned on at runtime? My concern is that build systems that compile for other machines not generate code dependent on the machine thats building the code. I probably meant TARGET_CPU, but that's easily taken care of. Kris In

Re: Anyone have OpenSSH + X11-fwd working?

2000-04-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Chuck Robey wrote: While this whole thing is being discussed, does anyone know of either a configuration variable or environmental variable that ssh reads, that will give the same effect as the -q flag, so that I can stop seeing those stupid warnings about the size of

missing functionality

2000-04-21 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
This thread began on -STABLE; I am moving it to -CURRENT and have crossposted. Please, followups to -CURRENT. On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, Jonathan Michaels wrote: actually see bad blocks your disk is about to die. IIRC, the code was suffering from bitrot and the drives that really needed it will