On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
code.
Kris
PGP signature
dear
I had been upgrade my system from BSD4.3-RELEASE to BSD5.0-CURRENT
but I found fatal question that is my 3c905B AHA2940 maybe use the
same irq(14).As this my 3c905B do nothing. How can i do?
Can't thankful enougth to you!
Also I found I could not use su .
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:07:38 +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
soon.
:-) :-) :-)
Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a
sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be
Have we come to a decision on when we're going to either drop floppy
support or consider a different version of GENERIC for the CDROM
installation?
Along the lines of droping floppy support: I just managed to setup
a DHCP/TFTP/NFS diskless boot server that boots the floppy install
images.
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
soon.
The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1,
it can be linked to openssl but it
According to Maxim Sobolev:
libmd I meant.
That's a possibility but it already has its own md5/des code. It is just
that authentication through openssl is available and many 5.x / 4.x have it
by default...
It is required by sshd and friends but crypto is still optional.
--
Ollivier ROBERT
This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
has hooks into all the networking code, does this
become an issue on slow or
Are there any reasons not to use -u bind flag for named by default?
# Or importing code to use chroot from OpenBSD?
--
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] // IMG SRC, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // FreeBSD Project
bind.diff
English
Español
Escape
to Paradise...!
El
Rancho Villas
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 10:42:29 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
If the error keeps turning up, I would guess that you have a 0 or
empty fsck field in /etc/fstab and fsck -s therefore not fixing the
problem.
Nope. I have passno set for the filesystem on which I also see this. I
used to
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:25:56AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Is there any chance to enable IPSEC in GENERIC?
I'm not sure how much that would bloat the kernel..there may not be
space for it on the install floppy.
I might misunderstand how the
According to Garrett Wollman:
I'd like to have the AUTOKEY functionality available if at all
possible.
Goodnews: the first run I've done of configure with --with-crypto=autokey
give me no dependencies on openssl (which is necessary for public key
stuff).
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol
Am I desynched? I went to single-user, tried to do a fsck -s, and found there is no
such option.
Also, the /etc/fstab didn't need changed at all. It is already proper.
Needless to say, going to single-user, running just `fsck -y /dev/ad0s1g` fixed the
problem, although it noted no errors.
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
soon.
The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1,
it
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Probably the recent change (IIRC) that someone turned running an
executable into a mtime change.
Which change is that?
/assar
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
soon.
:-) :-) :-)
The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1,
it can be linked to openssl but it is still
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:40:24 CST, Brad Huntting wrote:
Have we come to a decision on when we're going to either drop floppy
support or consider a different version of GENERIC for the CDROM
installation?
Along the lines of droping floppy support: I just managed to setup
a
-CURRENT (Jul 25), alpha.
An increasing number of executables on that box are sporting ever
newer mtimes. This appears to have been going on ever since the
Jul 25 update. There is no clear pattern which executables are
touched. md5 comparisons with previous backup levels (using a Jul 13
copy
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:14:51AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 21:44:27 CST, Warner Losh wrote:
I'd love to do that, but it would have to be removed for the install
disks. The kernel already is too fat for them :-(
Have we come to a decision on when we're going
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 11:54:00AM -0600, Brad Huntting wrote:
Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] responds:
I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
code.
What about
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hajimu UMEMOTO writes:
: On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 02:57:55 -0700
: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:
: kris On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
:
: kris I doubt
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:52:19 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a
sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be doing
HTML - mdoc transcription.
Don't hold your breath then, he repeated two days ago he
On 02-Aug-01 Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:33:41 MST, John Baldwin wrote:
I get these messages when I reboot or crash before the background
fsck finishes sometimes. Sometimes I get them when the filesystems
are clean, too. They always happen when the previous
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 11:21:21 EST, Jim Bryant wrote:
Could there be a bug in softupdates again?
In fsck, more likely. This is why background fsck is enabled by
default, I guess -- to get the bugs shaken out. :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
use one of the client/server authentication methods and write the
server part in a way that it keeps it in memory
(of course the user database is usually in cache if you are doing a lot of
authentication)
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, :: Patrick Tracanelli :: wrote:
Hello you all;
I want to know
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 12:25:13 +0200, Ollivier Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1,
it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component.
Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] responds:
I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
code.
What about makeing the individual encription and authentication
schemes loadable modules?
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 02:57:55 -0700
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
kris On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 04:55:53PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone attempted to make a loadable module out of IPSEC yet?
kris I doubt it would be possible: it has hooks all through the network
kris
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:28:09AM -0700, Glen Gross wrote:
This gives me the opportunity to ask a question I have been wondering for a
while... I've been building kernels with IPSEC support
and was unclear what kind of load this puts on the system by default. If IPSEC
has hooks into all
Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:50:24 -0700,
Dima Dorfman wrote:
IIRC the last time this came up somebody said something about it not
being able to read zonefiles in some odd places where they like to put
them. I.e., they want it to run as root so they can
Ïðåäëàãàåì ïðèîáðåñòè â ñîáñòâåííîñòü àäìèíèñòðàòèâíîå çäàíèå â Êàçàíè
(Òàòàðñòàí, Ðîññèÿ):
- Îáùàÿ ïëîùàäü 910 êâ. ì;
- 2 ýòàæà;
- Áîëüøîå êîëè÷åñòâî ïîìåùåíèé îò 7 äî 200 êâ.ì;
- Ñîáñòâåííàÿ òåððèòîðèÿ - çåìåëüíûé ó÷àñòîê 0,101 Ãà.
Çäàíèå - áûâøàÿ ñòîëîâàÿ ðå÷íîãî ïîðòà. Èìååò âûãîäíîå
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
I found that the rpc.umntall program from time to time starts dumping a core
at each startup/shutdown. Removal of /var/db/mountab helps for certain
period of time, but eventually the problem reoccurs. Attached please find
backtrace of two cores (sig11
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Maxim Sobolev writes:
I found that the rpc.umntall program from time to time starts dumping a core
at each startup/shutdown. Removal of /var/db/mountab helps for certain
It seems to be a bug in the rpc library (thank $deity for libefence
when tracking down such bugs
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Title: Untitled Document
Investors
and Collectors of Militaria
Endorsed
and signed by the Australian Chief of Army
Lieutenant
General Peter Cosgrove
For
information and to order
Opportunities
I forgot: Even if I define CLK_USE_*_CALIBRATION (and get no error messages
after defining debug.acpi.timer_test), the Off/2 error still persist.
Ok. I'm going to revert to the safe read code in a few minutes.
Can you update and let me know if you're still wildly off? I'm having a
hard
I've made a couple of minor changes to the ACPI code:
- Fixed (hopefully) PCI interrupt routing, thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
who was able to actually test (and correct) my code.
- Changed the way ACPI timers are treated to be more pessimistic. It
looks like we can't assume that the
This should fix problems people were having with PCI interrupt routing and
ACPI. Please report any problems...
msmith 2001/08/03 01:38:49 PDT
Modified files:
sys/dev/acpica acpi_pcib.c
Log:
Shoud build resources in the _CRS buffer. Oops.
Submitted by:
wosch What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot make a
wosch snapshot anymore?
current.jp.FreeBSD.org is for you until current.freebsd.org is back
again; it's not a *mirror*, but has almost same features.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, David Greenman wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 06:28:59PM +, Christian Weisgerber ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Probably the recent change (IIRC) that someone turned running an
executable into a mtime change.
There was no such change. I proposed a change that would
Hi,
the last -current snapshot is 6 weeks old.
ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/5.0-20010618-CURRENT/,
What happens? Is -current now so unstable that we cannot
make a snapshot anymore?
-Wolfram
--
Wolfram Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wolfram.schneider.org
To
No, the machine is dead and we haven't managed to get a replacement
going yet. Hopefully in late August, as soon as everyone involved is
back from vacation.
- Jordan
From: Wolfram Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: no new snapshot on ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 08:53:56AM -0700, Manfred Antar wrote:
libpam will not build if you don't have the stock ssh installed.
I use ssh from ports.
(libpam)502}make
=== modules
=== modules/pam_deny
=== modules/pam_ftp
=== modules/pam_nologin
=== modules/pam_opie
===
sorry to bug this list with this question. I'd like to test the newer
ray(4) driver that's in -CURRENT. What snapshot should I install? Is
there anything else I should know before installing -CURRENT? (besides
what the cutting edge section of the handbook says)
Regards,
Paul
[EMAIL
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 19:50:24 -0700
From: Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are there any reasons not to use -u bind flag for named by default?
IIRC the last time this came up somebody said something about it not
being able to read zonefiles in some odd places where they like to put
them.
45 matches
Mail list logo
