Re: options NO_KLD

2001-10-09 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Holtor wrote: Will this NO_KLD option be commited to -current and then hopefully -stable? I have been checking the LINT file each morning after the nightly cvsup runs hoping to find this option in there but so far havent seen it in sight. Any

Re: kldxref broken, maybe?

2001-10-09 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:19:22PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: Warner Losh wrote: In message p05100307b7cfef6da22f@[207.76.207.129] Mark Peek writes: : Install a -current kernel on a 4.X or pre-kldxref (before 9/10/01) : 5.X system. I

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-09 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
None of those things are realproblems. I've set up the port to be hosted on MASTER_SITE_LOCAL for now, but Lyndon's free to go and host it wherever he likes, organise whatever community support he likes (if theres nontrivial interest he could surely even get a freebsd.org mailing list set

Re: Why do soft interrupt coelescing?

2001-10-09 Thread Terry Lambert
Kenneth D. Merry wrote: [ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ] As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the ti(4) driver. IMO, you should be able to tweak the coalescing parameters on the

Re: Why do soft interrupt coelescing?

2001-10-09 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:28:02 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Kenneth D. Merry wrote: [ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ] As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the ti(4) driver.