Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm writes: > >> No, it isn't the regression tests. It is this here in the start of stage 4: > >> > >> ===> usr.bin/vi > >> *** Error code 1 (ignored) > >> *** Error code 1 (ignored) > >> ===> usr.bin/vis > >> >

VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR?

2003-01-04 Thread walt
After updating world and kernel this evening I saw this message fly by during the reboot: Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s3a VOP_STRATEGY on VCHR : 0xc25fd000: tag none, type VCHR, usecount 5, writecount 0, refcount 6, flags (VV_OBJBUF), Sorry, need DDB option to print backtrace That feels like

Re: troubles with realplay-er

2003-01-04 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Julian Elischer wrote: me too A 5.0-RELEASE showstopper? -mi On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote: This Linux program used to work well, but now it crashes (with SIGABRT) some URLs, such as pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~iii-600111/0255135_0101_00_0002.ra pnm://rm.content.loudeye

Re: troubles with realplay-er

2003-01-04 Thread Julian Elischer
me too On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > This Linux program used to work well, but now it crashes (with SIGABRT) > some URLs, such as > > pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~iii-600111/0255135_0101_00_0002.ra > pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~a-600111/0631342_0103_00_0002.ra >

Q) Does perl install libperl.so ?

2003-01-04 Thread Yamada Ken Takeshi
/usr/ports/lang/perl5 seemingly does not generate libperl.so with FreeBSD-current port as shown below. Is it intended one? Why? : : : Any special flags to pass to cc -c to compile shared library modules? [-DPIC -fPIC] What command should be used to create dynamic libraries? [c

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-04 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
Craig Rodrigues said on Jan 4, 2003 at 22:41:50: > > You truncated too much stuff, can you repost the whole dmesg output, > not just the parts you think are relevant. OK, here it is at the bottom. > Also, what do you get when you do the following: > > file - < /dev/ad0s1a standard input:

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's ugly, but try adding: > > 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1 localhost > localhost.localdomain That actually "fixed" it, but maybe for the wrong reason. I restarted my sendmail daemons for no good reason after changin

Re: Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-04 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
> However, I can no longer mount my linux partition: when I try, I get > # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s2 /mnt > ext2fs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or directory Here's the ata/geom related parts of the dmesg output: - Rahul atapci0: port 0x1420-0x142f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altioba

Unable to mount ext2fs partition

2003-01-04 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
I decided to bump my laptop up to 5.0-CURRENT today. All seems to have gone well and all my old binaries work fine, it looks very nice. However, I can no longer mount my linux partition: when I try, I get # mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s2 /mnt ext2fs: /dev/ad0s2: No such file or directory Did somethi

Rather verbose ACPI errors.

2003-01-04 Thread David O'Brien
Ever since the last ACPI import, I get all this output (non-verbose) boot. What's the change on them going away soon? acpi0: on motherboard ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE15 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [Z00Q] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI-1287: *** Error

troubles with realplay-er

2003-01-04 Thread Mikhail Teterin
This Linux program used to work well, but now it crashes (with SIGABRT) some URLs, such as pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~iii-600111/0255135_0101_00_0002.ra pnm://rm.content.loudeye.com/~a-600111/0631342_0103_00_0002.ra or hangs... The crashes are persistent -- the same URL will a

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: [...] > From my personal experience, DSL and cable modems are also transient > connections. 8-(. I've had real good service from both (in a hardware sense -- but at every "change of state" (initiated by me), their people wo

alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

5.0-CURRENT + Xfree86(radeon) blackout/hang

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
I previously reported the same symptoms which occurred (repeatably) a few minutes after booting and starting X after a fresh -RC2 install from ISO. The problem seemed to have gone away after rebuilding the OS after cvsuping -CURRENT on 30'dec. But... I just got it again (once) after being "up" s

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-04 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Juli Mallett wrote: > * De: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-04 ] > [ Subjecte: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex ] > > > > Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my > > -current notebook with userla

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > swear> BTW, I was suprised to find several help files only under /usr/src > swear> and the Sendmail Installation and Operation only under that and not > swear> yet built from the source "op.me". (PR worthy?) > > op.me is built and installed in /

Re: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-04 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-01-04 ] [ Subjecte: pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex ] > > Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my > -current notebook with userland/kernel dated Dec 29: Incidentally, this doesn'

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 12:47:29 -0800 > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: tlambert2> The FreeBSD library bug is that the /etc/hosts file entry: tlambert2> ::1 tlambert2> is not canonized before being compared, for the reverse lookup. No, it does. I've tested it with foll

Re: systat -ifstat patch

2003-01-04 Thread phk
Committed, thanks! Poul-Henning -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

pthread ^T problem on recent -CURRENT: death in libc_r mutex

2003-01-04 Thread Robert Watson
Juli Mallett pointed me at the following reproduceable problem on my -current notebook with userland/kernel dated Dec 29: paprika:~/freebsd/test/pthread> ./test 1 2 1 2 1 2 load: 0.02 cmd: test 910 [running] 0.00u 0.01s 0% 824k 1 Bus error (core dumped) paprika:~/freebsd/test/pthread> ./test 1 2

Re: systat -ifstat patch

2003-01-04 Thread Trent Nelson
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 09:50:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This looks pretty useful. Thanks! I think so, so have most other people I've spoken to. > As far as I can see you have some genuine fixes in there: > > >--- /shared/data/trent/src/src/usr.bin/systat/cmds.c Wed Dec 12 00:1

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Terry Lambert
"Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > > You're kludge breaks as soon as the submitting machine is not the > > server machine (i.e. you start making MSP connections over your > > local network). > > My ISP charges more for an Internet-connected LAN and I have no need for > one, so I don't bother. This bri

Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2003-01-04 Thread Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hiroki Sato writes: > > I also had "kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 275378176 total allocated" > > several times on -current as of Jan 4th. My -current box has 3GB memory, > > but when the memory size is explicitly specified as 2GB

Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2003-01-04 Thread Terry Lambert
Hiroki Sato wrote: > I also had "kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 275378176 total allocated" > several times on -current as of Jan 4th. My -current box has 3GB memory, > but when the memory size is explicitly specified as 2GB via MAXMEM option, > the panic disappears (but I don't know wh

Re: systat -ifstat patch

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Trent Nelson writes: > >I've written an extension to systat that allows you to monitor the >traffic through active network interfaces on the system, akin to >netstat -I. I've attached the patch to this e-mail, but it can also be >found at http://arpa

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Terry Lambert
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > The latest FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE /etc/namedb/named.conf contains: > > // RFC 3152 > zone "1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.IP6.ARPA" { > type master; > file "localhost-v6.rev"; > }; > > // RFC 1886 -- deprecated > zone "1.0

Re: VM page queue mutex not locked panic (WAS:Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small... )

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <051f01c2b42e$e4651400$471b3dd4@dual>, "Willem Jan Withagen" writes: >But the following question is alrady there. >When I woke up this morning I found my box with a double panic: >lock (sleep mutex) VM page queue mutex not locked @ >/usr/src/sys/kern/vf >[the remainder was not o

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm writes: >Peter Wemm wrote: >> Kris Kennaway wrote: >> > >> > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> > Content-Disposition: inline >> > >> > Can someone please fix whereintheworld to grok the new make regression >> > test ou

VM page queue mutex not locked panic (WAS:Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small... )

2003-01-04 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
> In message <03a701c2b38c$8e3ad990$471b3dd4@dual>, "Willem Jan Withagen" writes: > >Which seems a problem sticking up it's head once so often. > >I had it happen to me now 3 times over the last day. It just drops into the >debugger. > >And I've foun little extra info in the archive. > > > >W

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Content-Disposition: inline > > > > Can someone please fix whereintheworld to grok the new make regression > > test output, so it doesn't get confused and dump the entire world >

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Peter Wemm
Kris Kennaway wrote: > > --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > > Can someone please fix whereintheworld to grok the new make regression > test output, so it doesn't get confused and dump the entire world > output in the emails? No, it isn

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gary W. Swearingen
[Dang; I meant to move this thread to -questions only, not -current.] Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ There is a genuine FreeBSD bug or two at the root of your problem ] > > "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > > > BTW, I was suprised to find several help files only > > under /usr/src a

Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hiroki Sato writes: > I also had "kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 275378176 total allocated" > several times on -current as of Jan 4th. My -current box has 3GB memory, > but when the memory size is explicitly specified as 2GB via MAXMEM option, > the panic d

Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2003-01-04 Thread Hiroki Sato
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: phk> In message <03a701c2b38c$8e3ad990$471b3dd4@dual>, "Willem Jan Withagen" writes: phk> >Which seems a problem sticking up it's head once so often. phk> >I had it happen to me now 3 times over the last day. It just drops into the debugger.

Re: current/stable remote gdb interoperability

2003-01-04 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 09:13:44AM -0600, ryan beasley wrote: > instance of gdb was compiled from source w/ the patches found in the > devel/gdb52 port. (I don't have room for the ports tree locally.) pkg_add -r gdb52 (or try the gdb53 port also) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

bzip2recover isn't compiled/installed during build/install world (STABLE & CURRENT)

2003-01-04 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello to all, I noted that bzip2recover isn't installed during build/installworld. I think it may be something related with it makefile. This happens on both STABLE and CURRENT brach. I someone could correct this, I apreciate that. Thanks very much,

Re: Compilation failure on x86

2003-01-04 Thread David Holm
On Saturday 04 January 2003 15:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Holm writes: > > It seems like your #includes are not in sync with your userland, > did you use "make buildworld" or did you simple "make all" in /usr/src ? I got up too early it seems. Ran make ins

panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) Giant @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:206

2003-01-04 Thread ryan beasley
This machine panic-ed while relatively idle. It was primarily juggling only a few screen sessions with instances of vim. After grabbing what could be useful in response to the first panic, I requested a panic to get a coredump. The kernel disagreed, panic-ed for another reaso

lock order reversal

2003-01-04 Thread leafy
lock order reversal Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 1st 0xc26b05c0 process lock (process lock) @ /usr\ /src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2099 Jan 5 00:19:15 leafy kernel: 2nd 0xc2667e34 filedesc structure (filedesc struc\ ture) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:2106 The kernel is only about 40 mins old

systat -ifstat patch

2003-01-04 Thread Trent Nelson
I've written an extension to systat that allows you to monitor the traffic through active network interfaces on the system, akin to netstat -I. I've attached the patch to this e-mail, but it can also be found at http://arpa.com/~trent/systat-ifstat-current.patch[.tar.gz]. All

Re: LOR on SIGINFO...

2003-01-04 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I pressed ctrl-T to see how far my compile had come and was rewarded > with a LOR: > > llock order reversal > 1st 0xc0347680 sched lock (sched lock) @ ../../../kern/tty.c:2386 > 2nd 0xc039f3e0 sio (sio) @ ../../../dev/sio/sio.c:3200 > Debugger("witn

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
swear> BTW, I was suprised to find several help files only under /usr/src swear> and the Sendmail Installation and Operation only under that and not swear> yet built from the source "op.me". (PR worthy?) op.me is built and installed in /usr/share/doc/smm/08.sendmailop/. cf/README is installed as

Re: Compilation failure on x86

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Holm writes: >Hi, >I tried upgrading this morning but compilation fails with the following error >(I waited a while and cvsup'd again in case someone was commiting, didn't >help) It seems like your #includes are not in sync with your userland, did you use "m

sparc1 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc2 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc4 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc8 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc16 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc32 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc32 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc32 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Paul Saab
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Compilation failure on x86

2003-01-04 Thread David Holm
Hi, I tried upgrading this morning but compilation fails with the following error (I waited a while and cvsup'd again in case someone was commiting, didn't help) ===> lib/libkvm Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/lib/libkvm gcc -O2 -pipe -march=pentiumpro -DLIBC_SCCS -I

LOR on SIGINFO...

2003-01-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I pressed ctrl-T to see how far my compile had come and was rewarded with a LOR: llock order reversal 1st 0xc0347680 sched lock (sched lock) @ ../../../kern/tty.c:2386 2nd 0xc039f3e0 sio (sio) @ ../../../dev/sio/sio.c:3200 Debugger("witness_lock") Stopped at Debugger+0x54: xchgl %ebx,in

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
Can someone please fix whereintheworld to grok the new make regression test output, so it doesn't get confused and dump the entire world output in the emails? Kris msg49629/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

ia64 tinderbox failure

2003-01-04 Thread Peter Wemm
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [resolution] Re: sendmail (Re: 5.0-RC2 informal PR: 90 sec sendmail delay)

2003-01-04 Thread Terry Lambert
[ There is a genuine FreeBSD bug or two at the root of your problem ] "Gary W. Swearingen" wrote: > I guess you're saying IPv6 is a "sendmail" default and not a OS default; > "ping localhost" says it's pinging "127.0.0.1", not "::1". Ping is ICMP echo datagrams; it requires a different ping for I

i386 error on usr/src/usr.sbin/crunch/crunchide

2003-01-04 Thread Dikshie
I try to upgrade my FreeBSD-5.0-DP1 and I got : -- sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -o root -g wheel -m 555 maybe_stripped /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin/strip ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/doc echo "===> usr.sbin/crunch/crunchide"; cd /usr/s

Re: panic with panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small...

2003-01-04 Thread phk
In message <03a701c2b38c$8e3ad990$471b3dd4@dual>, "Willem Jan Withagen" writes: >Which seems a problem sticking up it's head once so often. >I had it happen to me now 3 times over the last day. It just drops into the debugger. >And I've foun little extra info in the archive. > >What dows this actua