On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:35:34 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
BTW to jhb: Can you check your mailer's list configuration. You
appear to be adding freebsd-current@freebsd.org and leaving
curr...@freebsd.org in the Cc list.
It's a feature of kmail that the kmail developers refuse to provide
an
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:35:34 pm Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2012-Aug-22 15:35:01 -0400, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmm. Perhaps we could use a debouncer to ignore short link flaps? Kind of
gross (and OpenBSD doesn't do this). For now this change basically ignores
link up
Hi,
I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH within a device driver.
As a matter of fact, as i read the definitions in sys/kernel.h
I almost wonder whether we need the TUNABLE_INT form at all.
can anyone help clarify the differences ?
thanks
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH within a device driver.
TUNABLE_INT is basically the statically initializer version of
TUNABLE_INT_FETCH.
In short terms, you will use
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH within a device driver.
TUNABLE_INT is basically the statically initializer
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
I am trying to make netmap adapt the amount of memory it allocates
to what is available. At its core, it uses contigmalloc() with
small chunks (even down to 1 page) to fetch memory.
Problem is, i notice that before
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH within a
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:48:27AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
I am trying to make netmap adapt the amount of memory it allocates
to what is available. At its core, it uses contigmalloc() with
small chunks (even down to 1
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
database into the port installation/status, using
sed/grep/portmaster/portmanager/.sh scripts/find/pipes etc... to fix stuff.
For instance, an
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
database into the port installation/status, using
sed/grep/portmaster/portmanager/.sh
On 23 Aug 2012 17:50, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation
of /var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as
a database into the port installation/status,
On 08/23/2012 11:31, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:48:27AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Luigi Rizzori...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
I am trying to make netmap adapt the amount of memory it allocates
to what is available. At its core, it uses contigmalloc()
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
database into the port
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit unclear on what are the pros
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
...
yes i do see that.
Maybe less aggressive with M_NOWAIT but still kills processes.
Are you compiling world with MALLOC_PRODUCTION? The latest version of
whatever the default is. But:
jemalloc uses significantly more memory
On Thursday, August 23, 2012 1:40:37 pm Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo
On 8/23/2012 6:26 PM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg directory as a
database into the port installation/status, using
sed/grep/portmaster/portmanager/.sh
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
portmaster or via core dumping install. By installing on one box,
my home box, port security/cyrus-sasl2 manually, luckily install and
mtree didn't coredump and it worked - and this procedure rescued me.
But on my lab's
On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a package registry... I use each /var/db/pkg
On 23 August 2012 20:50, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:50:11PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation
On 2012-08-23 21:50, Kris Moore wrote:
On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the deprecation of
/var/db/pkg as a
On 08/23/2012 16:31, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-08-23 21:50, Kris Moore wrote:
On 08/23/2012 13:10, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Kris Moore k...@pcbsd.org wrote:
On 08/23/2012 12:26, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
I am following with dread the planned implementation of the
Hm, it's sqlite, so if the tables are indexed correctly, that should
be a quick query?
Or is it recursing through each dependency and listing that too?
adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 8/22/2012 5:27 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 21/08/2012 22:15, Doug Barton wrote:
And in this case, it doesn't matter how awesome the new tools
are, they are a MAJOR paradigm shift for how users interact with
ports, and we are
Unless I've
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:50:11PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
Well, it was about time I got to doing a benchmark of this anyway :)
I did quick benchmark of how one of our utilities parses through a list
of 1k packages on a newer i5 system:
First test, using /var/db/pkg/pkg check we have been
On Aug 23, 2012, at 11:45 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
...
yes i do see that.
Maybe less aggressive with M_NOWAIT but still kills processes.
Are you compiling world with MALLOC_PRODUCTION? The latest version of
whatever the
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it is
run vs. the first time. I can imagine a user saying I ran pkg, but it
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:19:57PM -0400, Steve Wills wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
is run vs.
On 8/23/2012 3:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
is run vs. the first time. I
On 8/23/2012 5:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
is run vs. the first time. I
Le Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:27:13 +0200,
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org a écrit :
Hello,
So, opinions? There may still be time to fix it for 9.1 if we can
decide quickly.
I do personnally have no opinion on this, I have hesitated long
between both before choosing /usr/sbin/pkg.
I'm
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:19:57 -0400
Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg
to /usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint,
it is confusing that running the command gets different results the
second time it
On 23 August 2012 18:19, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command gets different results the second time it
is run
On Aug 23, 2012, at 9:57 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 18:19, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that renaming the pkg binary in /usr/sbin/pkg to
/usr/sbin/pkg-bootstrap would make sense. From a user standpoint, it is
confusing that running the command
On 23 August 2012 22:05, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why can't one of those steps be to run pkg-bootstrap?
Because the how-to may not be for a new system ;)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:05, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why can't one of those steps be to run pkg-bootstrap?
Because the how-to may not be for a new system ;)
The possibility of bad docs somewhere outside of our control, when we can
On 23 August 2012 22:15, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:05, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why can't one of those steps be to run pkg-bootstrap?
Because the how-to may not be for a new system ;)
The
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:23 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:15, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:05, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why can't one of those steps be to run pkg-bootstrap?
Because
On 23 August 2012 22:55, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
As far as I understand it, POLA is about changing existing things:
okay, so forget POLA. My point is that a user following a how to or
even *our* documentation on how to install something unrelated, like
say, apache, will be very
On 8/23/2012 7:23 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:15, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:08 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:05, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
Why can't one of those steps be to run pkg-bootstrap?
Because the how-to
On 23 August 2012 22:59, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
No, POLA refers to not changing long-established practices out from
under the user.
forget pola
I tend to agree with Steve here ... we can't be responsible for other
people's poorly written docs.
This isn't about poorly written
Hello!
Does anybody get same error at buildworld with recent -current?
clang -Os -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Qunused-arguments -march=core2
-I/usr/src/lib/libc/include -I
/usr/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/usr/src/lib/libc/amd64 -DNLS
-D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/usr/src/
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 23 August 2012 22:55, Steve Wills swi...@freebsd.org wrote:
As far as I understand it, POLA is about changing existing things:
okay, so forget POLA. My point is that a user following a how to or
even *our* documentation on how to install something
On 08/23/2012 12:45, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:08:40PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
...
yes i do see that.
Maybe less aggressive with M_NOWAIT but still kills processes.
Are you compiling world with MALLOC_PRODUCTION? The latest version of
whatever the default is. But:
45 matches
Mail list logo
