Re: ath0 card: CardBus card activiation failed

2003-08-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Martin Jessa wrote: : : > It works, unplug the card once or twice and try again. : > Same shit happens to me pretty frequently. : : The card has worked _perfectly_ on first plug-in before I b

Re: ath0 card: CardBus card activiation failed

2003-08-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lukas Ertl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : with a kernel from this morning I can't get my ath0 Cardbus device up : again, when I plug it in, I get: : : cbb1: CardBus card activation failed : : The card has worked fine up until now. Maybe some of the rece

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:53AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > nothi

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 11:16:53AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > nothing. The 16-bit cards have always had issues on some machines or : > with some cards. rather than mapping the cis in,

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-16 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt

Re: if_xl borked in current!!

2003-08-16 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: : > : > Upgraded laptop from 5.1 to -current was as usual a bad idea, this : > time the xl driver broke (and wi is still useless BTW) leaving me :

Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach

2003-08-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : : On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : : > : John B

Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach

2003-08-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : John Baldwin writes: : > : > No, generic modules would always work with all kernels except for : > exceptional cases like PAE (unavoidable, really), and MUTEX_PROFILING : > (this is a debugging thing,

Re: usbd does not use detach

2003-08-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:38:07 -0700 : John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : > : > This is a bit more complex than this. There are many more layers between : > usb and VFS. For USB umass devices, they

Re: usbd does not use detach

2003-08-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Eric Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : #DETACH_FORCE: Clients using the device must be disconnected, : > : #typically by revoking open file desc

Re: Dhclient fix for systems with media settings

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > Is this going to cure the cases where using DHCP results in my network : > link going dead about ~30 minutes after getting a lease? At that point : > it starts spitting out timeout errors and stuff, and i have

Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I can tell you first hand that this is painful. However, in the case of : PAE, it's somewhat neccessary since certain fundamental types change : size. I can envision solutions for this, but I'm not sure if they a

Re: problems with wi driver.

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
: Is there a better way to toggle the start address for 16 bit and 32 bit : cards with sysctl?? u_long cbb_start_16_io = CBB_START_16_IO; TUNABLE_INT("hw.cbb.start_16_io", (int *)&cbb_start_16_io); SYSCTL_ULONG(_hw_cbb, OID_AUTO, start_16_io, CTLFLAG_RW, &cbb_start_16_io, CBB_START_16_IO,

Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On 14-Aug-2003 Andrew Gallatin wrote: : > : > John Baldwin writes: : > > : > > On 14-Aug-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: : > > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 02:10:19AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: : > > >> Luoqi Chen

Re: usbd does not use detach

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : It should also have a hint to indicate that this device could potentially go : away at any time, so it shouldn't cache anything if at all possible. : (Although it would be good if the user could elect to ov

Re: Change to kernel+modules build approach

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On 14-Aug-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: : > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 02:10:19AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: : >> Luoqi Chen wrote: : > [...] : >> >On the other hand, all modules should create all the opt_*.h files :

Re: usbd does not use detach

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eric Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : #DETACH_FORCE: Clients using the device must be disconnected, : #typically by revoking open file descriptors. May not : #return EBUSY due to client activitiy, but may return : #that or

Re: HEADSUP: pca driver being retired.

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Murray wr : ites: : : >Would it be a useful exercise for the minority(?) of users who use this : >driver to either see if it can be effectively newbussed or turned int

Re: GEOM/vinum compatibility

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 06:38:51AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" : > writes: : > : > >> and it seems that vinum does not respect the D_NOGIANT flag whi

Re: Problem with dhclient & wi0 on resume.

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.14.1) There are some known issues with lucent cards and the new wi driver. A work around would be to upgrade firmware to the latest available. This problem is poorly understood,

Re: ath0 driver

2003-08-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : >>>>> "M" == M Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : M> The ath driver doesn't work with broadcom hardware. You will need : M> to write your

Re: wi0 Doesn't on 11Mbps!!!

2003-08-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Marcos Biscaysaqu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I have a prism 2.5 firmaware 1.5.6 but I can't make work this in 11Mbps The firmware always reports 2Mbps in hostap mode, so the driver always reports 2mbps. this is a cosmetic issue. it would be better

Re: ath0 driver

2003-08-08 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > "Sam" == Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : >> I just have to ask: is this in any way related to the a/b/g network : >> card in my laptop that shows up as: : >> : >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class

Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT?

2003-08-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eirik Oeverby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : To the maintainers: Take your time. Better do it right than do it quick : and dirty. It works in 4.x, and 5.x is not considered stable yet so if : anyone expects everything to work they are in error. It is abou

Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT?

2003-08-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : bit annoying, but it seems to me that he's asking a perfectly : legitimate question -- if things worked fine in the past (including : the firmware versions at the time), and they don't work now, then why : is

Re: Lucent IBSS mode doesn't work in -CURRENT?

2003-08-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thursday, 31 July 2003 at 9:30:31 +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: : > Hey, : > : > I have a few Orinoco cards, and they 'work' in both ad-hoc and : > infrastructure mode. However with dhclient it gets tr

Re: 4.8->Current & Depreciated files

2003-07-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Benjamin Close <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Hi All, : I'm about to upgrade from FreeBSD 4.8 to Current (following the : instructions in UPDATING) and was just wondering if mergemaster removes : depreciated files between the two versions. Ie: /etc/r

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : Hi Folks, : : I had a closer loom at the OMAPI stuff in dhclient. : : Just to say, I'm very disappointed. The only objects that exist are: : "control" and "interface". The later is not inplemented at all. :

Re: STEP 2, fixing dhclient behaviour with multiple interfaces

2003-07-29 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: : : > > You could add kevents for interface arrival and departure, and : > > add a kqueue to the dhcpd to catch the arrival/departure events, : > > and then just

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sunday, 27 July 2003 at 22:32:42 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sunday, 27 July 2003 at 22:17:32 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sunday, 27 July 2003 at 22:11:29 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > Where are you getting the data? A windows tool? : : If you're talking about the BIOS c

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
Where are you getting the data? A windows tool? Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Sure. The data at offset 0xc are: : : C000: 55 AA 78 E9 44 06 00 00-00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 U.x.D... : : The 0xaa55 is the BIOS signature ("Here be a BIOS"), and the 0x78 is : the l

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 22:18:59 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey&qu

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Presuming that it's the ROM driver, I get this in the dmesg I posted: : pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum That's likely the problem. However, PnP BIOS information isn't the same thing that the orm[si

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 18:44:43 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey&quo

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 11:27:06 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "Greg 'groggy' Leh

Re: Mapping Video BIOS?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : machine doesn't have a serial port, so I can't apply a kernel debugger : to find out what's going on. Does it have a firewire port? Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The reason I keep saying that is that nobody knows for sure. Nobody : has reverse engineered anything, got sued and won (or lost). Just However, there are one or two cases that

Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?

2003-07-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wesley Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Doug White wrote: : : > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > > : Can they now take "they took relevant steps" as a defence in a la

Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?

2003-07-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adrian Chadd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thu, Jul 24, 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : Can't they just

Re: We have ath, now what about Broadcom?

2003-07-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Can't they just redact that information from the spec.? Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different frequencies that a

Re: Buildworld fails in 5.1

2003-07-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Gordon Tetlow wrote: : > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:36:37AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: : >>Hmmm... Is that what .ORDER is for? To work around a : >>parallel make that gratuitously rebuilds things? : > : > Righ

Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2003-07-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Noriyoshi Kawano wrote: : : > I have similar problem. : > disable re-route interrupts. : > It's works fine. : > : > --- /sys/dev/pci/pci.c.orig Tue Jul 1 23:08:32 2003 : > +++ /sys/dev/

compressed modules

2003-07-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
Please try the enclosed patch. It adds support to sysinstall for compressed modules. I think this will save some space on the drivers disk since it isn't currently compressed (unless I'm smoking the good stuff). Warner Index: modules.c

Re: Problems with fxp0 on T30 with 5.1-RELEASE

2003-07-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tobias Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: this is caused by : an irq conflict. the bug was introduced some time between 5.0 and : 5.1. i have no idea how to solve this, maybe someone else can help : here. maybe the ibm ps2 tool offers some help. details?

Re: newbus questions

2003-07-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm working on ECDT support for ACPI and ran into a couple newbus-related : questions. : : 1. I'm using the identify entry as a way to get called early on in the : boot process. However, this does not happen bef

Re: ivar changes in newbus?

2003-07-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
This is a complaint from the new compiler. That's what changed. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : So for the one way conversion of signed to unsigned it will behave like : 2's compliment : all the time. What about back to signed? Same way. It will be reduced by the maximum value of the range plus one to

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Sunday, July 13, 2003, at 1:11PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Jilles Tjoelker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : The com

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : You keep saying this... where is this "must behave as two's compliment : stated?" Read the fine print on the signed to unsigned conversion and you find that it must be done modulo 2^N. Also, I never stated t

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
: > 134 #define __glibcpp_signed(T) ((T)(-1) < 0) : #define __glibcpp_signed(T) (!((T)(-1) > 0)) Why not the simpler: #define __glibcpp_signed(T) ((T)(-1) <= 0) that way we have an overlap on the range of the two types, so we won't get a warning. We know for a fact that -1 != 0

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jilles Tjoelker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The compiler moans about (T)(-1) >= 0 as well. Is the assumption that : (unsigned type)(-1) is never zero valid? yes. There are no known machines where -1 == 0 for types of different signs. Further, the C s

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Short of fixing offending files in FSF libstdc++ or turning warning : suppression back on for standard C++ include files selectively, I have : no suggestion. In the past I know that FSF has accepted patches

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

2003-07-13 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I think that this is a FreeBSD issue. I compiled : the same file under Linux, with a GCC 3.3.1 checked out on 7/11 : and did not encounter this warning. keep in mind that on linux the -wno-system-headers is

Re: [acpi-jp 2393] Re: Updated ec-burst.diff patch

2003-07-10 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Please send me your patch for reseting USB on resume. I will test it and : commit it. Acutally, I have some generic resume stuff in the pipeline, so please run it by me too. Too many drivers do too many bogus t

Re: HTT on single CPU?

2003-07-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : P4's below ~3.1GHz do not actually provide

Re: The upcoming GCC 3.3+ upgrade

2003-07-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : GCC 3.3+ will be a system compiler throughout RELENG_5 lifetime. Thanks for the excellent summary. However, can you be a little more explicit as to the time frame that 3.3 will happen? Also, in the past pe

Re: HTT on single CPU?

2003-07-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : P4's below ~3.1GHz do not actually provide logical CPU support. We have several 2.4GHz parts that appear to contradict this statement. However, we can't use HTT w/o a proper motherboard that supports HTT CPUs.

Re: Broken ep0

2003-07-09 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : If I were to start instrumenting ep(4) with debug printf's, where is : the best place to start? I'm not sure that printf is the right way to track this down. You are seeing, iirc, that ep0 "works" for a period o

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Reverting pccbb.c to 1.75 fixed this for me. Then the fixes to if_ep are still insufficient... Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: [current] hostap+wi

2003-07-06 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Uh sorry, it was very late in the night here; of course I meant Lucent : chipsets when asking if they also support host-ap mode. What are : these add-ins you're talking about? The add-ins that I'm talking abo

Re: [current] hostap+wi

2003-07-05 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jon Disnard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm not aware of any other chips that allow for this groovy hostap mode : unless the formerly unsupported atheros chips do. I figure the idea is : not unique, and the feature seems logical for vendors to build t

Re: [current] hostap+wi

2003-07-05 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 04:48:09PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote: : [...] : > The hostap machine is 4.8-STABLE and the client is 5.1-RELEASE. : > : One nice thing about the hostap is that bridge(4) works with wi(

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

2003-07-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I would go test wireless links, but if_wi stopped working for my notebook. The wireless link is fine. I haven't upgraded it in a while, and it is working great. It does have some bursty packet loss that I can't

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" writes: : > Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was : > broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time : > ag

Re: 3COM ep0 pccard device broken in current.

2003-07-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
Have you gotten all of the recent changes to current wrt ep0? It was broken by my making cbbintr mpsafe. Well, it was broken a long time ago, my change just opened a race that used to be won, but now is lost. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list h

Re: Does newreno work as designed ?

2003-07-04 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm sitting on a ISDN line right now, and I thought the newreno issues : had been solved, but by disabling newreno I get a distinctly better : web-surfing experience. : : Is newreno working as designed righ

Re: Updated ec-burst.diff patch

2003-07-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Fl

Re: Current Cardbus/pcmcia problems

2003-07-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
H, I'm starting to think that it would make sense for someone to buy/loan me a laptop that is having these problems. None of my laptops are new enough to see the problems... Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/

Re: Can't connect to wireless network with recent -CURRENT

2003-07-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I think the same problem was reported by Rob Holmes two weeks ago and by : me (although with lesser detail) yesterday. I converted my kernel from : OLDBUS to NEWBUS and now one out of four or five tries the card

Re: WLAN card not working anymore

2003-07-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : my "Avaya Wireless PC Card" (actually seems to be a Lucent) stopped to : work in my laptop as I updated the kernel today. It now says "pcic0: Card : type unrecognized by bridge is unsupported.". What does this me

Re: Updated ec-burst.diff patch

2003-07-03 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Florian Smeets wrote: : > I set hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode=0 in loader.conf but when i was trying to : > chek if it was set to 0 with sysctl hw.acpi.ec.burst_mode i got : : > : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [

usb video devices

2003-07-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
Are there any inexpensive vga out video devices that support FreeBSD and X? Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: cardbus network problem with -current

2003-07-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
Can you turn on the following debugging and try again? Also, please post questions relating to cardbus/pccard to mobile@ since I read that more often than I read [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks much. hw.cardbus.debug: 1 hw.cardbus.cis_debug: 1 hw.cbb.debug: 1 Warner ___

Re: errors under g++ 3.2.2

2003-07-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > file IO using gives error messages about implicit typenames : > being deprecated, and I can't for the life of me figure out what to do : > my code to make the compiler happy : : Change your /usr/include/

Re: HEADS UP: Atheros 802.11 support

2003-07-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Gregory P. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 11:40:13PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: : > My work to support the Atheros 802.11 hardware is now entirely in the tree : > and enabled for use. The ath driver supports all Atheros har

Re: HEADS UP: Atheros 802.11 support

2003-06-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : My work to support the Atheros 802.11 hardware is now entirely in the tree : and enabled for use. The ath driver supports all Atheros hardware devices : and makes FreeBSD the first open source system to support

Re: HEADS UP: new wlan code

2003-06-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Please report any new problems to me (not Warner). Especially since Warner's response time will be measured in weeks until the end of July. This does kind of imply that Sam is now on the hook for the Lucent stuf

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
This works for all my ata-like cards. I've gone ahead and committed it... Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) writes: : P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that : broke support for my 3Com 3c575C cardbus ethernet NIC. It looks like my 3ccfe575ct is working well as of lasts week's current. Any pub

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. If you are uninterested in working with us to get things in, then your patch will not lasts the evening as such an

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
Lose the attitude in the patch and email. otherwise it looks good. I'd rather that we had a table rather than doing the string coparison, but I can fix that after your commit. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li

Re: PATCH: move cardbus container to "pci" devclass

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
First, CardBus is not PCI. It is a derivative of PCI that has its own, weird rules for configuring cards. Our current implementation doesn't follow all the weird rules, since most cardbus hardware is the same silicon as pci hardware. However, for attachment and such there likely needs to be a di

Re: 8MB install

2003-06-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M-Trade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Hello, : : Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486 : w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install. : : avail memory = (245760) 0 MB : : Is this expected behavior? Yes. The generic kernel is a big fat pigdog.

Re: acpi patch for dell laptop?

2003-06-25 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : Speaking about ACPI, has anyone

Re: acpi patch for dell laptop?

2003-06-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Speaking about ACPI, has anyone figured out how to close the lid : without suspending? I remember before, when the lid was closed, it would add the following to your /boot/loader.conf: hw.acpi.lid_switch_

Re: cardbus and xircom ethernet problem

2003-06-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I have just tried this and this puts the machine in a hard lock with : CISTPL_NONE 00 scrolling up the screen constantly until after 30 seconds : or so it panics with page fault 12 in cbb0. Life sucks for you then. :-

Re: Is DRI on FreeBSD unmaintained?

2003-06-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Lefteris Chatzibarbas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Is DRI on FreeBSD unmaintained? Am I sending my problem report to the : wrong place? What should I do or who should I contact about this? anholt is currently on vacation... Warner ___

Re: cardbus and xircom ethernet problem

2003-06-21 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : pccard0: Card has no functions! This means that there are problems reading the CIS. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free

Re: [current] Re: ACPI suspending.

2003-06-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > M> S4 works on my fiva, but it seems to have a S4BIOS S4 state because : > M> the bios does the save to disk... : > : > I would assume that this requires some form of DOS-like parition? : : Actually, it re

Re: Problems with wi on 5.1-CURRENT

2003-06-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Robert Hulme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Yesterday I sent in an email to freebsd-current about the problems with : wi in 5.1-Current. There haven't been any replies to suggest anyone : knows why this is happening, how to fix it, or anyone looking into

Re: [current] Re: ACPI suspending.

2003-06-19 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > "Mark" == Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : Mark> Ok, it would really help if you try and document all cases until : Mark> you at least exactly know the behavior. From there we can go on. :

Re: Multiple cardbus devices? (RFI)

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Craig Boston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 08:21, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > Does the following, untested, patch help any better than your gross : > kludges? : : Hrm, actually it seems to have made it worse... Now

Re: ACPI testing/debugging guide?

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : In the last episode (Jun 17), Scott Lambert said: : > Is there some list of actions to preform and data to collect that : > would assist with getting the ACPI stuff lined out? : > : > I've read the acpiconf man pa

Re: Problems with pcmcia on 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christian Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Christian Laursen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : pccar

Re: Multiple cardbus devices? (RFI)

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
Does the following, untested, patch help any better than your gross kludges? It forces 12 bit aligment of the allocations for CardBus devices as well as for 'R2' 16-bit devices (which were already forced). One might be able to share the 4k range between devices if one had, say, two xl cards (I'd

Re: Multiple cardbus devices? (RFI)

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
: I've tried an awful hack of forcing a minimum size of 0x1000 for all : resource allocations made by cardbus devices to make sure they're : page-aligned and it seems to be working. There are occasional : watchdog timeouts on the xl device, but it is at least functioning at : the same time as the

Re: Need acpi-event-d?

2003-06-17 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Simon L. Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On 2003.06.16 07:07:36 -0400, David Gilbert wrote: : > First, I must say that it's cool that ACPI code can be examined and : > rewritten. In my laptop's case, this was key to make things fairly : > happy.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >