: MAC/ntpd (mac_ntpd)
root@colossus:~ # uname -a
FreeBSD colossus.isux.com 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r346979
GENERIC amd64
root@colossus:~ #
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https
' of
FreeBSD and someone I respect and I know would not be putting 'kludges'
and substandard code into the trees... Direct your anger elsewhere,
whilst still making valid points.
Regards,
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd
parietal art remained fixed.
In all, a discomfiture of abundance. View the rubrics below, and
marvel
at their profusion and magnitude! Marvel!
You're trolling right?
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
help here, I don't have time to debug as too busy fixing
broken systems from Sept 1 changes.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
The ports tree has been modified to only support pkg(8) as package management
system for all supported version of FreeBSD.
if you were still using pkg_install (pkg_* tools) you will have to upgrade
your
system.
The simplest
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of
Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more.
Ahh so all those Windows XP servers are dead and don't work anymore...
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Mathieu Arnold wrote:
+--On 3 septembre 2014 16:36:29 +0200 Michelle Sullivan
miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
| Mathieu Arnold wrote:
| I still don't see what you have to say about what EOL mean, it's *End Of
| Life* meaning after, it is dead, and won't exist any more.
|
|
| Ahh so all those
that the EOL was
not actually an EOL and it was actually a deadline.
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:47, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
Marcus von Appen wrote:
Alban Hertroys haram...@gmail.com:
I can totally understand that at some point it starts to get
impossible to maintain two separate packaging systems and I
Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net
wrote:
This is my only option - however, I suspect I'm already f**ked - my
build servers kicked off at 4am and the non pkg jails automatically
converted themselves to pkg.. the pkg jails
/pkg_install
Please note that this branch is not officially maintained and that we strongly
recommend that you do migrate to pkg(8)
Best regards,
Bapt on behalf of portmgr
And for the portsnap users?
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
packages
having a copy of the ports tree is not required.
Correct, take a 9.2 install disk, install it, portsnap and then install
pkg on it... Oh wait, you can't.. pkg_install is broken, and 9.2
install disks don't have pkg in the BaseOS
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org
Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.09.01 21:27, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Actually it's an inconvenience for someone like me and you. Not for
many freebsd users, and certainly not for me 6 months ago if I hadn't
been writing my own ports oh and what was it, 1.3.6 - 1.3.7? broke
shit... (badly
Julian Elischer wrote:
You should try arguing with someone like Bank of Americas security and
operations
department
You work for the same company as me?
some day about whether they want to suddenly upgrade 300 machines
for no real reason (from their perspective).
--
Michelle Sullivan
Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2014.09.01 22:09, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
That's my point - there was a patch waiting to submit that knowingly
broke pkg_install at midnight on the day after the EOL... the EOL
shouldn't be an EOL - because it was really a 'portsnap after this date
before you
15 matches
Mail list logo
