Re: MCE: Does this look possibly like a slot issue?

sors, 6-core/12-Thread. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU > > > E5645 @ 2.40GHz (2400.20-MHz K8-class CPU) > > > > > > I'll bring it down and swap DIMMS around > > > > > > On 06/20/2022 7:57 pm, Ultima wrote: > > > > > > Hey Larry, > >

Re: MCE: Does this look possibly like a slot issue?

the motherboard model? Also, do you have multiple CPUs installed in this system? Best regards, Richard Gallamore On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:41 PM Larry Rosenman wrote: > Yes and Yes. > > > On 06/20/2022 7:37 pm, Ultima wrote: > > Are you sure that the module you replace

Re: MCE: Does this look possibly like a slot issue?

t; Memory read ECC error > Memory corrected error count (CORE_ERR_CNT): 1 > Memory transaction Tracker ID (RTId): 46 > Memory DIMM ID of error: 0 > Memory channel ID of error: 1 > Memory ECC syndrome: ac298902 > STATUS 8c41009f MCGSTATUS 0 > MCGCAP 1c09 APICID 34 SOC

Re: MCE: Does this look possibly like a slot issue?

Hey Larry, It is possible it's the motherboard itself, but it's rare. The way I would determine this is to swap the DIMM module with another populated slot on the motherboard and see if the error migrated to the new slot or not. Also, this error doesn't necessarily mean there is a problem that

Re: ix SR-IOV working

Hello, This is probably a driver issue. The only way I could get sr-iov working with the ix driver is compiling the driver provided by Intel and loading it before boot. [1] for more details and [2] for the driver. Have not tested the latest version and only tested this on CURRENT. Also, there

Re: New NUMA support coming to CURRENT

Hello Jeff, Few days ago I upgraded my system firmware, upgraded base to r327991 and altered snooping to cluster-on-die. Its hard to say what is making the server feels like a completely system due to all these changes (also running llvm 6.0), but I am betting it is the NUMA optimizations. It is

Re: CURRENT: can't buildworld; /usr/bin/ld: error: cannot open crt1.o:

Try updating? just upgraded to r327991 and it was smooth sailing. On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 10:42 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > One of our CURRENT boxes is repeateadly disobeying to build "buildworld" > (make > buildkernel seems to work as I did several kernels right now). > >

Re: Stale file handle when mounting nfs

Eh... disregard my last message, the mount works properly but the mount is stuck in a hard lock state. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Stale file handle when mounting nfs

Was a bit tired last night and just wanted to make sure this issue was known. Upgraded to r324957 and everything works! yay! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: 12-current, since 323508 / Sept 13 - smartctl / smartmontools - unable to query drives

Just recently tested smartctl (a few days ago) r324135 and I found that the auto detection seems to be broken but manually selecting the device type works. Are you positive you tested every device type? I was a bit surprised to find that atacam works for my onboard controller and the HBA only

Re: input/output error @boot

Its showing... elf64_loadimage: read failed can't load file /boot/kernel/kernel Can the same when attempting to load kernel.old, had to revert to old snapshot on usb rescue. This is not a hardware problem. On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sun, Mar 5,

Re: zfs snapshot_limit is not respected

Yes just tested this and it is how it works. Thanks for the explanation. Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-uns

Re: zfs snapshot_limit is not respected

checked the dataset and it is showing no permissions granted to a user. So I guess user in this case is also including the root user, but how does one lock the property from root? I keep going through the manpage looking for something I may have missed but keep coming up empty. Thanks for replying,

zfs snapshot_limit is not respected

I recently moved some data on a box with limited space. I decided I should limit the snapshots so that space would not become an issue. I just check back a week later to find out the box is hitting the borderline. Doing I quick check I realized that the snapshot_limit is not being respected. #

Re: ISO image: where is the CLANG compiler?

If you plan on running a desktop environment like this make sure its super speed usb 3.0 or the system will be considerably slow. This is a perfect backup plan and I always have one for the ready. This is especially important when on current. I don't think you have to worry so much about having a

Re: r311568 makes freerdp very slow

I have been affected by this issue as well, just updated to r312388 and it is fixed. Thanks On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:29 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 01:46:31 PM Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > On Fri, January 13, 2017 22:46, Jakob Alvermark wrote: > > >

Re: zfs zvol's inaccessible after reboot

The volmode was set to default, which is geom. Setting to 2, dev fixes the issue! thanks Allan for the speedy solution! On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Allan Jude <allanj...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2017-01-16 12:59, Ultima wrote: > > Currently there is a bug with zvols. I h

zfs zvol's inaccessible after reboot

Currently there is a bug with zvols. I have a few Bhyve containers that startup at boot. I'v noticed in middle December of last year that after a restart the zvols become inaccessible to the container. Nothing can be done to the zvol, other than rename. It cannot even be destroyed in this state.

Re: Sluggish performance on head r311648

bler <free...@shaneware.biz> wrote: > On 11/01/2017 15:32, Ultima wrote: > >> I'v been noticing lately sluggish performance, maybe zfs? First noticed >> this a few days ago right after upgrading on Jan 7th to r311648 and the >> last upgrade before that was around dec 3

Sluggish performance on head r311648

I'v been noticing lately sluggish performance, maybe zfs? First noticed this a few days ago right after upgrading on Jan 7th to r311648 and the last upgrade before that was around dec 30-jan 1 (not sure of rev). Decided to upgrade again today. I usually build and install head every week or two,

Re: zpool (online|replace|labelclear) issues, -f option also failing

This patch looks good its too bad the core hasn't looked at it yet. Ill do some testing and report any issues found. Some points you bring up in the bug are quite valid. Thanks for working on this! =] Ultima On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Ganael LAPLANCHE <marty...@freebsd.org>

Re: zpool (online|replace|labelclear) issues, -f option also failing

nd. As the device is offline from the pool. Is this the correct behavior to show being an (ACTIVE) member of the pool? After wiping the correct area on the disk via dd, the replace successfully added the drive back to the pool! Thanks for pointing out my error. Thanks for taking a look at this Ronald a

zpool (online|replace|labelclear) issues, -f option also failing

ilar error. The -f options are not helping. Any ideas what my issue maybe? The error suggests it is currently active on the pool, however the offline should have changed that status correct? Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.f

Need help debugging rc script

Hello, I'm dealing with an odd issue with an rc script working pre-11. The change that is causing the prog to fail seems to be the new limits feature, $name_login_class. After commenting out the limits command in rc.subr, the script starts as expected. Adding limits directly in the rc script with

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

g on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM, olli hauer <oha...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2016-08-04 07:22, Ultima wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I recently had some issue with a PSU and ran several scrubs on a pool > with > > around 35T

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

o be clear, this is expected behavior with atime=off + TXGs during offline time? I had thought that the resilver after onlining the disk would bring that disk up-to-date with the pool. I guess my understanding was a bit off. Ultima ___ freebsd-current@fr

rc scripts new login_class, default can break old rc scripts

+ it will fail to start with... 2016-08-06 17:07:27.946432|CRITICAL|ServerLibPriv | |Server() DatabaseError out of memory Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send

Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

:/usr/src/head/obj/usr/src/head/src/sys/MYKERNEL-NODEBUG amd64 Sorry for the wall of text, but I hope this helps in tracking down this possible bug. Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

Re: mfi driver performance too bad on LSI MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i

If anyone is interested, as Michelle Sullivan just mentioned. One problem I found when looking for an HBA is that they are not so easy to find. Scoured the internet for a backup HBA I came across these - http://www.avagotech.com/products/server-storage/host-bus-adapters/#tab-12Gb1 Can only speak

Re: Boot environments and zfs canmount=noauto

Is this actually required? Instead of the extra steps, how about just moving/creating each dataset into each BE (or at least the ones desired) and setting them to mountpoint=inherit. With zfs_enable="YES" this should mount the dataset appropriately. Only the root BE should need canmount=noauto

Re: sr-iov's virtual function driver shipped broken?

/pipermail/freebsd-current/2016-March/060350.html Just opened PR211062 for it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211062 On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Ngie Cooper <yaneurab...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 12, 2016, at 11:21, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com&g

sr-iov's virtual function driver shipped broken?

I'v mentioned this in the past, but I just want to verify. Will 11 be released with the virtual function driver unusable? Currently iovctl will only work in pass-through mode. ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase

If multiple kernels are being installed like this, eg KERNCONF="FOO BAR", which of the two would be default during boot? FOO because it came first? On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:05 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Saturday, May 07, 2016 06:50:05 AM David Wolfskill wrote: > > [Recipient

Re: ixv device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 (was sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100)

Jeb, Okay, just wanted to make sure it was known. =] Ultima On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:36 PM, cramerj <cram...@intel.com> wrote: > Yeah, we're running into some issues with our implementation. I'm working > on the VF driver now and hope to get some of these bugs fixed within the &

ixv device_attach: ixv0 attach returned 5 (was sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100)

false; } VF-1 { passthrough : false; } Any ideas? Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

ed 5 On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have been interested in this when I first read about it in 2012. =] > > Can this be done in loader.conf? I have vmm_load="YES" > > I'm not sure if the vf's are usable, I have not actua

Re: CURRENT slow and shaky network stability

Having this long timeout issue occur many times during the day. Normally not this bad, currently on r297060 amd64. A few hours ago had a system hang that lasted for about 1-2 hours.(not sure how long exactly, gave up waiting) It occured after a zfs destroy operation and affected sshd. (could no

Re: Current-11 slow

Upgrade your source and reinstall, this issue was fixed sometime around r296377. On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Baho Utot wrote: > Current-11 is slower than FreeBSD-10.2 on my dell lapfart > > I fetched and complied current-11 r296326 following the handbook. > I

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

Just upgraded again to r296709. Running for about an hour, performance appears to be restored. Will report back if this changes. On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, the total cost would be hard to calculate, not all of it was > purchased at t

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

Should I restart and provide this info after 20min into build? Or is this good info? On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > last pid: 96327; load averages: 41.78, 50.32, 50.07up 1+05:19:23 > 18:52:47 > 169 processes: 11 running, 158 sleep

Re: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

now. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Allan Jude <allanj...@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 03/11/2016 18:49, Ultima wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. > This > > system in question is a poudriere building sy

Significant performance hit on recent upgrade

regression on recent commit? Previously was running (sorry had git src at the time) 8b372d1(master) built around a week ago. Any ideas what maybe causing this? I can provide more details if needed, someone in irc also mentioned noticing a hit in performance. Ultima

Re: zfsboot patch for /usr

No need to ignore the output of zfs list, here is an explanation of zfs list's output, this is in the zfs man page. I think you're confusing used with refer. used The amount of space consumed by this dataset and all its descendents. This is the value that is checked against

Re: zfsboot patch for /usr

Zfs automatically creates directories needed to be mounted, it would be a wasted effort making directories for zfs. I don't really understand your issue with an unused /usr dataset, but you can just modify the ZFSBOOT_DATASETS area of the script to get accomplish what you're trying to do. On

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

now if you're still interested in this, but did you do "kenv > hw.vmm.force_iommu=1" before loading the vmm module? I think that might be > necessary. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:12 PM Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, still getting the -100 error, I do h

Re: error: unknown type name 'd_thread_t'

Hello chris, d_thread_t was a compatible shim to support FreeBSD 4. It was removed in current some time ago, changing to struct thread should fix this error. Ultima On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Chris H <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > Greetings, all. > Apologie

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

en trying to load the VF driver? > > I've tried SR-IOV on a system here, and I can confirm that traffic stops > passing on the PF interface when you create a VF interface. That didn't > used to happen, so I'm investigating why that is right now. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:09 AM U

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

k I listed the motherboards in question yet so ill list them now. S1200BTLRM - http://ark.intel.com/products/69633/Intel-Server-Board-S1200BTLRM?q=S1200BTLRM MD80-TM0 - http://b2b.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=5146#ov I'm not sure if it will be of any help th

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

played a role in this. If you have any ideas, I'm willing to test them. Thanks! =] VT-d screen: https://puu.sh/niyiq/4fee92e4a3.jpgn PCI advanced options: https://puu.sh/niyjg/88e71e48d9.jpgn Ultima On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I forgot t

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

double checked VT-d, but I'll make it tripple! =] I can't reset the system right now, but ill send an update when possible with only 2 vf's and unmodified generic. Ultima On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Eric Joyner <e...@freebsd.org> wrote: > I don't really have any ideas on the e

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

Yeah, dmesg does show 48. 12 Cores and 24 threads each. 48 total On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Steven Hartland <kill...@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > isn't that 48 cores (12 real 12 virtual) per CPU? > > > On 22/02/2016 21:26, Ultima wrote: > >> This system has 24 cores

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

This system has 24 cores (e5-2670v3)x2 Ultima On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Pieper, Jeffrey E < jeffrey.e.pie...@intel.com> wrote: > Just out of curiosity, how many cores does your system have? > > Jeff > > -Original Message- > From: owner-freebsd-curr...@free

Re: sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

pair On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Eric Joyner <e...@freebsd.org> wrote: > Did you do an ifconfig up on ix1 before loading the VF driver? > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:57 AM Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Decided to do some testing with iovctl to see

sr-iov issues, reset_hw() failed with error -100

bclass = ethernet ppt28@pci0:129:0:189: class=0x02 card=0x00001458 chip=0x15158086 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'X540 Ethernet Controller Virtual Function' class = network subclass = ethernet Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: r294195: Kernel panic during installworld

This is actually triggered when using large blocks. "recordsize=1M" going back to 128k and I no longer panic. On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Hans Petter Selasky > wrote: > > On 02/11/16 15:00,

Re: Kernel memory leak with x11/nvidia-driver

Wow that is insane. I'm going to start looking for the revision this behavior started. If you already found it, or find it before I report back plz let me know so I don't waste my time =] On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 02/ 3/16 10:54 AM, Eric

Re: Kernel memory leak with x11/nvidia-driver

this is only visually as commands still worked, just showed a blank black screen. Also unloading the kernel modules for nvidia and nvidia-modeset (new as of 358.16ish) did not free the memory. On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies, this should have b

Re: Kernel memory leak with x11/nvidia-driver

Apologies, this should have been in my initial reply. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201340 or here for attachment https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=165694 I haven't actually had a chance to do anything after upgrading from stable other than see the

Re: r294195: Kernel panic during installworld

at 2:59 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I > didn't know it would get stripped. > > Ultima > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> https

Re: r294195: Kernel panic during installworld

https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I didn't know it would get stripped. Ultima On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Ultima <ultima1...@gmail.com> wrote: > https://puu.sh/mzmpL/b209da9263.jpgn I hope this is better, sorry I > didn't know it would

r294195: Kernel panic during installworld

make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL reboot mergemaster -p make installworld -> attached MYKERNEL=GENERIC+ options VIMAGE options ROUTETABLES=2 Anything else that maybe helpful? Ultima ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list ht

Re: r294195: Kernel panic during installworld

It builds fine, the issue is installing it. I think the panic is zfs related not actually installworld. On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > > reboot > > mergemaster -p > > make installworld -> attached > > > >