Hi,
if someone is facing the same error, the build variable MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX must
be set within the environment and _not_ within the make context. I would also
suggest that the source and object directories are on the same partition.
My sources where located in my home directory and the object
Hi,
I am currently about to setup an -CURRENT system, which should gets
updated via a build server that’s runs on -STABLE and shares the src
and obj directories via NFS to -CURRENT system.
While doing a „make -s -j 4 buildworld buildkernel“ the builds fails
randomly with the following error.
---
On 3/3/2018 10:13 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> #make toolchain
>
This is now known as DIRDEPS_BUILD. META_MODE is something different
now, see man src.conf.
This failure is not unexpected as the build breaks with LLVM updates.
I'll work on a fix this next week.
> ...
> Building
> /srv/obj/srv/src/
#make toolchain
...
Building /srv/obj/srv/src/fbsd/head/usr.bin/clang/clang-tblgen/clang-tblgen.full
c++: error: no such file or directory:
'/srv/obj/srv/src/fbsd/head/freebsd12-amd64/lib/clang/libllvmminimal/libllvmminimal.a'
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[1]: stopped in /srv/src/fbsd/head/usr.bin/
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 13:19, Roberto Rodriguez Jr wrote:
>
> Would make -DNO_CLEAN=NO also/maybe help as well?
Remove =NO from your invocation above. That would define a variable as:
${NO_CLEAN=NO}=1
HTH,
-Ngie
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing
Would make -DNO_CLEAN=NO also/maybe help as well?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:46:20PM -0500, Roberto Rodriguez Jr wrote:
> What tools can I use to make the building a little faster?
>
The src tree supports incremental builds. You'll need to load the
filemon module and add WITH_META_MODE=yes in /etc/src-env.conf to use
it. See the WITH_META_MODE
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Roberto Rodriguez Jr
> wrote:
>
> What tools can I use to make the building a little faster?
>
> I'm using an AMD 64 HP 15 laptop and I update the source tree daily and
> rebuild so if I have any errors I could report. Just curious if there's any
> extra software
> On Mar 4, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Roberto Rodriguez Jr
> wrote:
>
> What tools can I use to make the building a little faster?
>
> I'm using an AMD 64 HP 15 laptop and I update the source tree daily and
> rebuild so if I have any errors I could report. Just curious if there's any
> extra software
What tools can I use to make the building a little faster?
I'm using an AMD 64 HP 15 laptop and I update the source tree daily and
rebuild so if I have any errors I could report. Just curious if there's any
extra software I could be implementing to make the compiling faster. Thank
you
>
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:44 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:42:13PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Steve Kargl
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:29:12PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
So, how do I boo
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:42:13PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:29:12PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >> So, how do I bootstrap 11-CURRENT from 10.1-RELEASE?
> >>
> >
> > Update your so
>
> On Jun 3, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:29:12PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
>>
>> So, how do I bootstrap 11-CURRENT from 10.1-RELEASE?
>>
>
> Update your source tree.
My source tree is up-to-date as of a few hours ago.
Jon
--
jonat...@freeb
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:29:12PM -0230, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
>
> So, how do I bootstrap 11-CURRENT from 10.1-RELEASE?
>
Update your source tree.
--
Steve
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Hi all,
I’m attempting to `make buildworld` from a 10.1-RELEASE box, and I’m
encountering an error in the “bootstrap tools" stage. It looks like gzip, which
is part of the bootstrap tools, depends on `futimens` from a newish (since
February?) libc / syscall API:
$ make buildworld
[...]
usr.bin
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 04:10:30 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:06:40 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> > Am 20.05.2013 15:49, schrieb Ulrich Spörlein:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I'm running the coverity builds/scan on a 8.2 VM, buildworld was fine 7d
> > > ago, now it's kapu
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 23:06:40 +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Am 20.05.2013 15:49, schrieb Ulrich Spörlein:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm running the coverity builds/scan on a 8.2 VM, buildworld was fine 7d
> > ago, now it's kaput:
>
> ...
>
> > This is on src r250825 and the host is running
> > Fre
Am 20.05.2013 15:49, schrieb Ulrich Spörlein:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm running the coverity builds/scan on a 8.2 VM, buildworld was fine 7d
> ago, now it's kaput:
...
> This is on src r250825 and the host is running
> FreeBSD scan.freebsd.your.org 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #2 r223420: Wed
> Jun 2
Hey all,
I'm running the coverity builds/scan on a 8.2 VM, buildworld was fine 7d
ago, now it's kaput:
>>> Building an up-to-date make(1)
>>> World build started on Mon May 20 13:43:09 UTC 2013
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims
-
On May 7, 2013, at 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2013-05-07 16:01, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 7 May 2013 17:21, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> ...
>>> c++ -O2 -pipe
>>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include
>>> -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/
On 2013-05-07 16:01, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 7 May 2013 17:21, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
...
c++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../../../contrib/llvm/tools/clang/include
-I/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvmsupport/../
On 7 May 2013 17:21, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running an older -current:
>
> bewilderbeast/usr/src;uname -a
> FreeBSD bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
> #15: Thu Nov 8 14:02:45 EST 2012
> mwlu...@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org:/usr/obj/
Hi,
I'm running an older -current:
bewilderbeast/usr/src;uname -a
FreeBSD bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
#15: Thu Nov 8 14:02:45 EST 2012
mwlu...@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/G
Trying to build new, and get:
...
c++ -O2 -p
Hello.
I think I have some problem building current on my system (which is not
current).
# uname -a
FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Tue Oct 18 18:51:43 UTC 2011
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# pwd
/zpool0/testenv/sources/10-kms/lib/libc
# svn info
Path
Hi,
I've been building -current on a 4.x buildmachine on a daily basis for
about a year. The /usr/obj and /usr/src directories are nfs exported to
a testmachine running -current.
After I came back from holiday a few days ago I noticed that the install
on the -current machine gave m
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 04:25:23 +0200, you wrote:
>Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to
>build -CURRENT?
it was possible for me, but i had to go through a lot of hassles
installing -CURRENT from within -STABLE.
i used the DESTDIR-switch to install everything
What does uname -a say in single user. It should say 5.0, but I'd
guess it is saying 4.x.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tim Kientzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard H=E4ring wrote:
:
: >>"make installworld" dumps core at installing passwd (4.5-RELEASE).
:
:
: Brooks Davis:
:
: > Are you running a current kernel at this
|
|I've run into the same problem in the past but manually selected the new
|kernel. Should we add the explicit step that you need to load
|/boot/kernel/kernel when upgrading? Or has that been fixed?
|
|-Nate
I have posted atleast twice on current to add this
info to UPDATING. guess it still ha
[Redirected to current@ with sender's approval]
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Mike Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
>
> > That's why there is a "reboot" between installing the new kernel and doing
> > installworld. You need to run the new kernel to have the ABI match.
>
> From my
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Mike Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Richard Cotrina wrote:
>
> > Yes, I did. However make installworld fails as I said.
>
> I ran into the same problem going from 4.6 to 5.0-CURRENT.
>
> We used truss to see that sh was making funny calls, and concluded that
> we'd nee
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Richard Cotrina wrote:
> Yes, I did. However make installworld fails as I said.
I ran into the same problem going from 4.6 to 5.0-CURRENT.
We used truss to see that sh was making funny calls, and concluded that
we'd need to run from the kernel to get it working. We instal
Yes, I did. However make installworld fails as I said.
- Original Message -
From: "Craig Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Cotrina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:02
Hi,
Did you see the instructions in /usr/src/Makefile and /usr/src/UPDATING?
This is from /usr/src/Makefile:
# For individuals wanting to upgrade their sources (even if only a
# delta of a few days):
#
# 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
# 2. `make build
Hello :
I am getting an strange error when trying to install current ( make
installworld ). I cvsup-ed it in my 4.7- Release box, and I sompiling the
sources and the kernel without any error messages :
# make -j4 buildworld
# make buildkernel
# make installkernel
# reboot
All the above finished
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:08:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> cross-building -CURRENT on RELENG_4 is broken in src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1:
>
> --- cut here ---
> ...
> sh /usr/fbsd/HEAD/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/makeman /usr/libexec/lint1 -m >lint.7
> lint1:
* Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 16:55 -0700]:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:48:14AM +0200, Gerhard H?ring wrote:
> > * Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]:
> > > Are you running a current kernel at this point? If you aren't it's safe
> > > to say it won't work.
* Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> > * Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]:
> > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote:
> > > > Is it possible, or do I ne
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:48:14AM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> * Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]:
> > Are you running a current kernel at this point? If you aren't it's safe
> > to say it won't work.
>
> No, this is 4.5-RELEASE, as I said. By "current kernel", do you
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote:
> * Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote:
> > > Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to
> > > build -CURRE
* Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote:
> > Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to
> > build -CURRENT?
> >
> Yes, it is. It should even be possible to build -CURRENT wit
hi, there!
cross-building -CURRENT on RELENG_4 is broken in src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1:
--- cut here ---
...
sh /usr/fbsd/HEAD/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/makeman /usr/libexec/lint1 -m >lint.7
lint1: illegal option -- m
usage: lint1 [-abcdeghprstuvyzF] src dest
gzip -cn lint.7 > lint.7.gz
--- cu
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote:
> Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to
> build -CURRENT?
>
Yes, it is. It should even be possible to build -CURRENT with
as early as 4.0-RELEASE. If it doesn't, please drop me a line.
Cheer
Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to
build -CURRENT?
-- Gerhard
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:13:33PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > Nope, still getting it.
>
> I was able to reproduce the crash with your config file and unpatched
> GCC, however crash does not happen when I use the patch. Are you using
> make buildkernel or old config/make method?
Since I'
>
> >You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
> >Could you try yet another patch?
> >
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
>
> FYI, I saw the same error as Crist when building -current under 4.6,
> and with your patch, th
t; Could you try yet another patch?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
FYI, I saw the same error as Crist when building -current under 4.6, and
with your patch, the buildworld/buildkernel succeeded.
Lars
--
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> USC Information Sciences
> Nope, still getting it.
I was able to reproduce the crash with your config file and unpatched
GCC, however crash does not happen when I use the patch. Are you using
make buildkernel or old config/make method?
>
> options IPSEC_ESP
>
> That is killing it. If I comment out that option,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:43:22AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
>
> You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
> Could y
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:45 -0700
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not too sure about that. Now I'm getting SIGSEGV again,
You are right. There was a stupid mistake in the latest version, sorry.
Could you try yet another patch?
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
--
Alex
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:59:46PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:55:49 -0700
> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It seems to have worked. Thanks.
>
> Sorry for inconvenience, but could you please check that you got the
> latest version of the patch. Both
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:55:49 -0700
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to have worked. Thanks.
Sorry for inconvenience, but could you please check that you got the
latest version of the patch. Both versions will fix the bug, but the
version I copied on freefall several hours a
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 11:09:56PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL
> below. Success/failure reports are appreciated.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
It seems to have worked. Thanks.
--
Crist J. Clark
I am asking people having CPP0 dying with SIG11 to try the patch at URL
below. Success/failure reports are appreciated.
http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> > sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> >
I made
> > > sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> > > with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
> >
> > It isn't just you. The same error stopped my build of current 2-3
> > days ago on 4.6-RELEASE.
> >
> >
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 02:44:54PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> > sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me?
On 2002-09-21 23:53, "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
> sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
> with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
It isn'
Works for me:
>>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Sep 22 07:43:35 MSD 2002
$ uname -a
FreeBSD golf.macomnet.net 4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE FreeBSD
4.6-20020805-MACOMNET-STABLE #19: Fri Sep 20 17:09:52 MSD 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GOLF i386.
--
Maxim Konovalov,
I've been unable to build CURRENT on STABLE for a few days. I made
sure to bring STABLE up to date. Is this just me? Is there a problem
with building CURRENT on STABLE at the moment?
--
>>> Kernel build for GOKU started
> Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /c/ke
en/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src.
> ==
>
> Am I doing something wrong here or is building -current on -stable broken?
>
Seems to work OK here; xcalloc() and
*** Error code 1
Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src.
======
Am I doing something wrong here or is building -current on -stable broken?
Ken
--
Kenneth Merr
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:31:14 +0200
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>>--
>>...
>>===> lib/libc
>>"/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk", line 184: Inconsistent operator for libc.a
>>"/usr/
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:41:51AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:02:07 +0200
> >From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> >> >--
> >> >...
> >> >===> lib/l
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 17:02:07 +0200
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>> >--
>> >...
>> >===> lib/libc
>> >"/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk", line 184: Inconsistent operator for libc.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:33:43AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:58:24 -0800 (PST)
> >From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >cvs [update aborted]: could not find desired version 1.294 in /cvs/freebsd/src/e
> >tc/rc,v
> >freebeast(4.5-STA)[2]
>
> That, at lea
>Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 05:58:24 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cvs [update aborted]: could not find desired version 1.294 in /cvs/freebsd/src/e
>tc/rc,v
>freebeast(4.5-STA)[2]
That, at least, did not occur on my laptop.
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>
I think today is going to be "one of those days" :-(
The first hint was after I built today's -STABLE, I then fired up a
"cvs update" against my -CURRENT sources, and got:
Script started on Wed Jan 30 05:12:16 2002
freebeast(4.5-STA)[1] cd /S4/usr/src && cvs update^M
cvs update: Updating .
:On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 11:24:50AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
:
:I will fix it today.
Works like a charm now, thanks! My -current source is broken out on
my -stable machine, so the only way to compile it is via an NFS mount
to a -current machine which, for obvious reasons, needs to
hi, there!
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Chris wrote:
> Actually, last time I checked, I think stable did not install with a RO
> /usr/src either. Anyone know if this is still the case?
I have no problems with 'make installworld' with RO obj and src on
latest -stable
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail
:
:> Actually, last time I checked, I think stable did not install with a RO
:> /usr/src either. Anyone know if this is still the case?
:
:I have installed -stable many times with /usr/src mounted readonly
:via NFS.
:
:Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yah, -stable is fine.
> Actually, last time I checked, I think stable did not install with a RO
> /usr/src either. Anyone know if this is still the case?
I have installed -stable many times with /usr/src mounted readonly
via NFS.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
Actually, last time I checked, I think stable did not install with a RO
/usr/src either. Anyone know if this is still the case?
Chris
> It looks like it's trying to mess around with something in /usr/src,
> which is a read-only NFS mount. Needless to say we do not want to
> break
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:43:29AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> Something got broken in the last week or two, it never did this sort
> of thing before.
David's speedup commits to sys/conf/Makefile.*. I informed him of the
problem, and asked him to back out the hacks, but he wants the
:I will fix it today.
:
Thanks a lot Dave!
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 09:43:29AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
[snip]
> I tried 'make cleandir' in /usr/src and that does not fix the problem
> either.
Sorry, I was not clear enough. You need to do,
# cd /usr/src/sys/modules
# make cleandir
A 'cleandir' from /usr/src will not climb
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 11:24:50AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> like either you or David O'Brien (I'm guessing, your guys names are
I will fix it today.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ok, I found it. /usr/src/sys/conf/Makefile.i386 is broken. It looks
like either you or David O'Brien (I'm guessing, your guys names are
prominent in the CVS logs but I haven't tracked it down exactly)
screwed up the object directory creation while trying to optimize it.
It
:
:> While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
:>
:> ===> 3dfx
:> @ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
:> ln: @: Read-only file system
:> *** Error code 1
:>
:> Stop in /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/modules/3dfx.
:> *** Error code 1
:>
:> It looks like i
:
:On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:24:51AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
:> While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
:>
:> ===> 3dfx
:> @ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
:> ln: @: Read-only file system
:> *** Error code 1
:>
:
:Wouldn't using the buildkernel/installk
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:24:51AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
>
> ===> 3dfx
> @ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
> ln: @: Read-only file system
> *** Error code 1
>
Wouldn't using the buildkernel/installkernel targets
> While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
>
> ===> 3dfx
> @ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
> ln: @: Read-only file system
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/modules/3dfx.
> *** Error code 1
>
> It looks like it's trying to
On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 12:24:51AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:
> While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
>
> ===> 3dfx
> @ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
> ln: @: Read-only file system
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/modules/3d
While trying to run 'make depend' in /usr/src/sys/compile/BLAH I got:
===> 3dfx
@ -> /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys
ln: @: Read-only file system
*** Error code 1
Stop in /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/modules/3dfx.
*** Error code 1
It looks like it's trying to mess around with somet
Apart from the config(8) issue, I see this building GENERIC:
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include -I../../contrib/dev/acpica/Sub
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote:
> I'm attempting to update my -current system from mid-April, and
> I'm getting the following error:
make world first, or build the new binutils.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <
I'm attempting to update my -current system from mid-April, and
I'm getting the following error:
make -f ../../dev/aic7xxx/Makefile MAKESRCPATH=../../dev/aic7xxx
Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/src/sys/compile/ISTARI
cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O -pipe -Wall -Wr
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hit this problem as well. Put 'delete' in your cvsup file.
> Otherwise you'll get screwed. This is a misfeature of cvsup, imho,
I'm sorry you think so. I did it that way for backward compatibility
with sup. If I ha
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:01:10AM -0800, Tim Moore wrote:
: > CVS'uped today:
: ...
: > gcc/version.c is "dead" in my CVS repository. Has my repository been
: > corrupted somehow?
:
: Please try again. Did you change release tags or som
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:01:10AM -0800, Tim Moore wrote:
> CVS'uped today:
...
> gcc/version.c is "dead" in my CVS repository. Has my repository been
> corrupted somehow?
Please try again. Did you change release tags or something? Possibly
checked out RELENG_3 on top of the HEAD or somethin
CVS'uped today:
cd /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools; make build-tools
cannot open
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/version.c: no
such file
"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../Makefile.inc", line 28: warning: "sed
-e 's/.*\"\([^ \"]*\)[ \"].*/\1/' <
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc
On Sat, Jun 26, 1999 at 12:53:31PM -0700, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
> > The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1
> > => egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with
> > Stable tools.
> >
> > You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade a
> The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1
> => egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with
> Stable tools.
>
> You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade all of your OS from
> 3.X to 4.0 (then you will use the -Current sources for your k
Hello,
The standard compiler has changed between 3.x and -Current (gcc2.7.2.1
=> egcs) - so don't even think of compiling code from -Current with
Stable tools.
You may want to try some "make upgrade" to upgrade all of your OS from
3.X to 4.0 (then you will use the -Current sources for your kerne
Hi Folks,
I've been getting the src-sys stuff via CVS and now want to build it. Can
this
be done with just the 3.1 tools (right off the CD) or do I need the compilers
etc. as well?
I get the following when doing a make in src/sys:
===> boot/i386/boot2
cc -elf -I/usr/local/FreeBSD-curr
96 matches
Mail list logo
