Re: Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 04:36, Jan Beich wrote: > Graham Perrin writes: > > > - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for > > Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu? > > > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1 > > Only one icu version is supported in the ports

Re: Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Jan Beich
Graham Perrin writes: > - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for > Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu? > > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1 Only one icu version is supported in the ports tree, so the above is nop. The ports are built against whatever

Waterfox: downgrading to icu-62.1_2,1 and rebuilding consumers

2018-10-28 Thread Graham Perrin
Thanks, people! devel/icu was the hint that I needed. On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 23:26, Jan Beich wrote: > … Either rebuild www/waterfox from the last revision before removal or > downgrade devel/icu to 62.1 if nothing else requires 63.1. In the former > case you can also update the port (adjust

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-10 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/9/2012 8:26 AM, Chris Rees wrote: On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of ports in /var/db/pkg. I

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-09 Thread Chris Rees
On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg,

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-09 Thread 乔楚
2012/8/9 Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com: On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, O. Hartmann ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of ports in /var/db/pkg. I

pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-07 Thread O. Hartmann
packages will be installed: Installing pkg-config: 0.25_1 Downgrading pciids: 20120711 - 20120625 Downgrading libdrm: 2.4.31_1 - 2.4.17_1 Installing libGL: 7.6.1 Installing perl: 5.14.2_2 Downgrading dbus: 1.4.14_3 - 1.4.14_2 Downgrading dri

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-07 Thread Bryan Drewery
) in total with your package database. The following packages will be installed: Installing pkg-config: 0.25_1 Downgrading pciids: 20120711 - 20120625 Downgrading libdrm: 2.4.31_1 - 2.4.17_1 Installing libGL: 7.6.1 Installing perl: 5.14.2_2

Re: pkg and portmaster: Downgrading ports? Why? portmaster messes up ...

2012-08-07 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything is going into a file based SQLite3 DB? Also ensure WITH_PKGNG=yes is in your /etc/make.conf. My last comment

Re: Downgrading

2002-01-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:59:27PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Timothy Aslat wrote: Hi All, Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE? I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch. THis belongs

Re: Downgrading

2002-01-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll fix it. I mean if it WILL be broken, as tonight's -CURRENT has successfully built -STABLE. Didn't test the `installworld' part, but I don't

Re: Downgrading

2002-01-17 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:27:08AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: Ruslan Ermilov wrote: FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll fix it. I mean if it WILL be broken, as tonight's -CURRENT has successfully

Downgrading

2002-01-16 Thread Timothy Aslat
Hi All, Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE? I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch. Regards Tim -- | The most exciting phrase to | Tim Aslat [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | hear in science, the one

Re: Downgrading

2002-01-16 Thread Terry Lambert
Timothy Aslat wrote: Hi All, Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE? I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch. THis belongs on -questions. In general, you can boot from a CDROM of the version you

Re: guide to downgrading from 5.0 to 4.4-STABLE

2001-11-04 Thread John
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 06:35:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: Aye; feel free to holler if you find your machine wedged. It can be Very Helpful to have another fallback machine for various reasons Hi Well, after a couple of false starts, managed to downgrade successfully and so far,

guide to downgrading from 5.0 to 4.4-STABLE

2001-11-02 Thread John
Hello List Is there a guide or a how-to showing how to downgrade from a 5.0-CURRENT snapshot to 4.4-STABLE without having to blat the system and start again? The reason 5.0 is on there is because only 5 had support for the promise udma 100 tx2 card, but now that 4.4 has it, i would like to

Re: guide to downgrading from 5.0 to 4.4-STABLE

2001-11-02 Thread Michael Lucas
Having done this several times before, I highly recommend downgrading via binary package. Back up your system first! Get your 4.4 CD, throw it in the drive, and see what happens. As a rule this is not guaranteed to work, but if it doesn't then a downgrade from source certainly won't. I