Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-05 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn had to walk into mine and say: [...] > Yes, this patch fixes the problem. Thank you, Bill Paul ! *sigh* It figures. Ok, I applied the patch to -current and -stable. We now return you to your regularly scheduled program. P

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-05 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Bill Paul writes: >Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn >had to walk into mine and say: > >> OK. Unfortunately, gdb core dumps when I try to analyze a crash dump >> with a debugging kernel :( Even worse, gdb core dumps when I try to >> run a debugging gdb in gdb

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-04 Thread Bill Paul
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Gary Jennejohn had to walk into mine and say: > OK. Unfortunately, gdb core dumps when I try to analyze a crash dump > with a debugging kernel :( Even worse, gdb core dumps when I try to > run a debugging gdb in gdb to find out why gdb is

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-04 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Matthew Dillon writes: >:Thanks, but there is code in rl_rxeof() to align to a 32 bit boundary. >:If that weren't the case than I would expect the Alpha to panic with >:other IP applications, not just NFS. >: >:I don't know, NFS must be doing something weird. >: >:--- >:Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PRO

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Matthew Dillon writes: >:Thanks, but there is code in rl_rxeof() to align to a 32 bit boundary. >:If that weren't the case than I would expect the Alpha to panic with >:other IP applications, not just NFS. >: >:I don't know, NFS must be doing something weird. >: >:--- >:Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PRO

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-03 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Thanks, but there is code in rl_rxeof() to align to a 32 bit boundary. :If that weren't the case than I would expect the Alpha to panic with :other IP applications, not just NFS. : :I don't know, NFS must be doing something weird. : :--- :Gary Jennejohn / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Doug Rabson writes: >On Tue, 2 May 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > >> >> :Is anyone else observing kernel panics in the NFS code with Alpha >> :(pc164) and rl0 (the Alpha is running as a client only) ? >> : >> :NFS worked just fine when I had a de0 in the box. After installing an >> :rl0 (I know th

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-03 Thread Doug Rabson
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Is anyone else observing kernel panics in the NFS code with Alpha > :(pc164) and rl0 (the Alpha is running as a client only) ? > : > :NFS worked just fine when I had a de0 in the box. After installing an > :rl0 (I know they suck, but they're so chea

Re: NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-02 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Is anyone else observing kernel panics in the NFS code with Alpha :(pc164) and rl0 (the Alpha is running as a client only) ? : :NFS worked just fine when I had a de0 in the box. After installing an :rl0 (I know they suck, but they're so cheap :) I _always_ get an :unaligned access panic when I t

NFS, rl0 and Alpha

2000-05-02 Thread Gary Jennejohn
Is anyone else observing kernel panics in the NFS code with Alpha (pc164) and rl0 (the Alpha is running as a client only) ? NFS worked just fine when I had a de0 in the box. After installing an rl0 (I know they suck, but they're so cheap :) I _always_ get an unaligned access panic when I try to a