Martijn Pronk wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-).
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
Martijn Pronk wrote:
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
/home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has incomplete type
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect of:
In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
/home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has incomplete type
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in effect
of:
In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
/home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.h:174: field `nc_lock' has
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in
effect of:
In file included from /home/src/sys/netncp/ncp_conn.c:46:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:10:45PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote the words in effect of:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:10:50PM +0100, Martijn Pronk wrote the words in
effect of:
In file included from
Nate Lawson wrote:
It's not so much that I volunteered as I said that I'd help with
thread/proc issues..
The trouble was that there are places where it used a proc in the old
code, but in some cases it needs to be a proc, and in other cases it now
needs to be a thread. But all they
Terry Lambert wrote:
I'll take a whack at it and send it out by tomorrow, working or not.
Don't bother. 8-).
The attached patch makes it compile, and takes a shot at doing the
right thing.
Just a followup... select definitely won't work (IMO), but needs
someone who is threads-savvy
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a
decent bug report. It doesn't
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
If I might suggest: there's a freebsd-qa mailing list. It's a great place
to organize QA efforts, whereas freebsd-chat is notorious for its lack of
signal (it's where dead signals go to rot).
There's been some talk of freebsd-qa, but so
Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-). Was wondering if
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Martijn Pronk wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-).
Robert Watson wrote:
It sounds like there are a couple of problems here
-- that we need a debugging guide (How to prepare a useful bug
report for a kernel panic, How to prepare a useful bug report
for a sysinstall failure, etc)
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 2:31 PM -0800 2002/11/22, Terry Lambert wrote:
A bug-filing wizard would be useful. The send-pr system
doesn't cut it, and most people are unaware of how to file a
decent bug report. It doesn't help when the process involves
another
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes :-). Was wondering if anyone with FreeBSD
kernel
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
The build of netncp is currently broken on 5.0-CURRENT, and I'd like to
see this fixed before 5.0-RELEASE. Unfortunately, we're having a lot of
trouble finding a test environment, which is the natural and immediate
follow-on to the compile fixes
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Brad Knowles wrote:
At 5:23 PM -0500 2002/11/21, Robert Watson wrote:
(And, you have to bring your own test environment, as the second sentence
suggests, but doesn't actually state).
Over on -chat, we're in the process of putting together a list
of
19 matches
Mail list logo
