fts(3) not checking for readdir(3) errors

2022-03-07 Thread Ganael Laplanche
Hello, For one of my projects, I've received a patch to our implementation of fts(3) which does not check for readdir(3) errors. The patch seemed obvious and looked OK to me so I merged it to my project. I think we should merge it to FreeBSD too so I've opened a PR (with the patch) here:

Re: Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-12 Thread Xin Li
On 7/12/20 12:29 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > bob prohaska wrote this message on Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 20:33 -0700: >> Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines of >> a checksum or parity test? >> >> Just curious what happens if a page wri

Re: Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Xin Li wrote this message on Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 15:06 -0700: > > > On 7/12/20 12:29 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > bob prohaska wrote this message on Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 20:33 -0700: > >> Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines of > &

Re: Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
bob prohaska wrote this message on Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 08:37 -0700: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:29:12AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > bob prohaska wrote this message on Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 20:33 -0700: > > > Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines o

Re: Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-12 Thread bob prohaska
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:29:12AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > bob prohaska wrote this message on Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 20:33 -0700: > > Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines of > > a checksum or parity test? > > > > Just curious what ha

Re: Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
bob prohaska wrote this message on Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 20:33 -0700: > Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines of > a checksum or parity test? > > Just curious what happens if a page written out is corrupted when > it comes back. Looks like it

Is there any error checking on swap?

2020-07-11 Thread bob prohaska
Is there any error checking on swap traffic, along the lines of a checksum or parity test? Just curious what happens if a page written out is corrupted when it comes back. Thanks for reading, bob prohaska ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-20 Thread Alan Somers
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 7:40 AM Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > On 19-06-20 05 h 59, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Alan Somers wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-20 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> On 19-06-20 05 h 59, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Alan Somers wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan Somers wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-20 Thread Claude Buisson
On 19-06-20 05 h 59, Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Alan Somers wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan Somers wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh wrote: On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Alan

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan Somers wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Alan Somers
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 8:41 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan Somers wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Alan Somers wrote: >> >> >> >> Does anybody know how to check out a local

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 7:09 PM Alan Somers wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Alan Somers wrote: > >> > >> Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG > >> repository? I can view it with ViewVC, but I

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Alan Somers
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 5:38 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Alan Somers wrote: >> >> Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG >> repository? I can view it with ViewVC, but I would really like local >> access. It doesn't seem to be available on

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
> > From: Alan Somers > > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:12:21 -0600 > > Subject: Checking out the CSRG repository? > > To: FreeBSD CURRENT > > > > Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG > > repository? I can view it with ViewVC

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Kirk McKusick
> From: Alan Somers > Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:12:21 -0600 > Subject: Checking out the CSRG repository? > To: FreeBSD CURRENT > > Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG > repository? I can view it with ViewVC, but I would really like local >

Re: Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Warner Losh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:14 PM Alan Somers wrote: > Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG > repository? I can view it with ViewVC, but I would really like local > access. It doesn't seem to be available on the usual repo.FreeBSD.org > or svn.FreeBSD.org. > > $ svn

Checking out the CSRG repository?

2019-06-19 Thread Alan Somers
Does anybody know how to check out a local copy of the CSRG repository? I can view it with ViewVC, but I would really like local access. It doesn't seem to be available on the usual repo.FreeBSD.org or svn.FreeBSD.org. $ svn checkout https://svn.FreeBSD.org/csrg csrg svn: E170013: Unable to

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-20 Thread Mark Millard
t5-testlib | qt5-testlib-5.11.2 >>> . . . >>> [07:31:31] [10] [06:42:01] Saved devel/qt5-testlib | qt5-testlib-5.11.2 >>> wrkdir to: >>> /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/FBSDFSSDjailCortexA57-default/default/qt5-testlib-5.11.2.tar >>> [07:31:32] [10] [06:

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
b-5.11.2 >> . . . >> [07:31:31] [10] [06:42:01] Saved devel/qt5-testlib | qt5-testlib-5.11.2 >> wrkdir to: >> /usr/local/poudriere/data/wrkdirs/FBSDFSSDjailCortexA57-default/default/qt5-testlib-5.11.2.tar >> [07:31:32] [10] [06:42:02] Finished devel/qt5-testlib |

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
devel/qt5-testlib | qt5-testlib-5.11.2: > Failed: configure/runaway > > With logs/errors/qt5-testlib-5.11.2.log showing: > > Checking for POSIX monotonic clock... > + cd > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/qt5-testlib/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.11.2/config.tests/clock-monotonic > &am

FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
re/runaway With logs/errors/qt5-testlib-5.11.2.log showing: Checking for POSIX monotonic clock... + cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/qt5-testlib/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.11.2/config.tests/clock-monotonic && /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/qt5-testlib/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.11.2/bin/qm

amd64 head -r317015 system clang 4.0 crashes during qt5-widgets "checking" activity: "Wrong prefetch hint in intrinsic: should be 0 or 1" (avx512.cpp)

2017-04-16 Thread Mark Millard
[ports -r438577 with devel/*binutils reverted to 2.27 via -r436731 .] The qr5-widgets build attempt reported: checking for avx512cd... clang++ -c -pipe -O2 -g -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -mavx512cd -g -Wall -W -fPIC -DAVX512WANT=CD -I. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/lib/qt5

Re: WTF mergemaster VCS Id checking?

2012-01-16 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
with branches and causes version number churn on many files. upstream files have the following VCS Id: # $FreeBSD$ and that anulls version checking. Recently, a lot of files in /etc (ie., rc.d files) have received full VCS Id strings, but not all. Someone ought to touch files in the subversion

Re: WTF mergemaster VCS Id checking?

2012-01-16 Thread Doug Barton
On 01/15/2012 23:31, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote: Apparently, some upstream files have the following VCS Id: # $FreeBSD$ and that anulls version checking. Your src tree is not checked out properly. This usually happens because at some point in the subversion 1.6 days you used devel/subversion

WTF mergemaster VCS Id checking?

2012-01-15 Thread deeptec...@gmail.com
$ and that anulls version checking. Recently, a lot of files in /etc (ie., rc.d files) have received full VCS Id strings, but not all. Someone ought to touch files in the subversion repository? So in either way you look at it, something is WRONG(TM). BTW, off-topic: 1. mergemaster outputs CVS Id, while

Re: gmultipath: act/act, path checking?

2011-10-28 Thread Alexander Motin
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote: are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active? Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect to have something to present in a week or two. It

Re: gmultipath: act/act, path checking?

2011-10-28 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 10/28/2011 12:37 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote: are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active? Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect

gmultipath: act/act, path checking?

2011-10-26 Thread Dennis Koegel
Cheers, are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active? Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a certain path due to failure, it will never come back automatically. (And it won't ever be used if it isn't

Re: gmultipath: act/act, path checking?

2011-10-26 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 10/26/2011 2:09 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote: Cheers, are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active? I was given patches but have lacked motivation to do it. Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a

Re: gmultipath: act/act, path checking?

2011-10-26 Thread Alexander Motin
Hi. On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote: are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active? Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a certain path due to failure, it will never come back automatically.

freebsd-update not checking disk space?

2011-10-25 Thread René Ladan
Hi, I tried to upgrade a server at work from 8.2-RELEASE-i386 to 9.0-RC1-i386 using freebsd-update.When running 'freebsd-update install' to install the new kernel, but that failed because there was insufficient disk space. This resulted in freebsd-update thinking everything is ok but left the

Re: freebsd-update not checking disk space?

2011-10-25 Thread Colin Percival
On 10/25/11 00:52, René Ladan wrote: I tried to upgrade a server at work from 8.2-RELEASE-i386 to 9.0-RC1-i386 using freebsd-update.When running 'freebsd-update install' to install the new kernel, but that failed because there was insufficient disk space. This resulted in freebsd-update

Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-13 Thread Jaakko Heinonen
On 2010-10-12, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 12/10/2010 16:36 Matthew Jacob said the following: Good workaround, still a nasty surprising bug. Yeah. I also would prefer ignoring such a partition or somehow sanitizing its name or etc. panic(9) on bad internal state of a kernel sounds

Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-12 Thread Jaakko Heinonen
On 2010-10-11, barbara wrote: The panic is caused by: g_dev_taste(): make_dev_p() failed (gp-name=ext2fs//, error=22) as I have a linux partition (I swear, it's for my mom!) on the same machine. As I don't care about that partition (being ext4 I can't even mount it), is there any solution

Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
Good workaround, still a nasty surprising bug. On 2010-10-11, barbara wrote: The panic is caused by: g_dev_taste(): make_dev_p() failed (gp-name=ext2fs//, error=22) as I have a linux partition (I swear, it's for my mom!) on the same machine. As I don't care about that partition (being ext4 I

Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-12 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 12/10/2010 16:36 Matthew Jacob said the following: Good workaround, still a nasty surprising bug. Yeah. I also would prefer ignoring such a partition or somehow sanitizing its name or etc. panic(9) on bad internal state of a kernel sounds appropriate, panic(9) on bad input sounds like

Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
I am antisocial. Okay, changed it so my replies are above the quotes. Seems to have attributes here. And I usually hit 'reply list' since multiple copies burns bandwidth. On 10/12/2010 1:57 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: P.S. Matthew, it seems like you have a really unhelpful mail client

Re:HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-11 Thread barbara
Since r213526 device names are checked on device registration. That is, if you call a make_dev*() function with an invalid device name, a panic will occur by default. For make_dev_credf(9) or make_dev_p(9) you can specify the MAKEDEV_CHECKNAME flag to get an error return instead of a panic.

HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration

2010-10-07 Thread Jaakko Heinonen
Since r213526 device names are checked on device registration. That is, if you call a make_dev*() function with an invalid device name, a panic will occur by default. For make_dev_credf(9) or make_dev_p(9) you can specify the MAKEDEV_CHECKNAME flag to get an error return instead of a panic.

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Robert Watson
for the event. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories ... Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: checking stopevent 2 with the following non-sleepable locks held: Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Cosmin Stroe
+current/freebsd-current ... Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: checking stopevent 2 with the following non-sleepable locks held: Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sigacts r = 0 (0xc4656aa8) locked @ /hummer/src-current/src/sys/kern/kern_condvar.c:289

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Sven Esbjerg
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:38:37AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: I'm seeing the same on a recently upgraded dual cpu machine. Also when I run the reboot command the errors get mixed

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Sven Esbjerg wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:38:37AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: I'm seeing the same on a recently upgraded dual cpu machine. Also

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Don Lewis
On 15 Nov, Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: Heh. Sounds like your box is having a really bad day, we'll see if we can't get it fixed up over the next couple of weeks as things settle out

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I hope the fix isn't too extensive, since I'll probably be typing it in : by hand in single user mode ... You could do what I did: remove the two lines that jhb added. You'll get no more warnings. Sure, the problems

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I hope the fix isn't too extensive, since I'll probably be typing it in : by hand in single user mode ... You could do what I did: remove the two lines that jhb

Re: checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-15 Thread Andy Farkas
Robert Watson wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Andy Farkas wrote: These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: Heh. Sounds like your box is having a really bad day, we'll see if we can't get it fixed up over the next couple of weeks as things settle out :-). As

checking stopevent 2!

2003-11-14 Thread Andy Farkas
Help! These messages spew onto my console and into syslogd once every second: ... Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: checking stopevent 2 with the following non-sleepable locks held: Nov 15 16:05:44 kern.crit hummer kernel: exclusive sleep mutex sigacts r = 0 (0xc4656aa8) locked

Bug: nmount(2) lacks parameter checking.

2003-11-04 Thread Peter Edwards
) vfs_buildopts also leaks memory if it jumps to bad: anything in the current option is lost to the woods. There's also no checking on how much memory is actually aquired by vfs_buildopts(): it can be passed up to MAX_IOVCOUNT (1024) elements in the iovec, and each of these can be up to 64K in size. That's

Checking the status of ATA raids in periodic daily ?

2003-10-24 Thread Jesper Skriver
source_periodic_confs fi case $daily_status_ata_raid_enable in [Yy][Ee][Ss]) echo echo 'Checking status of ATA raid partitions:' rc=0 for raid in `/usr/bin/find /dev/ -name 'ar[0-9]*' -type c \ | /usr/bin/egrep '[0-9]$' | /usr/bin/egrep -v 's

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-08-14 Thread John Birrell
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:45:39PM -0700, Stephen Casner wrote: I tried what I thought might be the equivalent patch (eliminating an else clause), but it did not solve the problem. In 4.8-RELEASE I sometimes get a system hang and sometimes not, but even when it does not hang, I just get

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-08-14 Thread Stephen Casner
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, John Birrell wrote: On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:45:39PM -0700, Stephen Casner wrote: I tried what I thought might be the equivalent patch (eliminating an else clause), but it did not solve the problem. In 4.8-RELEASE I sometimes get a system hang and sometimes not, but

password strength checking not consistently implemented

2003-08-14 Thread Glenn Johnson
I have set up the password strength checking system using pam_passwdqc.so, set in /etc/pam.d/passwd. I have also set up password expiration. When a user issues the 'passwd' command, the password strength checking module works as expected. When a user logs in via the console after the password

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-08-07 Thread Stephen Casner
My question is really about -STABLE rather than -CURRENT, but it involves a problem recently resolved in -CURRENT. On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Bill Paul started this thread regarding failed support for the Sony PCMCIA CD-ROM drive (NinjaATA-) in releases since 4.5, including 4.8 and 5.1. You folks

Checking buildworld success from ssh

2003-07-28 Thread Gregory Pavelcak
Hi all, I started a buildworld on current sources this morning, but, foolishly, didn't redirect the output to a file. Now I have some free time at work and would like to ssh in and do the kernel and mergemaster. Of course, I don't want to do these things if buildworld failed. Is there any way I

Re: Checking buildworld success from ssh

2003-07-28 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:28:07AM -0400, Gregory Pavelcak wrote: Hi all, I started a buildworld on current sources this morning, but, foolishly, didn't redirect the output to a file. Now I have some free time at work and would like to ssh in and do the kernel and mergemaster. Of course, I

Re: Checking buildworld success from ssh

2003-07-28 Thread Henry Vogt
Hi, you could restart the buildworld with the -DNOCLEAN option, this would terminate much faster than usual o r show up where it fails.. Hope this helps. Regards Henry Am Montag, 28.07.03, um 15:28 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Gregory Pavelcak: Hi all, I started a buildworld on current

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-27 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Bill Paul wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], M. Warner Losh writes: Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. FYI, I have a no-name

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Soeren Schmidt wrote: I do have problems with the wording you use in the comments in that patch mentioned below, I will even say that I will remove that as soon as it appears *and* shoot the committer so it doesn't happen again to use your choice of wording.. While you are making those

Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
A long time ago, circa FreeBSD 4.3, my Sony PCMCIA CD-ROM drive with brain-damaged Teac ATA controller drive worked, and the people were content and all was right with the land. Then my 4.4 CD set arrived, and I was disappointed to find the install kernel would lock up after the driver was

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
Lose the attitude in the patch and email. otherwise it looks good. I'd rather that we had a table rather than doing the string coparison, but I can fix that after your commit. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Soeren Schmidt
I do have problems with the wording you use in the comments in that patch mentioned below, I will even say that I will remove that as soon as it appears *and* shoot the committer so it doesn't happen again to use your choice of wording.. Now, I dont think this way is productive at all, and would

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. If you are uninterested in working with us to get things in, then your patch will not lasts the evening as such

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) writes: : P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that : broke support for my 3Com 3c575C cardbus ethernet NIC. It looks like my 3ccfe575ct is working well as of lasts week's current. Any

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, Bill Paul wrote: A long time ago, circa FreeBSD 4.3, my Sony PCMCIA CD-ROM drive with brain-damaged Teac ATA controller drive worked, and the people were content and all was right with the land. Then my 4.4 CD set arrived, and I was disappointed to find the install

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. Close, but this doesn't quite do it. I thought something didn't look right when I read it, and I tested it

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread David Xu
- Original Message - From: Soeren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:03 AM Subject: Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c I do have problems with the wording you use

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Wilko Bulte
Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:03 AM Subject: Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c I do have problems with the wording you use in the comments in that patch

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Ian Dowse
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], M. Warner Losh writes: Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. FYI, I have a no-name (PCMCIA/CD-ROM) drive that also

RE: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Will Saxon
-Original Message- From: David Xu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:30 PM To: Soeren Schmidt; Bill Paul Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c I have another problem different with Bill Paul's

RE: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Julian Elischer
Schmidt; Bill Paul Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c I have another problem different with Bill Paul's. I have a Tyan Tiger 230T dual CPU MB. On second IDE, there are MITSUBISHI 52X CDROM as master and a SONY CD-RW

RE: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Will Saxon
-Original Message- From: Julian Elischer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:26 PM To: Will Saxon Cc: David Xu; Soeren Schmidt; Bill Paul; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c Nvidia (I previously

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Bill Paul
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], M. Warner Losh writes: Here's a better patch, basesd on wpaul's input. Bill, can you try it an see if it works for you? If so, i would be better to commit this one. If not, I'll work with you to fix it. FYI, I have a no-name (PCMCIA/CD-ROM) drive that also

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) writes: : P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that : broke support for my 3Com 3c575C cardbus ethernet NIC. It looks

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread M. Warner Losh
This works for all my ata-like cards. I've gone ahead and committed it... Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Heads up: checking in change to ata-card.c

2003-06-26 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 05:04:10PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:20:04PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) writes: : P.S.: Be sure to join us next time when I ream out whoever it was that :

bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread KOMATSU Shinichiro
(add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat, which depends on gmake, which depends

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Maxim Sobolev
KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat,

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Oliver Braun
* Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-05-11 15:00]: KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency that was

Re: bsd.port.mk dependency loop checking patch (Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?)

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:00:53PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: KOMATSU Shinichiro wrote: (add To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) From: Garrett Rooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ? Date: Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:31:32AM JST there's a circular dependency

Re: checking in...

2001-11-19 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 02:41:30PM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote: hello all, please tell me if i have done something wrong but... i have installed 5.0-CURRENT as of the latest CVS copy of 7.00pm GMT British Time.. it all works fine... but.. i think there is a problem witht the linux

checking in...

2001-11-18 Thread Hiten Pandya
hello all, please tell me if i have done something wrong but... i have installed 5.0-CURRENT as of the latest CVS copy of 7.00pm GMT British Time.. it all works fine... but.. i think there is a problem witht the linux compatibility.. although i am not a very much of a programmer (yet).. but...

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patchincluded)

2000-09-30 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jkh there should be a boot/kernel/kernel.ko file and I'm not sure why jkh there isn't. This is because 'release.3' target (in src/release/Makefile) does not know that the kernel should go to into ${RD}/trees/bin/boot/kernel. Note that we cannot change 'doKERNEL' target, which is also used by

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patch included)

2000-09-29 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Speaking about sysinstall, would you please check my PR (bin/21423, URL:http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21423) ? Done and fixed, thanks! It should be in the next (2930) -current snapshot in ftp://current.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patchincluded)

2000-09-29 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jkh Done and fixed, thanks! Wow, thank you ^_^ But.. maybe my PR is not clearly described, it does not fix current situation; very sorry for my poor presentations. Here is a current directory structure (just extracted tarballs) of 5-current as of Sep/29/2000. % cd

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patch included)

2000-09-29 Thread Jordan Hubbard
% ls boot/kernel/kernel* zsh: no matches found: boot/kernel/kernel* That's a different problem - there should be a boot/kernel/kernel.ko file and I'm not sure why there isn't. I'll talk to David O'Brien about fixing it. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patchincluded)

2000-09-26 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
jkh Thanks for reminding me to go look at that code - you're right, jkh the check is incorrectly done and insufficiently general. Fixed jkh in -current and -stable! Very glad to hear that... thank you. Today is Wednesday and 3-stable build will run at current.jp.FreeBSD.org. If it goes

sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patch included)

2000-09-22 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
escape from version checking. Maybe "CD_VERSION = any" in cdrom.inf is reasonable solution. Index: cdrom.c === RCS file: /usr/site/FreeBSD/ncvs/src/release/sysinstall/cdrom.c,v retrieving revision 1.47 diff -c -r1.47 cdrom.c *** c

Re: sysinstall: Avoiding version checking of CD-ROM (patch included)

2000-09-22 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Most procedures works well, except one warnings. When CD-ROM is initialized to use (after all installation option was selected), sysinstall complains as follows: Thanks for reminding me to go look at that code - you're right, the check is incorrectly done and insufficiently general. Fixed in

Re: fsck successfull on checking root-fs but OS still can't mount it

1999-12-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Hi ! : :I'm seeing strange behaviour of fsck in -current. :FreeBSD titan.klemm.gtn.com 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Dec 22 07:07:11 :CET 1999 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/TITAN i386 : :SCSI bus hang, so I had to reboot. fsck checked every filesystem. :But then mount was unable to

Re: fsck successfull on checking root-fs but OS still can't mount it

1999-12-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon writes: I've been bitten by this several times myself recently. The system comes up after a crash, fsck's the media, and then can't mount it and drops into single-user. The only solution is to reboot. (install MAKEDEV by hand)

Re: fsck successfull on checking root-fs but OS still can't mountit

1999-12-23 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: :Hi ! : :I'm seeing strange behaviour of fsck in -current. :FreeBSD titan.klemm.gtn.com 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Dec 22 07:07:11 CET 1999 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/TITAN i386 : :SCSI bus hang, so I had to reboot. fsck

fsck successfull on checking root-fs but OS still can't mount it

1999-12-22 Thread Andreas Klemm
Hi ! I'm seeing strange behaviour of fsck in -current. FreeBSD titan.klemm.gtn.com 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Dec 22 07:07:11 CET 1999 root@:/usr/src/sys/compile/TITAN i386 SCSI bus hang, so I had to reboot. fsck checked every filesystem. But then mount was unable to mount