On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 09:15:24AM -0800, Evan Dower wrote:
> An update:
> CVSup'ing didn't fix the problem, but when I deleted the rtld.c and mv'd
> /etc/make.conf /etc/make.conf.hide, it stopped at
> /usr/src/contrib/amd/amd/srvr_nfs.c. So, I deleted that file, CVSup'd, and
> built again, and
eb doesn't show
any recent changes to either file. Any ideas on what was going on?
Thanks again,
Evan Dower
From: "Evan Dower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: buildworld failure, rtld-elf, RELENG_5_0
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:17:14 -0800
I'm trying to upgr
I'm trying to upgrade from -stable to 5, but the build failed at rtld-elf.
One error and a whole lot of warnings. I don't know where I should start as
I'm new to "current" (even though it's technically not -current). I swear I
followed the instructions in UPGRAD
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 07:09:06PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Not really. It is a transient bug that is almost as easy to fix as
> warn about.
So when can I expect the fix to be committed? :-D
- alex
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the bod
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> > rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile "0" constraint. This
> > constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
> > compiling without optimizations.
>
> D'o
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escriurères
> Juli Mallett wrote:
> > Errr, it was with 0 level optimisation that is the problem, not a real
> > level. Read carefully what bde said, and look at hte warnings and how
> > GCC deals with the code in question.
> >
> > Also, your example is very w
Juli Mallett wrote:
> Errr, it was with 0 level optimisation that is the problem, not a real
> level. Read carefully what bde said, and look at hte warnings and how
> GCC deals with the code in question.
>
> Also, your example is very wrong, read make(1)'s section on dealing with
> variables.
* Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escriurères
> Alex Zepeda wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile "0" constraint. This
> > > constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
> > > compil
Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile "0" constraint. This
> > constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
> > compiling without optimizations.
>
> D'oh!
>
> Is there any ch
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> rtld still uses asms with the old, broken/fragile "0" constraint. This
> constraint is especially broken/fragile if things are pessimized by
> compiling without optimizations.
D'oh!
Is there any chance of sticking a warning in the
mode or not I get:
>
> blarf:/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf#make
> cc -O0 -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386
^^^
> -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf -elf -fpic -DPIC -Wformat=2
> -Wno-format-extra-args -c /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c
> /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c
So what's up with -current?
I had to install gawk to get the kernel to build (and world too for that
matter).. I haven't had the balls to put the "one true awk" back in place.
But now whether in world mode or not I get:
blarf:/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf#make
cc -O0 -Wall -DFR
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:25:54PM +, David Malone wrote:
> > Cool, thanks!
>
> Bruch pointed out that we still have a small problem with the man
> page. Both brk and sbrk are now library functions, but their man
> page is still in section 2.
>
Hmm, I see.
The proper fix would be to repo-co
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000719 18:32] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > I needed to add 'cp' to src/Makefile.inc1, Marcel explained it to me
>
> Oh, so it was "cp" that wasn't found, I take it. We should change
> the message in make so it's more like what shells say ("command
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> I needed to add 'cp' to src/Makefile.inc1, Marcel explained it to me
Oh, so it was "cp" that wasn't found, I take it. We should change
the message in make so it's more like what shells say ("command not
found").
> but I'm sorry I did, -current is terribly broken. I
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000719 17:45] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ===> libexec/rtld-elf
> > chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> > chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ===> libexec/rtld-elf
> chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
> cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
> cp:No such fil
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> ===> libexec/rtld-elf
> chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
> chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
> cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
> cp:No such file or directory
> *** Error code 1
I think we need to c
===> libexec/rtld-elf
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/libe
In article <000c01bfeef3$8c71b8f0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So on Friday Morning, I deleted all my cvs source code and cvsup
> all new copies from scratch. I did a make world and the compile
> finished successfully.
Whew, you had me worried for awhile there.
new copies from scratch. I did a make world and the compile finished
successfully.
I am using dual PPro-200
- Original Message -
From: "John Polstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 5:34 PM
Sub
installworld with =
> freebsd-5.0. The install breaks with rtld-elf when the install put the =
> new copy of ld-elf.s0.1 onto my system. Most f my prgrams signal 11 =
> until I put the old ne back. Is there smething I was supposed t do =
> befre this??
Yours is the only troubl
Hmmm.. I have been experiencing a problem when I
installworld with freebsd-5.0. The install breaks with rtld-elf when the
install put the new copy of ld-elf.s0.1 onto my system. Most f my prgrams
signal 11 until I put the old ne back. Is there smething I was supposed t
do befre this??
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems that this patch fixed the problem for me.
> I can not reproduce it anymore.
That's good news. Thanks for testing it! I'll commit it later
today.
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
hi, there!
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
> > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
>
> If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try
> the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let m
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try
the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let me
know if it solves the problem.
Thanks,
John
Inde
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
> (until killed -9):
>
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
The last time this problem hap
hi, there!
On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
> Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours after I have merged
> the latest changes into -stable *sigh*.
>
> Could you please make sure your src/libexec/rtld-elf is
> up-to-date? rtld.c should be at revision 1.4
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Amancio Hasty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't
> upgraded my system since then.
Yes, that assert that failed wasn't in the dynamic linker on January
7. What I need to know is: did it start failing soo
|From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 21 11:23:14 2000
|
|In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
|Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
|
|Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I
|haven't changed
I am fairly certain that Java + TYA worked before Jan 7 -- haven't
upgraded my system since then.
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Russell L. Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
Did this problem just start, or has it been there for awhile? I
haven't changed the dynamic linker in -current since January 9, and
I'm w
I've seen it with yesterdays current and libc_r threads, and it's intermittent.
Russell
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
> (until killed -9):
>
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
Really?! Au
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 06:42:51PM +0600, Max Khon wrote:
> hi, there!
>
> applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
> (until killed -9):
>
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr
hi, there!
applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this
(until killed -9):
ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf
36 matches
Mail list logo
