random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
Just in case some else gets caught (which is sure to happen), in case you get the following obscure message from ssh after updating your -current: ssh: no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto. See ssl(8). This just means you need to remake your /dev/urandom (ln -f random urandom). It seems the

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:30:12AM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote: AMD K6-2 350 I noticed the vague stack smashes posting earlier ... and i think it's very likely this is the same bug Same here, random crashes -- AMD K6-2 300; no panic, no crash dump, just a complete system freeze if you

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Pierre Beyssac [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:30:12AM +0100, Pascal Hofstee wrote: I noticed the vague stack smashes posting earlier ... and i think it's very likely this is the same bug Same here, random crashes -- AMD K6-2 300; no panic, no crash dump, just a

Anoncvs support (was Re: NO MORE '-BETA')

2001-03-19 Thread Will Andrews
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:32:13AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: CVSup's checkout mode has been around longer than FreeBSD has offered anoncvs service. A service which, IMO, is still not very well supported. That's probably one reason why it's hard to get new developers (not everyone feels like

Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Now add default 1.1.1.1 command from /etc/ppp/ppp.conf does nothing interesting (PPP on demand), as result I have no route. Here is netstat -r after connection is established: Routing tables Internet: DestinationGatewayFlags Refs Use Netif Expire

Re: random woes (no RSA support in libssl and libcrypto)

2001-03-19 Thread Mark Murray
It seems the compatibility with the previous minor of urandom has been silently removed (I assume this happened with the last update/cleanup of the random device). It took me two hours to figure it out. See src/UPDATING 2624 M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To

Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
SMP box with a bleeding-edge -CURRENT kernel, patched to avoid the i586_bzero() problem: panic: mutex_enter: recursion on non-recursive mutex process lock @ ../../i386/i386/trap.c:854 cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100 Debugger("panic") CPU1 stopping CPUs: 0x0001... stopped. Stopped at

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:33:37 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Now add default 1.1.1.1 Perhaps, 1.1.1.1 should be written as HISADDR? No, it ALWAYS 1.1.1.1 and I have static IP address which not changed after

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:33:37 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Now add default 1.1.1.1 Perhaps, 1.1.1.1 should be written as HISADDR? No,

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:43:24 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:33:37 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Now add

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:33:37 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Now add default 1.1.1.1 Perhaps, 1.1.1.1 should be

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:55:15PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:33:37 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:

Re: growfs

2001-03-19 Thread Thomas
Hi, This was completely untested by us, and is not guaranteed to work! I think you were lucky. We move and change blocks on the filesystem, during some time the filesystem is NOT consitent, so if one of those files is accessed than you might run into a panic. Sorry? In single user with

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:25:14PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: Now add default 1.1.1.1 Perhaps, 1.1.1.1 should be written as HISADDR? command from /etc/ppp/ppp.conf does nothing interesting (PPP on demand), as result I have no route. Here is netstat -r after connection is

Re: Anoncvs support

2001-03-19 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A service which, IMO, is still not very well supported. That's probably one reason why it's hard to get new developers (not everyone feels like syncing the entire repo). But then again, I wonder how much load there is on anoncvs.freebsd.org. Still,

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:56:40 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:52:02PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:43:24 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:39:47PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:23:46PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:56:40 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:52:02PM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 16:43:24 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at

Re: growfs

2001-03-19 Thread Andrea Campi
It's hard to discuss what type of inconsistency there might be in an corrupted filesystem, compared to what growfs does. But I definitely change a lot of meta [...] So the development now focusses on getting it clean on alpha, and maybe support the existence of snapshots in the filesystem.

Shop Save Now!

2001-03-19 Thread A-Vision
Dear Friend, Take a look at these great savings opportunities. I-Shop Excel Online, in complete digital security. Shop Name brands, such as Lane Bryant, Neimann Markus, Omaha Steaks, Office Supplies, J.C. Penny, J. Crew, DirectTV, hard to find items, etc. Savings of 20% to 40%. Tax-Free

Re: Interesting backtrace...

2001-03-19 Thread Jake Burkholder
On 19 Mar 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: K6-2's aren't really i586's and i586_bzero should never be used for them (generic bzero is faster), Wrong. I fixed machdep.c to compute and print the bandwidth correctly: Wrong yourself. The fpu

Re: Anoncvs support (was Re: NO MORE '-BETA')

2001-03-19 Thread John Polstra
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Will Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:32:13AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: CVSup's checkout mode has been around longer than FreeBSD has offered anoncvs service. A service which, IMO, is still not very well supported. That's

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 19 Mr, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: 5. This affects not only ppp(8). Add default route that points to the LAN; change the IP address on interface; observe that the default route has gone away. The reason is that if we don't do this, we may end up using the old (now non-existing)

Re: Recent interface/routing changes breaks on-demand PPP

2001-03-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 06:34:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On 19 Mar, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: 5. This affects not only ppp(8). Add default route that points to the LAN; change the IP address on interface; observe that the default route has gone away. The reason is that

reboot(8) delay between SIGTERM and SIGKILL

2001-03-19 Thread Ian Dowse
I have noticed that reboot(8) sometimes appears not to wait long enough before sending the final SIGKILL to all processes. On a system that has a lot of processes swapped out, some processes such as the X server may get a SIGKILL before they have had a chance to perform their exit cleanup. The

Re: reboot(8) delay between SIGTERM and SIGKILL

2001-03-19 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ian Dowse writes: I have noticed that reboot(8) sometimes appears not to wait long enough before sending the final SIGKILL to all processes. On a system that has a lot of processes swapped out, some processes such as the X server may get a SIGKILL before they have

Re: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: db trace Debugger(c027d5e1) at Debugger+0x45 panic(c027c420,c027a154,c02997d0,356,d3f14ee0) at panic+0x144 witness_enter(d3f15000,0,c02997d0,356) at witness_enter+0x355 trap_pfault(d7345d4c,0,0) at trap_pfault+0x143 trap(18,10,10,d7345fa8,0) at trap+0x978

subscribe

2001-03-19 Thread Russ McMullin

Re: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Where does witness_enter+0x355 map to, in terms of line numbers? root@rsa /var/crash# gdb -k GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it

Re: Interesting backtrace...

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Jake Burkholder wrote: [bde wrote] Wrong yourself. The fpu is too slow to use for copying for everything except original Pentiums. The bandwidth test is just done to avoid hard- configuring this knowledge. If this is the case, is there much point in keeping the

Re: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Where does witness_enter+0x355 map to, in terms of line numbers? root@rsa /var/crash# gdb -k [...] Argh! Please ignore this, the machine gdb was running on had an old source tree. I'll get a correct

RE: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Mar-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: SMP box with a bleeding-edge -CURRENT kernel, patched to avoid the i586_bzero() problem: panic: mutex_enter: recursion on non-recursive mutex process lock @ ../../i386/i386/trap.c:854 cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100 Debugger("panic") That's a later

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try this workaround (apply with 'patch -l'): Here's a better workaround. Revert the previous patch and apply this one: Index: npx.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c,v

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread Pierre Beyssac
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:19:02PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote: Ok, thanks, note that your previous patch works fine, at least my make world is still running :-) Famous last words; I had a freeze soon afterwards. Though it seems to have improved the situation quite a bit. Now running another

Re: CURRENT instability

2001-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Mar-01 Pierre Beyssac wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:16:00PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Try this workaround (apply with 'patch -l'): Here's a better workaround. Revert the previous patch and apply this one: Ok, thanks, note

Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-19 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Hello all, Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-( Regards, Vladimir -- ===|=== Vladimir Kushnir | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Powered by FreeBSD

Re: Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-19 Thread Michael C . Wu
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled: | Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be | any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-( For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend using CVSup to get src-all

Re: Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled: | Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be | any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-( For all connections greater than 9600baud modems,

RE: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: Hmmm. An eip of 0 is bad. This could be just another instance of the bzero bug just in another place. You probably want to change the code that actually sets *bzero to i586_bzero (and same for any other ops that use floating point). The code in

Re: Whatever happened to CTM?

2001-03-19 Thread Ulf Zimmermann
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled: | Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be | any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur)

RE: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Mar-01 Bruce Evans wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: Hmmm. An eip of 0 is bad. This could be just another instance of the bzero bug just in another place. You probably want to change the code that actually sets *bzero to i586_bzero (and same for any other ops that

RE: Here's another one for you...

2001-03-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: Hmmm. An eip of 0 is bad. This could be just another instance of the bzero bug just in another place. You probably want to change the code that actually sets *bzero to i586_bzero (and same for any other

Re: ** HEADS UP **

2001-03-19 Thread Mike Bristow
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:13:09AM -0600, Peter Schultz wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: I committed a miibus'ified fxp driver to the tree today, and made it the default. If you compile fxp into your kernel statically, you will also need "device

Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2]

2001-03-19 Thread Michael C . Wu
Hi Everyone, This patch should allow our /bin/(color)ls to output Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and all European languages(including Russian) correctly. Thinker and I both tested this independently. isprint() already checks for _CTYPE stuff that Ache asked us to check. Thinker also fixed the

Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2]

2001-03-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C . Wu" writes: : | + while(*p1 != 0) { while (*p1 != '\0') { : | + c = sgetrune(p1, dc, p2); : | + if(c == _INVALID_RUNE) { space after the if. ditto further . : | + p1++; : | + dc--; : | +

Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2]

2001-03-19 Thread MINOURA Makoto
| In [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Michael C . Wu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please review this patch and comment on it. I plan to commit this in a few days if there are no more objections. OBJECTION. In general direct manipulation of rune is evil. It is an internal data structure in libc; using it

Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2]

2001-03-19 Thread Michael C . Wu
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 03:53:21PM +0900, MINOURA Makoto scribbled: | | | In [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | "Michael C . Wu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | Please review this patch and comment on it. I plan to commit | this in a few days if there are no more objections. | | OBJECTION. Please do not

Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2]

2001-03-19 Thread MINOURA Makoto
| In [EMAIL PROTECTED] | "Michael C . Wu" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: portability to what? We import colorls from outside, and I do not know what you want to "port" to that this would not work on. Ok. I'll paraphrae it. It is not the right way. So, will you please tell me how to solve